Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01732835

The HAART 300 Annuloplasty Ring Trial Extended Safety and Performance

This investigation is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center trial to evaluate the extended safety and performance of the HAART model 300 annuloplasty ring when used to surgically repair the aortic valve using a 3-D intra-annular mounting frame.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Aortic Regurgitation, (also known as Aortic Insufficiency; AI), is the failure of the aortic valve to close completely during diastole which causes blood to flow from the aorta back into the left ventricle. Aortic Regurgitation (AR) is a frequent cause of both disability and death due to congestive heart failure, primarily in individuals forty or older, but can also occur in younger populations.

Traditionally management of aortic regurgitation has been by aortic valve replacement, however, as has been observed in patients who have had mitral valve repair, the option of maintaining ones native aortic valve versus a replacement, either bioprosthetic or mechanical, can have added multiple benefits. The advantage of repair is the avoidance of prosthetic valve-related complications with bioprosthetic valves over 10-15 years or the need for anticoagulation with mechanical valves and the related problems of this therapy.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject is 18 years of age or older
  • Subject has tri-leaflet aortic valve morphology
  • Subject has documented aortic valve disease which may or may not include:
  • aortic valve insufficiency
  • aortic root pathology
  • pathology of the ascending aorta
  • patients with associated stable one or two vessel coronary disease requiring concomitant coronary bypass
  • Subject is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations, including transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) if there are inadequate images by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to assess the aortic valve
  • Subject has reviewed and signed the written informed consent form
  • Subject agrees to return for all follow-up evaluations for the duration of the study (i.e.,. geographically stable)

Exclusion criteria

  • The subject has pre-existing valve prosthesis in the aortic position
  • The subject's aortic valve morphology is not tri-leaflet
  • The subject has active endocarditis
  • Heavily calcified valves
  • The subject has mixed stenosis and regurgitation of the aortic valve with predominant stenosis
  • Leukopenia
  • Acute anemia (Hb < 9mg%)
  • Platelet count <100,000 cell/mm3
  • Need for emergency surgery for any reason
  • History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or the subject refuses blood transfusions
  • Active infection requiring antibiotic therapy (if temporary illness, subjects may enroll 4 weeks after discontinuation of antibiotics)
  • Subjects in whom transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is contraindicated
  • Low Ejection Fraction (EF) EF < 35%
  • Life expectancy < 1 year
  • The subject is or will be participating in a concomitant research study of an investigational product or has participated in such a study within the 30 days prior to screening
  • The subject is a minor, an illicit drug user, alcohol abuser, prisoner, institutionalized, or is unable to give informed consent
  • The subject is pregnant or lactating
  • Recent (within 6 months) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or a transient ischemic attack (TIA)
  • Myocardial Infarction (MI) within one month of trial inclusion
  • The subject has a known intolerance to titanium or polyester
  • The subject has documented unstable or > 2 vessel coronary disease
  • The subject requires additional valve replacement or valve repair

Treatment and study plan

HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device

Device

Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Safety Outcome Measure: Survival Defined as Survival Free From All Cause Death at 6 Months Postprocedure

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months

    Time frame: 6 months

    Assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Implant Procedure Success

    Time frame: discharge or 14 days postprocedure, whichever comes first

    Success is defined as the absence of specified adverse events evaluated through discharge or 14 days after the procedure: - Aortic annular dissection, rupture, or leaflet damage - Mitral valve impingement due to implant - implant dehiscence/migration into aorta - implant dehiscence/migration into left ventricle - Hemodynamics requiring intervention - Other adverse event resulting in reoperation, explantation, or permanent disability.

  2. Actuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events

    Time frame: 6 months

    Freedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events at 6 months postprocedure: - Device-related mortality - Complete heart block - Structural device failure - Endocarditis - Periprosthetic leak or dehiscence - Thromboembolism - Bleeding Event - Native Valve Deterioration - Valve Thrombosis - Hemolysis - Reoperation and explant at 6 months

  3. Survival Defined as Survival Free From All Cause Death at 2 Years Postprocedure

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years

    Time frame: 2 years

    Assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)

  5. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 6 Months

    Time frame: 6 months

    Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort

  6. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification at 2 Years

    Time frame: 2 years

    Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort

  7. Peak Gradient - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

  8. Peak Gradient - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

  9. Mean Gradient - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

  10. Mean Gradient - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

  11. LV Mass - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  12. LV Mass - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  13. LVID Diastole - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  14. LVID Diastole - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  15. LVID Systole - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  16. LVID Systole - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  17. LV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  18. LV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  19. LV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  20. LV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  21. LVEF - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  22. LVEF - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  23. Cardiac Output - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  24. Cardiac Output - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  25. Cardiac Index - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area

  26. Cardiac Index - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Biostable Science & Engineering

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

The HAART 300 Annuloplasty Ring Extended Safety and Performance Trial Used in Surgical Repair of the Aortic Valve

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2015
First posted
Nov 26, 2012
Registry last updated
Mar 10, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.