Assessment of Stroke Volume in Shock Using Echocardiography Versus Bioreactive Impedance
NCT07020637
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT02164799
The Shock Tool study is designed to improve the clinical evaluation for differentiating shock in the emergency department. The goal of this study is to evaluate and improve the accuracy of physicians differentiating causes of shock.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Specific Aim #1: To study the epidemiology of shock in the emergency department Hypothesis 1: We will better understand shock states if we determine shock etiology among patients presenting to the emergency department in a carefully conducted observational prospective study.
Specific Aim #2: To determine the accuracy of physician diagnosis for the underlying etiology of shock.
Hypothesis 2: Physician assessment of the underlying cause of shock is challenging and often inaccurate in the early stages of care in the emergency department.
Specific Aim #3: To optimize the evidence-based approach to assist in the diagnosis of shock etiology from elements readily available when a patient demonstrates shock physiology in the Emergency Department.
Hypothesis 3: An evidenced-based, standardized approach to clinical decision making integrating elements of the history, physical exam, and early testing will improve a physician's ability to accurately differentiate etiologies of shock.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Retrospectively, 1 month after enrollment
Each patient determined to have shock in the emergency department is given a single diagnosis by a reviewing physician after the hospital course is completed.
Time frame: This measure will be assessed at the time of physician review after discharge from hospital, on average 2 months after initial ED visit.
Death by any cause during hospitalization
Time frame: This measure will be assessed at the time of physician review after discharge from hospital, on average 2 months after initial ED visit.
A composite outcome met if any of the following are present during hospitalization: acute renal failure (creatinine 2x baseline or new initiation of dialysis), non-elective intubation, vasopressor requirement, or mortality.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Other
Establishing a Tool to Increase the Accuracy of Emergency Physicians Diagnosing Etiologies of Shock
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07020637
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02728791
Cardiac Output, Low, Cardiovascular Diseases
Brest, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07411976
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Nîmes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02476253
Acid-Base Imbalance, Acidosis
Montpellier, France
View Trial Details