Bekzat
Astana, 0.00001, Kazakhstan
NCT Number: NCT05695287
Abstract Anaesthetic support for cardiac surgery significantly influences the course of the intraoperative period and the success of the postoperative period. Total intravenous anaesthesia and inhalation anaesthesia are the traditional methods of anaesthesia in cardiac surgery. However, there are few studies assessing the effectiveness of surgical aggression protection in cardiac surgery.
Objectives: To study the effectiveness of body protection against surgical aggression by TIVA and inhalational anaesthesia in cardiac surgery.
Materials and methods. The examination and treatment data of 89 patients were included in the study. All patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, mitral valve replacement/plasty, aortic valve replacement cardiopulmonary bypass conditions.
The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the type of disease: the first (1) group with coronary heart disease. The second (2) group with valvular heart disease. There were 65 patients in the first group and 22 in the second. Both groups were divided into 3 subgroups according to the type of anaesthesia: patients anaesthetised with propofol, with sevoflurane, with isoflurane.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Astana, 0.00001, Kazakhstan
All patients were divided into 2 groups according to the type of disease: the first (1) group with coronary heart disease. The second (2) group with valvular heart disease. There were 65 patients in the first group and 22 in the second. Both groups were divided into 3 subgroups according to the type of anaesthesia: patients anaesthetised with propofol, with sevoflurane, with isoflurane.
The study was conducted in 5 stages:
Cardiac stroke volume was determined by transthoracic echocardiography (CS=end diastolic volume - end systolic volume). Cardiac output (CO=CS x heart rate), cardiac index (CI=CO/body surface area) were determined. We determined blood oxygen content using the formula CaO2 (arterial ABB) and CvO2 (central mixed venous ABB) = [(1.34 × Hb × SO2) + (PO2 × 0.031)] / 100. Arteriovenous difference = CaO2-CvO2. Oxygen delivery was determined using the formula (DO2 = CI* CaO2). Oxygen consumption (VO2 = Cardiac index (CI)*AVD or VO2 = CO × (CaO2 - CvO2) ~ CO × Hb × 1.34 × (SaO2 - SvO2) / 100).
In the second stage, after tracheal intubation, indirect calorimetry was used to determine VO2, energy expenditure during anaesthesia using a Spirometry device (Oxford, UK), which was connected to an endotracheal tube and continuously showed oxygen demand and energy expenditure. A transesophageal echocardiography sensor was used to determine cardiac output. Additionally, the cardiac output was determined by Fick's formula in patients with CHD. The same tests (cardiac output, cardiac index, consumption, oxygen delivery, energy expenditure) were performed in the third and fourth stages of anaesthesia. In the last stage, the consumption of muscle relaxants and opioid analgesics was calculated to assess the pharmaco-efficiency of anaesthetics. The time of extubation and the time of transfer of the patient to the specialist department were determined.
All patients continued antihypertensive medication both before and on the day of surgery to prevent the development of withdrawal syndrome and to reduce the risk of perioperative myocardial ischaemia.
All patients in both groups were anesthetized with fentanyl at a dose of 5-7 µg/kg, ketamine 1.5-2 mg/kg, and propofol 1-1.5 mg/kg intravenously fractionally. Pipecuronium bromide 0.04-0.07 mg/kg was used as muscle relaxant in all patients. To maintain anaesthesia in Group 1 P, propofol was used as an anaesthetic in a dose of 4-6 mg/kg/h intravenously on a perfusor (BBRAUN). In Group 2, sevoflurane was used as an anaesthetic in a dose of - 1.7-1.9 MAC. In Group 3 isoflurane was used as the anesthetic in the dose of 1.1-1.2 MAC. Fentanyl 100 µg intravenously was administered fractionally in all groups to increase heart rate and blood pressure, and pipecuronium bromide 2 mg intravenously for myorelaxation. During CPB, propofol at a dose of 6 mg/kg/h intravenously via perfusion was used in all patients in all groups. Anaesthesia regimen: fentanyl 100 µg IV every 30 min; myorelaxant pipecuronium bromide 2 mg every 40-60 min. Norepinephrine solution was administered at a dose of 0.07 µg/kg/min intravenously on perfusion and dobutamine 5 µg/kg/min after CPB in all patients at the same dosages in all groups.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
To maintain anaesthesia in Group 1 P, propofol was used as an anaesthetic in a dose of 4-6 mg/kg/h intravenously on a perfusor
Other names: Propofol;
Isoflurane
Other names: В качестве анестетика использовали изофлуран - 1,1-1,2 ПДК.
Sevoflurane
Other names: в качестве анестетика использовали севофлуран в дозе - 1,7-1,9 ПДК.
Time frame: 1 year
cardiac index (CI=CO/body surface area
Time frame: 1 year
oxygen consumption (VO2 = Cardiac index *AVD or VO2 = CO × (CaO2 - CvO2) ~ CB × Hb × 1,34 × (SaO2 - SvO2) / 100)
Time frame: 1 year
The oxygen delivery was found by formula (DO2 = CI* CaO2)
Time frame: 1 year
The cardiac stroke (CS) volume was determined by transthoracic echocardiography (CS =end diastolic volume-end systolic volume).
Astana Medical University
Other
The Effects of Sevoflurane, Isoflurane and Propofol on the Hemodynamic, Body Energy Expenditure During Cardiac Surgery in Adults: a Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02375282
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Insufficiency
Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01171625
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Disorder
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01651052
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Disorder
Krakow, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT00807040
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details