Novartis Investigative Site
Turku, 20521, Finland
NCT Number: NCT03300427
This is a phase IV, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study.
The study assessed the effects of 6 weeks of stable sacubitril/valsartan therapy, as compared with valsartan therapy, on the efficiency of cardiac work in patients with NYHA II-III heart failure (HF) and reduced systolic function using 11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET) and echocardiography.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Turku, 20521, Finland
Subjects were randomized into valsartan or sacubitril/valsartan arms in a 1:1 ratio. Regardless of the treatment arm a subject is in, the study drug was up-titrated to the highest tolerated dose level during the scheduled study visits. The different strengths of the two study drugs were not identical in appearance so the possible dose modification(s) during the treatment period could not be performed in a blinded manner. Subjects started on valsartan 80 mg BID or sacubitril/valsartan 100 mg BID dose and there was only one scheduled up-titration visit after the randomization. Exception for this were the subjects that were on valsartan 160 mg BID dose during the run-in phase. These subjects were randomized directly to valsartan 160 mg BID or sacubitril/valsartan 100 mg BID. Subjects that were randomized to valsartan arm had similar visit after which they continued on the same dose. For subjects that were randomized from valsartan 160 mg BID to sacubitril/valsartan 100 mg BID the dose was up-titrated to 200 mg BID if clinically possible.
The total duration for each patient was planned to be about 14 weeks but could be longer if required for scheduling purposes . The longest participation, from signing of ICF until end of study, was 26 weeks.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
sacubitril/valsatran 100 or 200 mg BID
Valsartan 80 or 160 mg BID
placebo to valsartan 80 or 160 BID
placebo to sacubitril/valsartan 100 or 200 mg BID
Time frame: Baseline, Visit 3 (approximately Week 8)
Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and echocardiography were performed before randomization (after a minimum of 4 weeks on stable dose of 80 mg BID or 160 mg BID of valsartan) and repeated after 6 weeks on a stable dose of either 80 mg BID or 160 mg BID of valsartan or 100 mg BID or 200 mg BID of sacubitril/valsartan.
Cardiac efficiency was calculated based on the following formula: Myocardial efficiency = ((SBP x SV x HR)/LV mass)/Kmono Where
Visit 3 was performed after the study treatment was on a stable dose for a minimum of 6 weeks. It could be performed before or after 8 weeks, based on when the last dose modification was performed.
No imputation of missing data was performed.
Time frame: Baseline, Visit 3 (approximately Week 8)
Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and echocardiography were performed before randomization (after a minimum of 4 weeks on stable dose of 80 mg BID or 160 mg BID of valsartan) and repeated after 6 weeks on a stable dose of either 80 mg BID or 160 mg BID of valsartan or 100 mg BID or 200 mg BID of sacubitril/valsartan.
Cardiac efficiency was calculated based on the following formula: Myocardial efficiency = ((SBP x SV x HR)/LV mass)/Kmono Where
Visit 3 was performed after the study treatment was on a stable dose for a minimum of 6 weeks. It could be performed before or after 8 weeks, based on when the last dose modification was performed.
No imputation of missing data was performed.
Time frame: Baseline, Visit 3 (approximately Week 8)
In addition to the derivation of the primary endpoint, an alternative formula was used, where the viable myocardial energetic efficiency was derived as:
Viable myocardial energetic efficiency = ((SBP x SV x HR)/LV mass) / vKmono Where vKmono is the viable myocardium clearance rate. This alternative parameter was included as a sensitivity analysis to exclude possible bias related to scar tissue in patients with ischemic myopathy.
Time frame: Baseline, Visit 3 (approximately Week 8)
In addition to the derivation of the primary endpoint, an alternative formula was used, where the viable myocardial energetic efficiency was derived as:
Viable myocardial energetic efficiency = ((SBP x SV x HR)/LV mass) / vKmono Where vKmono is the viable myocardium clearance rate. This alternative parameter was included as a sensitivity analysis to exclude possible bias related to scar tissue in patients with ischemic myopathy.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Industry
Controlled Trial on the Short-term Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy on Cardiac Oxygen Consumption and Efficiency of Cardiac Work in Patients With NYHA II-III Heart Failure and Reduced Systolic Function Using 11C-acetate Positron Emission Tomography and Echocardiography
Acronym: TurkuPET
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03749551
Cardiomegaly, Cardiomyopathies
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT03928158
Cardiomegaly, Cardiovascular Diseases
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT05646056
Aortic Stenosis, Subvalvular, Aortic Valve Disease
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02395107
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Odense C, Denmark
View Trial Details