National Medical Research Center for Cardiology
Moscow, 121552, Russia
NCT Number: NCT03928158
Patients with advanced LVH and HFpEF will be randomly assigned in open-label fashion to receive LCZ696 titrated to 200 mg twice daily or valsartan titrated to 160 mg twice daily, and will be treated for 24 weeks.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Moscow, 121552, Russia
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has a significant morbidity and mortality, and therapies that have proven effective in HF with reduced EF have not been shown to improve long-term prognosis in HFpEF. Inhibition of circulating neprilysin could augment deficient NP-receptor GC signaling and therefore be beneficial in HFpEF, as suggested by the decrease in NP following administration of valsartan/sacubitril in the phase 2 (PARAMOUNT study). Use of valsartan/sacubitril is currently being tested in the multicenter PARAGON-HF trial with HFpEF patients. The investigators suppose the best candidates for LCZ696 therapy will be patients with HFpEF and advanced concentric LV hypertrophy and obesity, i.e. having the lowest BNP bioavailability.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
50-100-200 mg tablet
40-80-160 mg tablet
Time frame: 24 weeks
Difference in distance walked during 6-minute walking test (6MWT) between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline
Time frame: 24 weeks
Difference in exercise time during DST between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline
Time frame: 24 weeks
Difference in LAVI assessed by echocardiography between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline
Time frame: 24 weeks
Difference in E/e' ratio assessed by echocardiography both at rest and at peak exercise during diastolic stress test (DST) between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline
Time frame: 24 weeks
Difference in PASP assessed by echocardiography at peak exercise both at rest and at peak exercise during diastolic stress test (DST) between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline
Time frame: 24 weeks
Difference in LVMI assessed by echocardiography between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline
Time frame: 24 weeks
Difference in NYHA class between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline
Time frame: 24 weeks
Difference in MLHFQ score between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline. The questionnaire is comprised of 21 important physical, emotional and socioeconomic ways heart failure can adversely affect a patient's life. After receiving brief standardized instructions, the patient marks a 0 (zero) to 5 scale to indicate how much each itemized adverse of heart failure has prevented the patient from living as he or she wanted to live during the past 4 weeks. The questionnaire is simply scored by summation of all 21 responses. Score ranges from 0 (best quality of life) to 105 (worst quality of life).
Time frame: 24 weeks
Difference in NT-proBNP plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline
Time frame: 24 weeks
Difference in hsCRP plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline
Time frame: 24 weeks
DIfference in PICP plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline
Time frame: 24 weeks
Difference in CITP plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline
Time frame: 24 weeks
Difference in PIIINP plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline
Time frame: 24 weeks
Difference in GDF-15 plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline
Time frame: 24 weeks
Difference in sST2 plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline
Time frame: 24 weeks
Difference in Galectin-3 plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline
Time frame: 24 weeks
DIfference in MCP-1 plasma levels between 24 weeks after baseline and at baseline
National Medical Research Center for Cardiology, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation
Other Gov
Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) in Patients With Advanced Hypertensive Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Clinical, Haemodynamic and Neurohumoral Effects (a Phase 2, Randomized, Single-center, Parallel Group Study)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03749551
Cardiomegaly, Cardiomyopathies
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT05646056
Aortic Stenosis, Subvalvular, Aortic Valve Disease
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03300427
Cardiomegaly, Cardiovascular Diseases
Turku, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT02395107
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Odense C, Denmark
View Trial Details