Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04140656

The Effects of Plantar Sensory Based Physiotherapy Interventions on Balance and Fallings of Nursing Home Elderly

Aging in all living things is defined as a normal physiological process that causes a decrease in realistic body function. According to the World Health Organization; It is classified as 65 years old and older and 85 years old and older (1). Characteristics of aging; decrease in reserve capacity of organ systems, decrease in homeostatic control, decrease in adaptability to environmental factors, decrease in stress response capacity (3). Stability is defined as postural stimulation against changes in the center of gravity during rest and activity. Postural answers that provide this harmony; vestibular, proprioceptive and visual data in the central nervous system. In older people, static balance can be maintained for a longer period of time, while dynamic balance may deteriorate more quickly. Aging-affected muscle strength, joint mobility, proprioceptive, vestibular and visual loss also make postural control difficult to achieve. Although the physiological mechanism underlying the risk of loss of equilibrium and falls is multifaceted, it is mostly caused by somatosensory sensitivity and decreased neuromuscular capacity (3-5). It has been determined that one third of the elderly individuals living in the society have fallen at least once a year and these rates have been stated to increase to 60% in nursing homes. Falls cause long-term disability, stay in nursing homes, in the absence of a serious injury as a result of falling, there is a fear of falling, which causes a limitation in activities of daily living. Due to the physiology of aging, it is stated that peripheral sensation decreases in older ages (12). Mold showed that bilateral somatosensorial disorder was present in approximately 26% of individuals aged 65-74, 36% of those aged 75-84, and 54% of those aged 85 years (13). In the literature, it was reported that plantar sensory loss in the elderly affects balance, mobility and gait and is a risk factor for falls (14). Different senses can be sensed by sensing receptors during the exercise program to increase sensory perception. Aerobic and strengthening exercise, feedback, virtual reality have been used in the studies on balance and falling seen in the elderly in recent years. However, a program aimed at increasing plantar sensation and it has not been found in the literature. In this study, physiotherapy programs aimed at increasing plantar sensation in the elderly will be compared.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

70 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Istanbul Medipol University

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

The study is planned to be conducted between the years of 2019-January-2020 for elderly people over 70 years old who live in Küçük Çamlıca Fahrettin Kerim Gökay Nursing Home. The study was planned as a randomized controlled clinical trial; By simple randomization method, cases will be divided into two groups. There are 47 elderly people over 70 years old in the nursing home to be studied. The sample size was planned to be 16 for each group.Group 1 (n:16), group 2 (n:17). 40 minutes / 3 days per week / 8 weeks long program will be applied to both groups. Four weeks after the first measurement, the second measurement was performed. Thus, pilot study was made. After the second measurement, rehabilitation program was started in both groups.After the 8-week program is finished, the third measurements will be made. After the third measurements, the fourth measurement will be done 4 weeks later for late results.The measurements are as follows.

Primary results: electronic pedobarography device for static and dynamic base pressure changes. Biodex balance test for measuring fall risk and static stability. For secondary results; 30 second Chair stand test, Berg balance scale, Semmes weinstein monofilament test.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Voluntariness
  • 70 years and older
  • Cognitive functions are sufficient for communication (MM score 22 and above)
  • 20 meters independent walk
  • The soles of the soles are at least at the reduced protective sensory level

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe visual loss
  • A history of mental retardation or schizophrenia
  • Person has any problems to prevent walking

Treatment and study plan

Plantar sensitive exercises

Other

Plantar sensitive exercises:

40 minutes / 3 days per week / 8 weeks Warm up exercise (5 minute) Walking on different 4 different textured floors and hot floor (15 minute) Trying to recognize small objects with the soles of the feet (5min) Seated work with barbed ball and balance pad (5min) Massage to the sole of the foot with different textured fabrics (5min) Cooling exercise (5 min)

Textured insole

Other

Textured insole group.

Plantar sensitive exercises with insole 40 minutes / 3 days per week / 8 weeks (all exercises will be done with insoles) Warm up exercise (5 minute) Walking on flat ground (15 minute) Exercise with roller under the sole of the foot (5 minute) Seated work with barbed balance pad (5 min) Dorsi flexion and plantar flexion and hip flexion exercises (5min). Cooling exercise (5 min)

Primary outcomes

  1. Pedobarographic investigation

    Time frame: day 0 (before intervention)

    By means of pressure sensors in force platforms, foot pressure is detected and transferred to computer environment. Static and dynamic measurement is also possible. Plantar pressure can be measured as total and divided areas and it will be combined to report g/cm2. Plantar contact area can be measured as total and divided areas and it will be combined to report cm2.

  2. Pedobarographic investigation

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    By means of pressure sensors in force platforms, foot pressure is detected and transferred to computer environment. Static and dynamic measurement is also possible. Plantar pressure can be measured as total and divided areas and it will be combined to report g/cm2. Plantar contact area can be measured as total and divided areas and it will be combined to report cm2.

  3. Pedobarographic investigation

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    By means of pressure sensors in force platforms, foot pressure is detected and transferred to computer environment. Static and dynamic measurement is also possible. Plantar pressure can be measured as total and divided areas and it will be combined to report g/cm2. Plantar contact area can be measured as total and divided areas and it will be combined to report cm2.

  4. Pedobarographic investigation

    Time frame: 16 weeks

    By means of pressure sensors in force platforms, foot pressure is detected and transferred to computer environment. Static and dynamic measurement is also possible. Plantar pressure can be measured as total and divided areas and it will be combined to report g/cm2. Plantar contact area can be measured as total and divided areas and it will be combined to report cm2.

  5. Biodex Balance System

    Time frame: day 0 (before intervention)

    It is a multi-axis device which objectively measures the balance of the person in static state or under dynamic stress and records the measurement results. The Biodex Balance System permits a 20 ° inclination of the foot platform in all directions. Thus, it provides maximum stimulation of the mechanical sensors in the ankle. Biodex Balance System measurements are calculated in degrees for each direction It can be done by creating a dynamic environment for the measurement of fall risk on the same platform .

  6. Biodex Balance System

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    It is a multi-axis device which objectively measures the balance of the person in static state or under dynamic stress and records the measurement results. The Biodex Balance System permits a 20 ° inclination of the foot platform in all directions. Thus, it provides maximum stimulation of the mechanical sensors in the ankle. Biodex Balance System measurements are calculated in degrees for each direction It can be done by creating a dynamic environment for the measurement of fall risk on the same platform .

  7. Biodex Balance System

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    It is a multi-axis device which objectively measures the balance of the person in static state or under dynamic stress and records the measurement results. The Biodex Balance System permits a 20 ° inclination of the foot platform in all directions. Thus, it provides maximum stimulation of the mechanical sensors in the ankle. Biodex Balance System measurements are calculated in degrees for each direction It can be done by creating a dynamic environment for the measurement of fall risk on the same platform .

  8. Biodex Balance System

    Time frame: 16 weeks

    It is a multi-axis device which objectively measures the balance of the person in static state or under dynamic stress and records the measurement results. The Biodex Balance System permits a 20 ° inclination of the foot platform in all directions. Thus, it provides maximum stimulation of the mechanical sensors in the ankle. Biodex Balance System measurements are calculated in degrees for each direction It can be done by creating a dynamic environment for the measurement of fall risk on the same platform .

Secondary outcomes

  1. Berg Balance Scala

    Time frame: day 0 (before intervention)

    It is a 14-item clinical scale evaluating static and dynamic equilibrium abilities, each section rated from 0 (poor) to 4 (best). The highest score is 56. A score of less than 45 is an indicator of addiction in daily life. Evaluates the level of dependence and / or independence during positions such as standing up from sitting, standing with feet adjacent, standing in tandem position, staying in balance on one leg and ability to change position. The highest scores indicate the best balance score.

  2. Berg Balance Scala

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    It is a 14-item clinical scale evaluating static and dynamic equilibrium abilities, each section rated from 0 (poor) to 4 (best). The highest score is 56. A score of less than 45 is an indicator of addiction in daily life. Evaluates the level of dependence and / or independence during positions such as standing up from sitting, standing with feet adjacent, standing in tandem position, staying in balance on one leg and ability to change position. The highest scores indicate the best balance score

  3. Berg Balance Scala

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    It is a 14-item clinical scale evaluating static and dynamic equilibrium abilities, each section rated from 0 (poor) to 4 (best). The highest score is 56. A score of less than 45 is an indicator of addiction in daily life. Evaluates the level of dependence and / or independence during positions such as standing up from sitting, standing with feet adjacent, standing in tandem position, staying in balance on one leg and ability to change position. The highest scores indicate the best balance score

  4. Berg Balance

    Time frame: 16 weeks

    It is a 14-item clinical scale evaluating static and dynamic equilibrium abilities, each section rated from 0 (poor) to 4 (best). The highest score is 56. A score of less than 45 is an indicator of addiction in daily life. Evaluates the level of dependence and / or independence during positions such as standing up from sitting, standing with feet adjacent, standing in tandem position, staying in balance on one leg and ability to change position. The highest scores indicate the best balance score

  5. 30 Second Chair Stand Test

    Time frame: day 0 (before intervention)

    A test that assesses the person's sit-up activity, lower extremity strength and dynamic balance. Number of sitting and getting up in 30 seconds is noted.

  6. 30 Second Chair Stand Test

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    A test that assesses the person's sit-up activity, lower extremity strength and dynamic balance. Number of sitting and getting up in 30 seconds is noted.

  7. 30 Second Chair Stand Test

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    A test that assesses the person's sit-up activity, lower extremity strength and dynamic balance. Number of sitting and getting up in 30 seconds is noted.

  8. 30 Second Chair Stand Test

    Time frame: 16 weeks

    A test that assesses the person's sit-up activity, lower extremity strength and dynamic balance. Number of sitting and getting up in 30 seconds is noted.

  9. Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Test

    Time frame: day 0 (before intervention)

    Consists of 6 different diameter and equal length monofilments. The test of the sense of touch by questioning whether the person feels the monofilament touches while their eyes are closed.

  10. Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Test

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    Consists of 6 different diameter and equal length monofilments. The test of the sense of touch by questioning whether the person feels the monofilament touches while their eyes are closed.

  11. Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Test

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Consists of 6 different diameter and equal length monofilments. The test of the sense of touch by questioning whether the person feels the monofilament touches while their eyes are closed.

  12. Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Test

    Time frame: 16 weeks

    Consists of 6 different diameter and equal length monofilments. The test of the sense of touch by questioning whether the person feels the monofilament touches while their eyes are closed.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

muyesser cavlak

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Oct 28, 2019
Registry last updated
Aug 11, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.