Hasan Sadikin General Hospital
Bandung, West Java, 20161, Indonesia
NCT Number: NCT06814288
Keloids are benign fibrous tissue overgrowths that extend beyond the boundaries of the original wound and tend to recur after therapy. The exact pathogenesis of keloids is not fully understood; however, the role of TGF-β leads to an imbalance in collagen synthesis and degradation, while VEGF increases vascularity. Enhanced vascularity contributes to increased fibroblast activity. Angiogenesis is heightened in wounds subjected to high tension. Active keloids are characterized by low vascular velocity, low elasticity, and varied echogenicity depending on the filling tissue, as observed on ultrasonographic examination. Intralesional TA injections at 40 mg/ml are an available option for keloids, but this therapy is associated with various side effects. Intralesional TB-A injections at 5 U/cm³ have been reported to demonstrate good efficacy, safety, tolerable side effects, and high patient satisfaction for keloid management. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a study comparing the effectiveness of intralesional TB-A injections at 5 U/cm³ with intralesional TA injections at 40 mg/ml in keloid patients. Scar assessment can generally be conducted objectively using various tools or subjectively through different measurement scales. The Japan Scar Workshop (JSW) developed a measurement scale known as the JSW scar scale (JSS).
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Bandung, West Java, 20161, Indonesia
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of intralesional TB-A injections at 5 U/cm³ compared to intralesional TA injections at 40 mg/ml in keloid patients in Indonesia, assessed using the Japan Scar Scale (JSS) and measurements of lesion volume, vascularization degree, vascular velocity, elasticity, and echogenicity through high-resolution ultrasonography. Such research has not been conducted before.
The study design is an experimental single-blind randomized trial with a pretest-posttest design. Participants include keloid patients seeking treatment at the Tumor and Dermatologic Surgery Clinic, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, RSHS Bandung, who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Lesions and treatments are randomized by the researchers, and the selected treatment is then administered to the keloid lesions. Observations are repeated to evaluate the effectiveness of the therapy using JSS and high-resolution ultrasonography.
During patient visits, the following procedures are conducted:
History Taking and Physical Examination Patients undergo anamnesis and a thorough physical examination.
Baseline Keloid Lesion Measurement Initial lesion measurements are performed using a caliper to establish baseline data before therapy.
Elasticity Measurement Baseline lesion elasticity is measured using the Cutometer MPA 580 at the midpoint of each lesion. Skin erythema is assessed using the CM-700d Spectrophotometer.
High-Resolution Ultrasonography Assessment
A radiology specialist performs the ultrasonography using a Phillips EPIQ Elite® high-resolution ultrasound device with a linear transducer at 22 MHz. The machine's automatic settings for observing superficial structures are applied uniformly across cases.
Patients are positioned upright or lying down, depending on lesion location. The transducer is placed perpendicularly to the keloid lesion in both transverse and longitudinal orientations without applying pressure.
Measurements include lesion volume, vascularization degree, vascular velocity, elasticity, and echogenicity type.
Documentation involves recording data and capturing images on the ultrasound machine.
Photographic Documentation Lesions are photographed from the top and side for documentation.
Randomization and Group Assignment
Lesions are randomly assigned to one of two therapy groups:
Group I: Intralesional Botulinum Toxin A injection at 5 U/cm³. Group II: Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide injection at 40 mg/ml. These detailed procedures ensure a comprehensive evaluation of the comparative efficacy of the two treatments in managing keloid lesions.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Twenty keloid patients will be injected botulinum toxin A intralesional every 4 weeks.
Twenty keloid patients will be injected triamcinolone acetonide intralesional every 4 weeks.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Evaluation for Groups I and II is conducted every four weeks, specifically in the 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks. At each visit, assessments of JSS for evaluation consists of six items: (1) Induration, (2) Elevation, (3) Redness of the scar, (4) Erythema around the scar, (5) Spontaneous and pressing pain, and (6) Itch. Each item has four intensity categories, namely, None, Weak, Mild, and Strong. These categories are weighted 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. There are sample images of each category in each item that helps the user judge the items. The minimum and maximum total points in the evaluation table are thus 0 and 18, respectively. When the symptoms improve, the total score decreases.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Lesion volume in mililiters (ml) are measured by high-resolution ultrasonography on the initial visit (before therapy) and week-12 (after therapy)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Elasticity ratio between keloid lesion and normal skin are measured by cutometer and high-resolution ultrasonography on the initial visit (before therapy) and week-12 (after therapy)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Echogenicity of keloid lesion are measured by high-resolution ultrasonography on the initial visit (before therapy) and week-12 (after therapy)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Degree of Vascularity of keloid lesion are measured by high-resolution ultrasonography on the initial visit (before therapy) and week-12 (after therapy)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Evaluation for Groups I and II is conducted every four weeks, specifically in the 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks. At each visit, assessments of VAS for therapy evaluation
Time frame: 12 weeks
Evaluation of any adverse effects for Groups I and II is conducted every four weeks, specifically in the 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks
Universitas Padjadjaran
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07718269
Cicatrix, Cicatrix, Hypertrophic
Alexandria, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07336368
Cicatrix, Cicatrix, Hypertrophic
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06751433
Acceptability Study, Cicatrix
Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT06897969
Cicatrix, Collagen Diseases
Multan, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details