alexandria University Hospital
Alexandria, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07718269
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the efficacy and safety of microneedling-assisted 5-fluorouracil delivery in comparison with intralesional 5-fluorouracil, intralesional corticosteroid, and microneedling with saline for the treatment of pathological scars.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Alexandria, Egypt
Hypertrophic scars and keloids are dermal fibroproliferative disorders unique to humans. They are common and usually occur following burns, trauma, inflammation, or surgery, but sometimes occur spontaneously. Despite an array of therapeutic approaches for scar therapy such as surgical excision, occlusive dressings, topical and intralesional corticosteroids, interferon, cryosurgery, radiation, pressure therapy, laser therapy, retinoic acid, and silicone gel sheeting, no single method provides complete benefit. For this reason, the medical care of HTSs and keloids remains clinically challenging. The study was conducted on 60 patients complaining of HTSs & keloids.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undiluted 5-FU was applied topically after microneedling
undiluted 5-fluorouracil was applied topically
Triamcinolone acetonide was administered intralesionally
saline was applied after microneedling
Time frame: 3 weeks
To detect the Change in scar severity assessed by the Vancouver Scar Scale based on four scar characteristics (vascularity 0-3, pliability 0-5, height 0-3, pigmentation 0-2) with the minimum total score 0 (normal) and the maximum total score 13 (most severe scar). Higher scores after treatment mean worse outcome.
Time frame: 3 weeks
To objectively assess scar surface area. To quantify treatment effect, the percentage of change in scar area was calculated for each patient using the formula:
■("Percentage of change=" ("Post treatment area - Baseline area" /"Baseline area" )"×100" ), Higher scores mean worse outcomes.
Time frame: 3 weeks
grade 0 (No satisfaction), grade I (poor less than 25%), grade II (fair 25-50%), grade III (Good 51-75%) and grade IV (Excellent 76-100%). The minimum total score 0 and the maximum total score 100. The higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: 3 weeks
to assess pain and pruritus. The minimum score is 0 indicated no pain or itching and the maximum score 10 represented the most severe pain or itching. The higher score mean a worse outcome
Alexandria University
Other
Microneedling With 5-Fluorouracil Versus Intralesional 5-Fluorouracil or Corticosteroids for Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids
Acronym: MIST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07336368
Cicatrix, Cicatrix, Hypertrophic
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06751433
Acceptability Study, Cicatrix
Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT06897969
Cicatrix, Collagen Diseases
Multan, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT06814288
Cicatrix, Collagen Diseases
Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
View Trial Details