Alireza Baradaran Raffiee
Tehran, Tehran Province, 16666, Iran
NCT Number: NCT00370955
The purpose of this study is to compare two surgical techniques (high vacuum and low vacuum) on corneal endothelium after phacoemulsification.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tehran, Tehran Province, 16666, Iran
Patients aged 50 to 70 years old with moderate lens opacities (nuclear sclerosis of 3+) were included. The exclusion criteria were: 1-previous corneal pathology (dystrophic or degenerative such as Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy or advanced trachoma), 2- pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX), 3- history of intra ocular surgery, 4- glaucoma or ocular hypertension, 5- eyes with a history of anterior uveitis, 6- diabetes mellitus, 7- anterior chamber depth (ACD) less than 2.5 mm or more than 4 mm, 8- axial length less than 21 mm or more than 25 mm, 9- density of endothelial cells less than 1500 cells per mm2, 10- polymegatism (CV > 0.4), 11- keratometric astigmatism more than 1.5 Diopters (D), 12- history of contact lens usage, 13- Intra-operative complications (posterior capsule rupture with or without vitreous loss), 14- postoperative uveitis, 15- postoperative surgical wound leakage, 16- deep-set eye, and 17- size of dilated pupil less than 6 mm. Nucleus density was evaluated using the LOCS III classification system Patients were divided in 2 groups randomly: Group 1 included those candidates for phacoemulsification using high hydrodynamic parameter: 400 mmHg vacuum and 40 ml/min flow rate (high vacuum technique) whereas group 2 consisted of patients who underwent phacoemulsification using low hydrodynamic parameters: 200 mmHg vacuum and 20 ml/min flow rate (low vacuum technique). All surgeries were performed by one surgeon using stop and chop technique with sovereign (white star technology) (AMO, USA). During sculpting stage, vacuum was 40mmHg and flow rate is 20ml/min, in both groups. Irrigation aspiration of cortical material and viscoelastic were bimanually and semi automatically performed with flow rate of 30ml/min.
Total ultrasound power and total volume of BSS in both groups were measured. Pachymetry, endothelial cell density, polymegathism, before and 1, 6 and 12 weeks after intervention were also evaluated. Statistically analysis of data included univariate (student t-test and x2) and multivariate (regression model) analysis of postoperative results.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
were:
The exclusion criteria were:
All surgeries were performed using Sovereign phacoemulsification system (AMO) using Whitestar technology.
Other names: stop and chop technique
Time frame: All patients were examined on postoperative day 1 and weeks 1, 6 and 12.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05529485
Cataract, Corneal Diseases
Metz, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04396301
Cataract, Corneal Diseases
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05587205
Cataract, Corneal Diseases
Mexico City, Mexico
View Trial DetailsNCT07735000
Age Related Cataract, Cataract
Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
View Trial Details