Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02835625

The Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Trial in Bergen

Compare synthetic mammography+digital breast tomosynthesis (SM+DBT) with digital mammography (DM) as a screening tool for women aged 50-69 years, invited to participate in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program at the screening unit in Bergen, Norway, with regard to early performance measures, including prognostic and predictive tumor characteristics, radiation doses and cost-effectiveness.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

48 year–71 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway

Loading trial locations.

About this study

DBT is a new screening tool, argued to be better than standard DM. This statement is based on a lower recall rate, and a higher rate of early-stage screen-detected cancer. No studies have so far reported results from women screened with DBT from GE Healthcare, as far as the investigators know. DBT from GE offer synthetic two-dimensional DM generated from the DBT data (SM), and studies have shown similar detection rates for this technique as of adjacent DM. By comparing results of early performance measures and economic aspects in two comparable populations of women in the same age group, residing in the same county, the investigators can measure the effect of SM+DBT versus standard DM with equipment from GE Healthcare. The populations will be examined by the same radiographers, screen-read by the same radiologists, histologically breast cancer proven by the same pathologists, and treated by the same surgeons and oncologists.

A prospective cohort study targeting 45,000 women invited to breast cancer screening in Bergen, Hordaland in the study period, 2016-2018, will be performed. A screening participation of approximately 75% is expected. All attending women will be asked if they are willing to participate in the study after receiving written and oral information about the study. Women willing to participate in the study will sign an informed consent. Of the attending women it is expected that about 90-95% will consent to participate in the study. The women will be randomized into two groups, a study group and a control group. The randomization will take place at the screening unit in Bergen. The outcome of the randomization is based on the 11-digit personal identification number assigned to every citizen in Norway. In the study group, the women will be screened with SM+DBT. In the control group, the women will be screened with DM. Women not willing to participate in the study will be screened with DM, and not included in our study.

The investigators aim to address the following topics and research questions:

  • Study 1: Early performance measures in a population based screening program using SM+DBT versus DM - interim analyses.
  • Study 2: Use of SM+DBT versus DM in a population based screening program - a randomized controlled trial.
  • Study 3: Prognostic and predictive histopathologic characteristics of breast tumors detected in a population based program using SM+DBT versus DM.
  • Study 4: SM+DBT and DM in a populations based screening program - which technology has the highest sensitivity for women with mammographic dense breast?
  • Study 5 and 6: Costs of SM+DBT and DM in a populations based screening program - is SM+DBT cost-effective?

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Breast implants

Treatment and study plan

Synthetic Mammography + Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

Radiation

Two-view tomosynthesis performed with GE Senoclaire 3D Breast Tomosynthesis.

Other names: SM+DBT

Digital mammography

Radiation

Two-view digital mammography performed with GE Senoclaire 3D Breast Tomosynthesis.

Other names: DM

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Screen-Detected Breast Cancer

    Time frame: 36 months from start up of the trial

    Comparison of rates of screen-detected breast cancer in tomosynthesis versus digital mammography as performed in a population based screening program.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number and Percentage of Participants Screen-Detected Breast Cancer Among Participants Recalled for Further Assesment

    Time frame: 36 months from start up of the trial

    Positive predictive value of recalls (number of screen-detected breast cancer among participants recalled for further assesment) for tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population based screening program.

  2. Number of Participants Recalled for Further Assesment Due to Mammographic Findings

    Time frame: 36 months from start up of the trial

    Comparison of rate of recall for further assesment due to mammographic findings in tomosynthesis versus digital mammography as performed in a population based screening program.

  3. Incremental Costs of Screening With Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography

    Time frame: 36 months from start up of the trial

    The incremental cost per woman screened with digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program.

  4. Prognostic and Predictive Tumor Characteristics for Screen-Detected Breast Cancer

    Time frame: 36 months from start up of the trial

    Distribution of characteristics among the women diagnosed with breast cancer screened with tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population based screening program.

  5. Number of Participants With Interval Breast Cancer

    Time frame: 60 months from start up of the trial

    Rate of interval breast cancer among those screened with tomosynthesis versus digital mammography as performed in a population based screening program.

Other outcomes

  1. Time Spent on Screen-Reading and Consensus Meetings

    Time frame: 24 months from start up of the trial

    The time spent on screen-reading and consensus will be compared for tomosynthesis versus digital mammography

  2. Mammographic Features of Screen-Detected Breast Cancer

    Time frame: 36 months from start up of the trial

    Distribution of characteristics among the women diagnosed with breast cancer screened with tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population based screening program.

  3. Radiation Doses When Screening With Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography

    Time frame: 24 months from start up of the trial

    Radiation doses will be measured for screening with tomosynthesis and digital mammography by an automated software, in milligray (mGy).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Norwegian Institute of Public Health

Other Gov

Collaborators

  • Haukeland University Hospital
  • The Research Council of Norway
  • University of Oslo

Registry information

Official study title

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis - The Future Screening Tool for Breast Cancer?

Acronym: TOBE

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jul 18, 2016
Registry last updated
Aug 28, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.