Nasal Swab
ProcedureWill be obtained by the physiotherapist in:
- Expectorating CF patients
- Non-expectorating CF patients
- Bronchoscopy CF patients
NCT Number: NCT02363764
Accurate identification of lower respiratory tract pathogens is standard of care in the management of CF patients and it is therefore recommended to perform regular bacterial cultures, at least once a year, but some even recommend monthly cultures. This can be done through different methods, of which sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) are the gold standard. However, BAL is an invasive method, not designated to repeat monthly. Therefore, the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections can be challenging in the non-expectorating CF patient. Other methods, such as induced sputum (IS), cough swabs and nasal swabs, have been developed to obtain bacterial cultures in these patients. Studies have investigated the reliability of these different sampling methods, however, with controversial conclusions.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Observational
I. Protocol design:
The current protocol is designed to compare:
II. Flow chart:
III. Analysis of the samples:
(Induced) Sputum samples, cough and nasal swabs are aseptically collected in the appropriate disposable and are immediately sent to the Laboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control of the Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, where analyses are carried out within 24h post-sampling.
These analyses include:
IV. Statistical analysis:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Will be obtained by the physiotherapist in:
Will be obtained by the physiotherapist in:
Will be obtained by the physiotherapist in:
Will be obtained by the physiotherapist in:
Will be obtained by the pulmonologist in:
Completing questionnaire on acceptability of different sampling methods by patients >6 years of age
Time frame: 2 years
Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicted value of different sampling methods
Time frame: Questionnaire: day of sampling, Analysis: 2 years
If no differences are observed between sampling methods, which method would be preferred by the patient?
Time frame: Questionnaire: day of sampling, Analysis: 2 years
Is there any pain experienced? If so, how much? --> VAS
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02715921
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Cystic Fibrosis
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04798014
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Cystic Fibrosis
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03938324
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05453578
Bacterial Disease Carrier, Bacterial Infections
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details