Surgical management
ProcedureOther names: Arm 1: clipping
NCT Number: NCT01139892
Purpose:
Phase 1: (Pilot Phase)
To compare the treatment efficacy of surgical clipping and endovascular coiling for unruptured intracranial aneurysms.
To obtain better estimates of morbidity and mortality related to a surgical or endovascular treatment strategy at one year within the context of an RCT.
To show that an RCT comparing the morbidity and mortality of a surgical management strategy to an endovascular management strategy is feasible.
Phase 2:
To compare the results of surgical and endovascular management strategies, in terms of:
1. Overall mortality and morbidity at 1 and 5 years. 2. The clinical efficacy and safety of a surgical or endovascular management strategy at 1 and 5 years
Hypotheses: Phase 1 Hypotheses:
1. Surgical clipping of intradural, saccular, unruptured intracranial aneurysms is superior to endovascular management in terms of a lesser number of patients experiencing treatment failure. 2. An RCT comparing the clinical outcomes of a surgical versus endovascular management strategy is feasible.
Phase 1 Primary End-points:
• Treatment failure, hereby defined as having occurred when either: the intended initial modality (surgical or endovascular) fails to occlude the aneurysm, a "major" (saccular) angiographic aneurysm recurrence is found, or an intracranial hemorrhagic event occurs during the 1-year follow-up period.
Phase 1 Secondary End-points:
1. Overall morbidity and mortality at one year. 2. Occurrence of morbidity (mRS >2) or mortality following treatment. 3. Occurrence of failure of aneurysm occlusion using the initial intended treatment modality. 4. Occurrence of a "major" (saccular) angiographic aneurysm recurrence. 5. Occurrence of an intracranial hemorrhage following treatment. 6. Peri-treatment hospitalization lasting more than 5 days 7. Discharge following treatment to a location other than home
Treatment:
Trial feasibility, or the capacity for patient recruitment, would require enrollment of at least 8 patients per actively recruiting center per year.
Phase 2 Hypotheses:
It may be too early to explicitly define the primary hypothesis of Phase 2, however, the intent of Phase 2 can be expressed as:
1. One management strategy is superior to the other in terms of clinical outcome at five years. 2. One management strategy is superior to the other in terms of clinical efficacy at five years.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: Arm 1: clipping
Other names: Arm 2: coiling
Time frame: One Year
Defined as having occurred when either: the intended initial modality (surgical or endovascular) fails to occlude the aneurysm, a "major" (saccular) angiographic aneurysm recurrence is found, or an intracranial hemorrhagic event occurs during the 1-year follow-up period.
Time frame: one year
Overall morbidity and mortality at one year. Morbidity = modified Rankin scale score >2. The Modified Rankin Scale score will be determined by an independent health-care professional, not directly involved in the CURES study, and blinded to treatment allocation.
Time frame: 6 weeks post-treatment
Occurrence of morbidity (mRS >2) or mortality following treatment. The Modified Rankin Scale score will be determined by an independent health-care professional, not directly involved in the CURES study, and blinded to treatment allocation.
Time frame: 1 year
Occurrence of failure of aneurysm occlusion using the initial intended treatment modality as determined by the local treating physician. Patients left with clinically concerning aneurysm residuals (in the opinion of the treating physician) after the treatment attempt will count as a failure of the initial treatment.
In the surgically-treated patients, the surgeon's judgment of whether or not the aneurysm is fully occluded with the clip will be used to determine failure of aneurysm occlusion. Because the primary end-points in Phase 1 is a composite end-point, it does not distinguish between aneurysm remnants found immediately post-treatment (failure to completely occlude the aneurysm) and recurrences (or residuals) found at one-year post-treatment. Even if a surgically-treated aneurysm felt to be completely occluded by the surgeon is in fact inadequately treated, this will be found at the one year follow-up imaging mark, and thus does not constitute a source of bias.
Time frame: 1 year
Occurrence of a "major" (saccular) angiographic aneurysm recurrence.
Time frame: 1 year
Determined using non-invasive angiography (CTA or MRA) performed at 12 +/- 2 months post-treatment, with all images sent to CURES headquarters for Core Lab confirmation. This follow-up imaging is considered to be part of normal follow-up after aneurysm treatment. Although CTA and MRA are known to have different sensitivities in detecting aneurysm remnants, both modalities are equally well-suited to the discovery of what we are looking for: a concerning, saccular aneurysm residual or remnant. Because the definition of "major", "concerning", or "saccular" aneurysm residual or remnant remains subjective, (as does the threshold for re-treatment) local investigators will be requested to record the occurrence of what they consider to be a "major" saccular recurrence, but the final determination of this end-point will be determined by an independent Core Lab.
Time frame: 6-weeks post-treatment
This end-point will be recorded by the local treating physician on discharge.
Time frame: 6-weeks post-treatment
This end-point will be recorded by the local treating physician on discharge.
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Other
Canadian Study on the Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Versus Surgical Treatment. A Randomized Comparison of Clinical and Angiographic Results of Intracranial Aneurysms
Acronym: CURES
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04566263
Aneurysm, Brain Diseases
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01541254
Aneurysm, Brain Diseases
Albany, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01793792
Aneurysm, Brain Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06989931
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Aneurysm
Zhangzhou, Fujian, China
View Trial Details