Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07195045

Thai PainPREDICT Validation Study

Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is one of the most common and disabling complications of diabetes mellitus, substantially affecting quality of life, daily functioning, and health system burden. Early identification of PDN is crucial for timely treatment, prevention of complications such as foot ulcers and amputations, and for reducing healthcare costs. However, in Thailand there are limited culturally adapted and validated tools for screening PDN. PainPREDICT is an internationally validated questionnaire designed to characterize neuropathic pain profiles, but its adaptation for Thai patients has not yet been undertaken. In parallel, the use of mobile health technologies (mHealth) has the potential to expand access to screening and monitoring of chronic conditions, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

About this study

This study aims to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the PainPREDICT questionnaire for the Thai population, and to integrate it into a mobile application for use in both clinical and community settings. The study is structured into three phases. Phase 1 involves forward-backward translation of PainPREDICT into Thai, with expert panel review, pilot testing, and psychometric validation. Reliability will be assessed using internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients, while validity will be examined through correlations with existing neuropathic pain measures (e.g., DN4) and neurophysiological studies (nerve conduction study, quantitative sensory testing). Phase 2 focuses on the design, development, and usability testing of a mobile application embedding the Thai PainPREDICT questionnaire. Clinicians and patients will test the application, and usability will be assessed with the System Usability Scale and qualitative interviews. Phase 3 evaluates diagnostic accuracy and real-world usability in 200-300 patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, including subgroup analysis in resource-limited settings. Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, ROC AUC) will be compared with physician diagnosis and objective neurophysiological tests.

Eligible participants are adults (≥18 years) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who are able to communicate in Thai and provide informed consent. Patients with neuropathy from non-diabetic causes or significant cognitive impairment will be excluded. Recruitment will take place at Chula Neuroscience Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, and affiliated diabetes clinics. The study anticipates enrolling approximately 277 participants, which provides adequate power for psychometric validation and diagnostic accuracy testing. Both PDN patients and diabetic controls without PDN will be included to enable comparative analysis.

The primary outcome is the reliability and validity of the Thai PainPREDICT questionnaire for PDN screening. Secondary outcomes include usability of the mobile application, diagnostic accuracy compared with clinical and neurophysiological standards, and effectiveness in increasing PDN detection in resource-limited settings. The study also seeks to generate evidence on patient and provider satisfaction with the mobile platform. Data will be collected securely, stored in REDCap, and managed in compliance with Thai data protection regulations (PDPA 2019). Ethical approval will be obtained from the Institutional Review Board, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and written informed consent will be required from all participants.

The expected benefit of this project is the development of a reliable and culturally valid Thai version of PainPREDICT, coupled with an accessible mobile application. This tool is anticipated to facilitate earlier detection of PDN, improve patient management pathways, and reduce disparities in access to care across Thailand. The study will also provide a model for adapting digital health screening tools for other populations with high diabetes burden. Ultimately, the project aims to strengthen evidence-based screening and management of neuropathic pain, improve patient quality of life, and contribute to the broader application of mHealth in chronic disease management.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus or type 2 diabetes mellitus.
  • Able to communicate in Thai.
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of neuropathy due to other causes (e.g., alcohol, chemotherapy, HIV, other systemic diseases).
  • Significant cognitive impairment or neurological conditions that prevent comprehension of the questionnaire.
  • Severe psychiatric illness that interferes with study participation.

Treatment and study plan

Thai PainPREDICT Questionnaire and Mobile Application

Diagnostic Test

The Thai PainPREDICT Questionnaire is a culturally adapted and validated version of an internationally recognized neuropathic pain assessment tool. In this study, it is administered via both paper form and a secure mobile application designed for Thai patients with diabetes. The app automates scoring, provides real-time feedback, and securely stores data in REDCap in compliance with Thai Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA). The intervention is used to screen for painful diabetic neuropathy and compare results against clinical diagnosis and neurophysiological testing, including DN4, nerve conduction studies, and quantitative sensory testing.

Other names: PainPREDICT (Thai Version), PainPREDICT App

Primary outcomes

  1. Reliability and Validity of Thai PainPREDICT Questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline through 12 months (Phases 1 and 2)

    Reliability will be assessed by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients. Validity will be examined by correlation with other neuropathic pain questionnaires (DN4, NPSI), construct validity, and diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, ROC AUC) compared with clinical diagnosis and neurophysiological testing.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Usability of the Thai PainPREDICT Mobile Application

    Time frame: Months 7-15 (Phase 2)

    System Usability Scale (SUS) score and qualitative interviews with clinicians and patients to assess ease of use, clarity, efficiency, and satisfaction with the application.

  2. Diagnostic Accuracy of Thai PainPREDICT Questionnaire in Clinical Setting

    Time frame: Months 16-26 (Phase 3)

    Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and ROC AUC of the Thai PainPREDICT questionnaire administered via the mobile application compared with physician diagnosis and neurophysiological tests (NCS, QST).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jakkrit Amornvit, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+66622169338

Tharadon Deepracha, MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

+66622169338

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chulalongkorn University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Thai Version of PainPREDICT: Translation, Validation, and Mobile Application Development for Screening Painful Diabetic Neuropathy in Diabetes Patients

Acronym: PainPREDICT-Th

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Sep 26, 2025
Registry last updated
Oct 3, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.