TDF
DrugTenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF; TDF) 300 mg tablet administered orally once daily
Other names: Viread®
NCT Number: NCT00737568
The aim of therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) is to maintain suppression of viral replication to prevent the emergence of complications, which requires long-term therapy. Durable suppression of viral replication is achieved in the treatment of chronic viral diseases by preventing of the emergence of drug-resistant mutations. The clinical guidelines for the management of lamivudine resistant patients are variable. Some recommend switching to another agent without cross-resistance, while others recommend adding on another agent without cross-resistance. Limited clinical data exists to demonstrate whether tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF; TDF) is an effective monotherapy for lamivudine resistant patients or if it should be used as part of a combination therapy regimen.
This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of tenofovir DF monotherapy versus emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir DF combination therapy in participants with chronic HBV with lamivudine resistance (presence of the rtM204I/V mutation with or without the rtL180M mutation) over a 240-week period. Participants in this study must be receiving lamivudine treatment at the time of enrollment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Innsbruck, Austria
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF; TDF) 300 mg tablet administered orally once daily
Other names: Viread®
Emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF 200/300 mg fixed-dose combination tablet administered orally once daily
Other names: Truvada®
TDF placebo tablet administered orally once daily
FTC/TDF placebo tablet administered orally once daily
Time frame: Week 96
Time frame: Weeks 48, 144, 192, and 240
Time frame: Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Time frame: Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Time frame: Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
Normal ALT was defined as having a value less than or equal to the ULN. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
The percentage of participants who were HBeAg positive at baseline and who had HBeAg Loss at the given time point was summarized. Loss of HBeAg was defined as change of detectable HBeAg from positive to negative.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
The percentage of participants who were HBeAg positive at baseline and who had seroconversion to anti-HBe at the given time point was summarized. Seroconversion to anti-HBe was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative to positive.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
The percentage of participants with HBsAg Loss at the given time point was summarized. Loss of HBsAg was defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
The percentage of participants with seroconversion to anti-HBs at the given time point was summarized. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative to positive.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240
The percentage of participants with virologic breakthrough at the given time point was summarized. Virologic breakthrough was defined as having two consecutive 1.0 log10 or greater increases in serum HBV DNA from on-treatment nadir, or two consecutive HBV DNA values ≥ 400 copies/mL after being < 400 copies/mL.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, and 240
BMD is calculated as grams per cubic centimeter (g/cm^2); the mean (SD) percentage change is presented.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192, and 240
BMD is calculated as g/cm^2; the mean (SD) percentage change is presented.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 240
The development of DRMs was summarized, either as development of new DRMs or enrichment of existing DRMs.
Gilead Sciences
Industry
A Phase 3b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study Evaluating the Antiviral Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (DF) Monotherapy Versus Emtricitabine Plus Tenofovir DF Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy in Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B Who Are Resistant to Lamivudine
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02766933
Adenocarcinoma, Blood-Borne Infections
Bamenda, Northwest, Cameroon
View Trial DetailsNCT04676724
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04449029
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03020745
Blood-Borne Infections, Chronic Disease
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial Details