Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
NCT Number: NCT04039971
In primary pediatric Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the quadriceps tendon with either tendon and patellar bone or an all-tendon graft is commonly employed. However, no randomized control trial has sought to discern the superior graft option in regards to both short-term and long-term patient outcomes.The purpose of this study is to assess the differences between these two widely used surgical techniques in ACL reconstruction by examining short, intermediate, and long term outcomes of both approaches.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me12 year–19 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
It is well known that ACL injuries are among the most common sports and knee injuries. As a result, ACL reconstruction is at the forefront both in terms of research and development and advancements in technique. One focus of research is graft choice and the risks and benefits associated with each. There are multiple valid graft choices including bone-patellar tendon-bone, hamstring tendon, quadriceps tendon, quadriceps tendon-patellar bone, and allograft. Graft choice is often patient centered and based on both patient and surgeon considerations such as age, sex, activity level, surgeon preference and graft associated complications.
The present study seeks to compare the intraoperative, immediate perioperative, intermediate and long-term outcomes between tendon-bone and all-soft-tissue quadriceps tendon autograft in ACL reconstruction in adolescent patients. The investigators will analyze data on operative time, cost, complications, recovery of strength and range of motion, return to sports rates, patient reported outcomes, and failure rates. With this proposal the investigators hope to determine if there is a superior graft technique in this population. Both graft types are validated in the literature separately as options for ACL reconstruction in this age group. There has been no clinical research comparing the two graft types, and therefore no consensus is made among surgeons on whether to use tendon-bone or all-soft-tissue when it comes to the QT autograft. A secondary aim of this study is to obtain patient reported outcomes throughout the post-operative period to determine if the patient experience is different between the two graft types. This data may be used in guiding a surgeon's decision on which type to use with their patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Surgical techniques
Time frame: 1 to 2 years
Graft superiority will be evaluated by the time to return to sports and the length of return to sports.
Time frame: 5 years
Long-term graft superiority will be evaluated by graft failure rate or ACL re-rupture.
Time frame: Pre-operative appointment, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 5 years post-operative appointments
Patients will complete a survey at specific time points to gauge knee function throughout treatment.
Time frame: As recorded in post-operative physical therapy visits (approx. 6 months to 1 year)
Time to return to sports will be evaluated based on physical therapy milestones related to return to sports clearance.
University of Colorado, Denver
Other
Quadriceps Tendon Autograft, Tendon-Bone Versus All-Soft-Tissue for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Patient-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06524349
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Fargo, North Dakota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06511232
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05501210
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT04295148
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden
View Trial Details