Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00609505

Telemedicine vs. Face-to-Face Cancer Genetic Counseling

Cancer genetic counseling (CGC) has been found to have "substantial" benefits for individuals with breast cancer and their family members; it has been deemed by multiple organizations as "standard of care" for women with breast cancer and their relatives. Unfortunately, there is a disparity in access to CGC, especially among women who live in rural and underserved areas. In North Carolina, only two cancer genetic counselors practice in rural clinics - each only for a few days per month. Therefore, in an effort to make CGC more widely available in a timely manner, we propose to test provision of counseling through telemedicine (TM), in which a patient and health care provider communicate with each other using videoconferencing. In 4 rural oncology clinics, we will implement low-cost TM and compare satisfaction and cost-effectiveness between groups of women designated to have their CGC session by TM or FTF. We'll use a validated measure to assess satisfaction by a phone survey one week after the CGC appointment; cost-effectiveness will be measured at project's end by calculating length of wait time for appointment and costs of equipment, labor, and mileage. Study hypothesis: TM is as satisfactory as FTF counseling and is a more cost-effective way to provide this beneficial service.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals referred for cancer genetic counseling (e.g., by medical oncologist, primary care physician or self) in one of 4 oncology clinics: Gibson Cancer Center in Lumberton, NC; Scotland Cancer Treatment Center in Laurinburg, NC; Johnston Cancer Center in Smithfield, NC; and Maria Parham Cancer Center in Henderson, NC.
  • Willing to be randomized to receive counseling via telemedicine or face-to-face.

Exclusion criteria

  • Referred for cancer genetic counseling from any clinic other than the 4 listed above.
  • Unwilling to be randomized to receive counseling via telemedicine or face-to-face.

Treatment and study plan

Telemedicine

Other

Telemedicine genetic counseling

Face-to-face

Other

Face-to-face genetic counseling

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient satisfaction

    Time frame: One week post-intervention (genetic counseling session)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cost-effectiveness

    Time frame: Enrollment completion

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Duke University

Other

Collaborators

  • Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation

Registry information

Official study title

Telemedicine vs. Face-to-Face Cancer Genetic Counseling in Rural Oncology Clinics

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Feb 7, 2008
Registry last updated
Feb 22, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.