Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02019420

Tedizolid Phosphate (TR-701 FA, MK-1986) vs Linezolid for the Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia (MK-1986-002)

This is a 1:1 ratio, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, global Phase 3 study of tedizolid phosphate (TR-701 FA) 200 mg intravenous (IV) once daily for 7 days versus linezolid (Zyvox®, Zyvoxid®, etc) 600 mg IV every 12 hours for 10 days for the treatment of ventilated participants with presumed gram-positive hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), collectively referred to as ventilated nosocomial pneumonia (VNP). Participants with concurrent gram-positive bacteremia are to receive 14 days of active therapy in either treatment arm.

The primary objective is to determine the noninferiority (NI) in all-cause mortality (ACM) within 28 days after randomization of IV tedizolid phosphate compared with IV linezolid in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Analysis Set (NI is declared when the lower bound of the 95% CI > -10).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Requires IV antibiotic therapy with diagnosis of ventilated nosocomial pneumonia
  • Gram-positive bacteria on respiratory Gram stain

Exclusion criteria

  • Pneumonia of community, viral, fungal or parasitic etiology
  • Structural lung abnormalities
  • Immunosuppression
  • Previous antibiotics for > 24 hours
  • Expected survival of < 72 hours

Treatment and study plan

Tedizolid phosphate

Drug

Tedizolid phosphate IV 200 mg once daily

Other names: SIVEXTRO®, TR-701 FA, MK-1986

Linezolid

Drug

Linezolid IV 600 mg twice daily

Other names: ZYVOX®

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With All-Cause Mortality in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

    The numbers of participants with all-cause mortality within 28 days after randomization was determined in the ITT population. Any participants who were lost to follow-up and not known to be alive or deceased by Day 28 were imputed as deceased.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With All-Cause Mortality in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

    The numbers of participants with all-cause mortality within 28 days after randomization was determined in the mITT population. Any participants who were lost to follow-up and not known to be alive or deceased by Day 28 were imputed as deceased.

  2. Clinical Response at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population

    Time frame: 7-14 days after end of therapy - TOC

    The clinical response in the ITT population at the TOC visit (derived from the Investigator's assessment at the EOT and TOC visits) was determined by the investigator to be either: clinical success, clinical failure, or indeterminate. Clinical success was declared when most or all clinical signs were completely resolved, with no new signs of infection, no additional antibiotic therapy was required, and the participant was alive. Indeterminate was declared when the investigator could not determine success or failure. Clinical failure was declared with progression, relapse, or recurrence of new symptoms of infection, or a persistence or insufficient improvement in signs and symptoms of VNP.

  3. Clinical Response at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Clinically-Evaluable (CE) Population

    Time frame: 7-14 days after end of therapy - TOC

    The clinical response in the CE population at the TOC visit (derived from the Investigator's assessment at the EOT and TOC visits) was determined by the investigator to be either: clinical success, clinical failure, or indeterminate. Clinical success was declared when most or all clinical signs were completely resolved, with no new signs of infection, no additional antibiotic therapy was required, and the participant was alive. Indeterminate was declared when the investigator could not determine success or failure. Clinical failure was declared with progression, relapse, or recurrence of new symptoms of infection, or a persistence or insufficient improvement in signs and symptoms of VNP.

  4. Number of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA)-Infected Participants With All-Cause Mortality in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

    The number of MSSA-infected participants with all-cause mortality within 28 days after randomization was determined in the mITT population. Participants who had confirmed MSSA culture results from respiratory tract or pleural fluid specimens obtained within 36 hours of study Day 1 were included. Any participants who were lost to follow-up and not known to be alive or deceased by Day 28 were imputed as deceased.

  5. Number of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)-Infected Participants With All-Cause Mortality in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

    The number of MRSA-infected participants with all-cause mortality within 28 days after randomization was determined in the mITT population. Participants who had confirmed MRSA culture results from respiratory tract or pleural fluid specimens obtained within 72 hours of study Day 1 were included. Any participants who were lost to follow-up and not known to be alive or deceased by Day 28 were imputed as deceased.

  6. Number of Participants With a Favorable Response at End-of-Therapy (EOT) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population

    Time frame: 1-3 days after completing study therapy (Days 8-10 or Days 15-17)

    The number of patients in the mITT population with a favorable response at EOT was determined. Favorable response included eradication (absence of the baseline pathogen) and presumed eradication (no source specimen to culture in a participant assessed as a clinical cure by the investigator).

  7. Number of Participants With a Favorable Response at End-of-Therapy (EOT) Visit in the Microbiologically-Evaluable 1 (ME-1) Population

    Time frame: 1-3 days after completing study therapy (Days 8-10 or Days 15-17)

    The number of patients in the ME-1 population with a favorable response at EOT was determined. Favorable response included eradication (absence of the baseline pathogen) and presumed eradication (no source specimen to culture in a participant assessed as a clinical cure by the investigator).

  8. Number of Participants With a Favorable Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population

    Time frame: 7-14 days after end of therapy - TOC

    The number of patients in the mITT population with a favorable response at TOC was determined. Favorable response included eradication (absence of the baseline pathogen) and presumed eradication (no source specimen to culture in a participant assessed as a clinical cure by the investigator).

  9. Number of Participants With a Favorable Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiologically-Evaluable 2 (ME-2) Population

    Time frame: 7-14 days after end of therapy - TOC

    The number of patients in the ME-2 population with a favorable response at TOC was determined. Favorable response included eradication (absence of the baseline pathogen) and presumed eradication (no source specimen to culture in a participant assessed as a clinical cure by the investigator).

  10. Number of Participants With ≥1 Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: Up to 32 days

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. Safety analysis is based on actual treatment received instead of randomization.

  11. Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Therapy Due to an Adverse Event (AE)

    Time frame: Up to 14 days

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. Safety analysis was based on actual treatment received and not randomization.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 3 Randomized Double-blind Study Comparing TR-701 FA and Linezolid in Ventilated Gram-positive Nosocomial Pneumonia

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Dec 24, 2013
Registry last updated
Jun 27, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.