Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01771029

Technical Evaluation of Brahms PCT Direct

Validation of the technical performance of the BRAHMS PTC direct point-of-care assay under routine conditions with native patient samples. The clinical validation is planned as a method comparison to a reference method (BRAHMS PCT sensitive KRYPTOR, Elecsys BRAHMS PCT). The study hypothesis is to show a highest correlation between the new product and the reference methods.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Pitié Salpetrière. Groupement hospitalière universitaire Est, Paris, France

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Procalcitonin (PCT) is a highly sensitive and specific marker which can be detected in the blood stream in response to a bacterial infection. In contrast to conventional infection disease markers PCT permits the differential diagnosis between bacterial and viral infections. The marker is implemented on Intensive Care Units (ICU) and Emergency Departments (ED) worldwide since 1996. Until now various technologies all basing on the use of serum or plasma samples are available in the market.

BRAHMS GmbH (Clinical Diagnostics Division of Thermo Fisher Scientific) as manufacturer of the Procalcitonin assays has developed a new quantitative immunochromatographic whole blood point-of-care assay, the BRAHMS PCT direct. The test follows the principle of a sandwich assay with two anti-PCT antibodies, one immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane and the tracer antibodies labeled with gold.

Validation of the technical performance of the product under routine conditions with native patient samples. The clinical validation is planned as a method comparison to a reference method (BRAHMS PCT sensitive KRYPTOR, Elecsys BRAHMS PCT). The internal pre-studies were performed with blood samples spiked with recombinant PCT and with native patient samples.

The primary objective of this study is to show a highest correlation between BRAHMS PCT direct with the PCT reference method for PCT- positive and negative samples.

The secondary object of this study is to show the advantage of BRAHMS PCT direct in time to result in comparison to the reference method.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years
  • possible infection at initial presentation
  • informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • none

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Correlation between BRAHMS PCT direct and reference method.

    Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

    Showing at least 90% correlation between BRAHMS PCT direct with the PCT reference method for PCT- positive and negative samples.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to result

    Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

    The secondary object of this study is to show the advantage of BRAHMS PCT direct in time to result in comparison to the reference method.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Philipp Schuetz

Other

Collaborators

  • Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc

Registry information

Official study title

Technical Evaluation of a Whole Blood Rapid Test Measuring Procalcitonin (BRAHMS PCT Direct)

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Jan 18, 2013
Registry last updated
Dec 12, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.