Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07715851

Survival, Success, Stability, and Patient Comfort of TADs Placed by Steady Oblique-Angled Versus Two-Step Angulation Insertion Techniques

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if two-step angulation Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) insertion technique better for survival, stability and patient-reported outcomes. It will also learn about how the trabecular bone volume fraction measured from pre-treatment CBCT imaging influences the stability, survival, and overall clinical success of TADs. The clinical trial will be carried out among fit and healthy adults aged 18 years old above who require extraction of all four permanent first premolars, planned for maximum anchorage using bilateral maxillary and mandibular TADs.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

In orthodontic patients,

* does the two-step angulation insertion technique for TADs provide superior survival, stability, and patient-reported outcomes, with acceptable complication rates? * how are these outcomes influenced by maxillary and mandibular trabecular bone volume fraction measured on CBCT?

Researchers will compare two-step angulation insertion technique to steady oblique-angled TADs insertion technique to see it provide more superior survival, stability, and patient-reported outcomes, with acceptable complication rates.

Participants will:

* be taken CBCT radiography before TADs insertion * receive both TADs insertion technique either right or left on both maxilla and mandible between second premolars and first molars * fill up patient reported outcome questionnaire At immediate post-insertion (T0), post alignment (T1), and subsequently at monthly intervals during en-masse retraction: 1 month (T2), 2 months (T3), 3 months (T4), 4 months (T5), 5 months (T6), 6 months (T7) * visit the clinic for measurement of TADs stability, clinical assessment of inflammation, mobility and the need for replacement at immediate post-insertion (T0), post alignment (T1), and subsequently at monthly intervals during en-masse retraction: 1 month (T2), 2 months (T3), 3 months (T4), 4 months (T5), 5 months (T6), 6 months (T7)

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya

Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia

Location contact

Maziahtul Zawani Munshi

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Saritha Sivarajan

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Siti Adibah Othman

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Wan Ying Lee

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wan Ying Lee, Master of Oral Science

CONTACT

[email protected]

014-8416384

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age range: 18 years old and above
  • Bimaxillary proclination with maximum anchorage control with TAD in maxilla and mandible
  • Extraction of all four permanent first premolar as part of orthodontic treatment
  • Crowding in the upper and lower incisors (< 5.0mm)
  • Overjet less than 6mm
  • BPE score 0, 1 or 2
  • Average vertical facial proportions

Exclusion criteria

  • Systemic diseases such as diabetes, osteoporosis
  • On long term use of antibiotics, phenytoin, cyclosporin, anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic corticosteroid and calcium channel blockers that would affect the bone biology
  • Cigarette smoking, vaping, history of smoking
  • Impacted / missing teeth at the treatment site
  • BPE score 3 and 4
  • Vertical skeletal discrepancies e.g. high angle and low angle.
  • Orthognathic treatment need
  • Craniofacial disorder, cleft lip and palate, syndromes
  • Low maxillary sinus level with alveolar crest height of less than 4mm
  • Titanium allergy
  • Pregnant woman

Treatment and study plan

Temporary Anchorage Device (TAD)

Device

The TAD (1.6 mm diameter X 6 mm length; J2, Dual-Top Anchor System, Jeil Medical, Seoul, Korea) will be inserted directly against cortical bone surface at 30-45° to the occlusal plane, targeted anatomically between second premolar and first permanent molar. The device will be manually driven into the alveolar bone using a manual torque driver calibrated to a 10 Ncm torque value

Two-step Angulation with Partial Unwinding Technique

Device
  • The TAD (1.6 mm diameter X 6 mm length; J2, Dual-Top Anchor System, Jeil Medical, Seoul, Korea) is initially placed against cortical bone surface parallel to the occlusal plane between second premolar and first permanent molar to create an initial osseous indentation.
  • A slitted rubber stopper will be used to mark the depth of the TAD tip penetration through the cortical bone, predetermined via CBCT assessment of local cortical bone thickness.
  • The TAD will undergo partial derotation (unwinding) by half the total number of initial insertion turns to slightly back the device away from the cortical bone.
  • The TADs will then be reangulated to an oblique path of 30-45° relative to the occlusal plane before completing final seating between second premolar and first permanent molar

Primary outcomes

  1. Survival rate

    Time frame: Post alignment (at the start of enmasse retraction), and subsequently at monthly intervals during en-masse retraction: Month 1, Month 2, Months 3, Month 4, Months 5, Months 6.

    Survival Rate Percentage of TADs that remain physically retained in bone (not necessarily stable for orthodontic load) over 6 months, regardless of whether they are functionally useful (Schätzle et al., 2009)

    Citeria of Survived TADs Retain in bone regardless function and complications.

    Mininum value:0% Maximum value: 100%

    Higher value indicate greater percentage of TADs that remain physically retained in bone (not necessarily stable for orthodontic load)

  2. Success rate

    Time frame: at immediate post-insertion (Day 0), post alignment (at the start of en-masse retraction), and subsequently at monthly intervals during en-masse retraction: Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 4, Month 5, and Month 6.

    Success Rate Percentage of TADs that remain functionally stable and serve their orthodontic purpose throughout treatment, without mobility, infection, or premature failure (Dalessandri et al., 2014)

    Citeria of Success TADs (Sharma et al., 2011)

    • No inflammation of soft tissue surrounding TADs
    • No clinically detectable mobility (IST > 60)
    • Anchorage function sustained until the end of the purpose for which the TADs were used

    Mininum value:0% Maximum value: 100% Higher value indicate higher percentage of TADs that remain functionally stable and serve their orthodontic purpose throughout treatment, without mobility, infection, or premature failure

  3. Primary stability and secondary stability

    Time frame: at immediate post-insertion (Day 0), post alignment (at the start of en-masse retraction), and subsequently at monthly intervals during en-masse retraction: Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 4, Month 5, and Month 6.

    Primary stability Mechanical retention of a TAD immediately after placement, derived from the mechanical interlocking between the screw threads and the surrounding bone (Seifi & Matini, 2016)

    Secondary stability Biological stabilisation of a TAD that occurs after healing and remodelling, primarily due to bone apposition and osseointegration around the device (Wu et al., 2021)

    AnyCheck Implant Stability Meter (Figure 3.8) to determine stability of TADs by measuring implant Stability Test (iST) value at insertion T0 to T9.

    Min value: 1 Max value: 99 Higher value indicate high stability of TADs

    Interpretation of iST (Kim et al., 2020) IST Range Interpretation <60 Low primary stability 60-64 Moderate stability >64 High stability

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient- reported outcome

    Time frame: at immediate post-insertion (Day 0), post alignment (at the start of en-masse retraction), and subsequently at monthly intervals during en-masse retraction: Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 4, Month 5, and Month 6.

    Patient perception of pain at each quadrant (upper right, upper left, lower right, and lower left jaw) will be measured with a four-point Likert scale correlated with a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

    Perceptions of swelling, chewing difficulty, and cleaning difficulty at each jaw quadrant will be captured using categorical dichotomous responses (Yes or No).

    Patient reported outcome questionnaires (Appendix 2):

    Patient perception of pain 0: No pain/VAS 0)

    • Mild pain/VAS 1-4
    • Moderate pain/VAS 5-6
    • Severe or worsening pain/VAS 7-10 Perceptions of swelling, chewing difficulty, and cleaning difficulty Yes: Presence of swelling/ chewing difficulty/ cleaning difficulty No: Absence of swelling/ chewing difficulty/ cleaning difficulty
  2. Trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV)

    Time frame: During enmasse retraction at Month 6

    Percentage of the volume of mineralized trabecular bone (bone volume, BV) to the total volume (TV) of the region of interest within cancellous bone. Association between maxillary and mandibular trabeculae bone volume fraction with TADs stability, survival and success

    White region: (Bruker, 2013) Solid regions of the bony trabeculae areas within the range of the binary threshold selection

    Black region:

    Spaces among the bong mandibular trabeculae

    Min value: 1% Max value: 99% Higher value indicate higher percentage of the volume of mineralized trabecular bone (bone volume, BV) to the total volume (TV) of the region of interest within cancellous bone. ercentage of the volume of mineralized trabecular bone (bone volume, BV) to the total volume (TV) of the region of interest within cancellous bone.

  3. Complications (inflammation, mobility, or need for replacement)

    Time frame: at immediate post-insertion (Day 0), post alignment (at the start of en-masse retraction), and subsequently at monthly intervals during en-masse retraction: Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 4, Month 5, and Month 6.

    • Inflammation Redness, swelling or bleeding on touching around the neck of the TADs (Park et al., 2006; Samrit et al., 2012) Inflammation (Park et al., 2006; Samrit et al., 2012) Yes: Presence of redness, swelling or bleeding on touching around the neck of the TADs No: Absence of redness, swelling or bleeding on touching around the neck of the TADs
    • Mobility Mobility will be checked with AnyCheck implant stability meter. Mobility (Kim et al., 2020) Yes: Mobile (IST < 60) No: Not mobile (IST > 60)
    • Need for replacement of TADs Removal and reinsertion of a TADs at a new or the same site due to loss of stability, inflammation, root contact, soft-tissue complications, or poor anchorage performance during orthodontic treatment.

    Need for replacement Yes: Need replacement of TADs (IST < 60) No: No need replacement of TADs (IST > 60)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Wan Ying Lee, Master of Oral Science

CONTACT

[email protected]

014-8416384

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Malaya

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Survival, Success, Stability, and Patient Comfort of Temporary Anchorage Devices Placed by Steady Oblique-Angled Versus Two-Step Angulation Insertion Techniques: A Split-Mouth Randomised Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jul 21, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 21, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.