Stephen Price
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT04007185
This study provides a work package for a larger programme of research developing Precision Surgery for Glioblastomas by developing individualised treatment volumes for surgery and radiotherapy. This study will recruit a cohort of patients with tumours in different brain regions and involve imaging pre- and post-operatively to outline the area of 'injury' to normal brain. The investigators will then correlate anatomical disruption with changes in measures of quality of life, visual functioning and visual fields and neuropsychology.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
16 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
This study aims to explore the effect of surgically induced visual and neuro-cognitive defects on patient functioning and quality of life. The aims of this study are:
Patient Assessment: Patients will be assessed using the following tools.
Timings of assessments will be:
Analysis of Clinical Data:
Visual deterioration will be defined as either deterioration in visual acuity (reduction in LogMAR >0.2), or an increase in visual field loss. Deterioration in the NEI-VFQ25 will be determined by published minimal important clinical differences.
Cognitive deterioration: significant abnormalities in cognition are defined as >2 standard deviations from established data from normal patients.
Changes in quality of life: as the investigators expect undergoing surgery alone may be associated with deterioration in quality of life, using published, minimally important clinical differences may not be valid. Instead the investigators will use the reliable change index (RCI) - this this is an individual's score computed as the difference in the baseline and delayed assessment tests divided by the standard error of the difference of the test calculated from a cohort of patients who have undergone an image-guided biopsy (i.e. underwent surgery under anaesthesia with minimal brain disruption) as control subjects.
MR Image Analysis:
Objectives and key deliverables: The primary objective will be to assess impact of developing a new, permanent surgically-induced visual or cognitive lesion has on quality of life. This will be achieved by understanding the effect of surgically induced visual/cognitive defects on quality of life. This will be achieved by comparing quality of life and NEI-VFQ25 scores for patients with and without newly developed surgically induced deficits.
Secondary objectives will include:
The investigators will use the data to explore the impact on surgery and changes in cognition and quality of life with disruption of functional brain networks as an exploratory outcome.
Patient Numbers: By recruiting 21 patients with visual deficits and comparing their mean RCI values with 21 patients without such deficits (as controls), an effect size of 0.8 (large) can be detected with 80% probability in a one-sided test (5% type I error rate). An effect size of 0.6 would be detected with a 60% probability under the same conditions with that sample size. From our pilot study data the investigators assume a 25% rate of visual deficit, and therefore 84 patients need to be recruited as a minimum to achieve the required sample size per group. A further 21 patients with frontal lobe lesions will be recruited to look for cognitive decline, and then (generously) assume a 15% drop out figure, so that the total patient numbers will be 120 for this work-package.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Such clinical problems include, but are not limited to:
Standard surgical resection as part of routine care
Time frame: 5 +/- 1 weeks post surgery (delayed assessment as defined above)
Comparison of quality of life measures (using EORTC QLQ30 with BN20 module scores) for patients with and without newly developed surgically induced deficits. These are standard tools for assessing patient reported quality of life
Time frame: Within 72 hours of surgery (early assessment as defined above)
Anatomical disruption will be achieved by:
Time frame: 5 +/- 1 weeks post surgery (delayed assessment as defined above)
Investigate recovery of surgically-induced visual deficits by comparing visual function between early assessment and delayed assessment (before starting radiotherapy). Definitions of visual deficits have been clearly defined in the protocol. To confirm they are - Visual deterioration will be defined as either deterioration in visual acuity (reduction in LogMAR >0.2), or an increase in visual field loss. Deterioration in the NEI-VFQ25 will be determined by published minimal important clinical differences.
Time frame: Within 72 hours of surgery (early assessment as defined above)
Investigate recovery of surgically-induced cognitive deficits (measured using the OCS-Bridge tool) by comparing cognitive function between early assessment and delayed assessment. Definitions of cognitive deficits are defined as >2 standard deviations from established data from normal patients.
Time frame: 5 +/- 1 weeks post surgery (delayed assessment as defined above)
Quantifying white matter tract disruption by correlating DTI metrics with development of new visual deficits. This will be made by comparing visual field deficits (defined as the angle of field loss at delayed assessment compared to baseline) with extent of white matter disruption on DTI (defined from changes in DTI from baseline to early assessment).
Time frame: Developing a deficit/not developing deficit will be classified at 6 weeks of surgery (pre-RT). Overall survival figures will be followed until the death of the patient or six months from the last patient undergoing their post-RT assessment.
Explore impact of new visual and cognitive deficit has on overall survival (defined as date of death from any cause, measured in weeks, assessed up to 3 years post-operatively), compared to patients that don't develop these deficits
Time frame: 5 +/- 1 weeks post surgery (delayed assessment as defined above)
Patients will be divided at baseline into three categories of cognitive reserve using the CRq questionnaire that estimates high, medium and low cognitive reserve. We will correlate these categories with changes in cognitive assessments using the OCS-Bridge tool.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Other
Assessing Impact of Surgically-induced Deficits on Patient Functioning and Quality of Life (SIND Study)
Acronym: SIND
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02152982
Astrocytoma, Glioblastoma
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05781321
Astrocytoma, Glioblastoma
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04555577
Astrocytoma, Glioblastoma
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03297125
Astrocytoma, Glioblastoma
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial Details