laboratory biomarker analysis
OtherCorrelative studies
NCT Number: NCT02152982
This randomized phase II/III trial studies how well temozolomide and veliparib work compared to temozolomide alone in treating patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Veliparib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether temozolomide is more effective with or without veliparib in treating glioblastoma multiforme.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Fundacion De Investigacion de Diego, San Juan, Puerto Rico
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. Test whether the experimental combination of ABT-888 (veliparib) combined with TMZ (temozolomide), compared to the control of placebo combined with TMZ, significantly extends overall survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients with tumor MGMT promoter hypermethylation.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Test whether the experimental treatment significantly extends progression-free survival.
II. Test whether the experimental treatment improves objective tumor response. III. Test whether the experimental treatment is associated with significantly greater rates of grade 3 or higher adverse events.
CORRELATIVE SCIENCE OBJECTIVES:
I. Evaluate the utility of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in defining time to progression in the setting of a large multi-institutional clinical trial.
II. Test the concordance between site-determined MGMT methylation status and central laboratory determination of MGMT status in cases with local testing.
III. Evaluate whether genetic or epigenetic alterations in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair or replication genes are associated with overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective tumor response.
IV. Test whether polymorphisms in MGMT, PARP1, or other DNA repair proteins, are associated with overall survival, progression-free survival, objective tumor response, or rates of grade 3 or higher adverse events.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients receive temozolomide orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-5 and placebo PO twice daily (BID) on days 1-7. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression (confirmed progression) or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM II: Patients receive temozolomide as in Arm I and veliparib PO BID on days 1-7. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression (confirmed progression) or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 3 years, every 6 months for 2 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Correlative studies
Given PO
Ancillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Given PO
Other names: CCRG-81045, Gliotem, Imidazo[5,1-d]-1,2,3,5-tetrazine-8-carboxamide, 3, 4-dihydro-3-methyl-4-oxo-, M & B 39831, M and B 39831, Methazolastone, RP-46161, SCH 52365, Temcad, Temizole, Temodal, Temodar, Temomedac, TMZ
Given PO
Other names: ABT 888, ABT-888, ABT888, PARP-1 inhibitor ABT-888
Time frame: 83 months
The distribution of OS for each arm will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with a stratified logrank test.
Time frame: 10 years
Cox proportional hazards model will be used to evaluate whether there is a potential interaction between the treatment arm and the Optune device. If an interaction is detected, separate analyses of treatment effect (using Cox models) will be done for patients treated with the Optune device and patients who were not treated with the Optune device.
Time frame: 120 months
The distribution of PFS for each arm will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and be compared using Cox proportional hazard models with all stratification factors adjusted. Progression (PD): Defined by any of the following:
Time frame: 5 years
Defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as specified in the Revised Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. An objective tumor response will be evaluated for each patient and the tumor response count will be summarized for each arm and compared using the Chi-square test. For CR, all of the following must be true:
disappearance of all enhancing measurable and non-measurable disease; no new enhancing lesions; stable or improved non-enhancing lesions; patients must be off corticosteroids; stable or improved clinically A PR requires all of the following: > 50% decrease in sum of products of perpendicular diameters of all measurable enhancing lesions compared with baseline; no progression of non-measurable disease; no new lesions; stable or improved non-enhancing lesions on same or lower dose of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan; steroid dose should be same or lower compared with baseline scan; stable or improved clinically
Time frame: 5 years
Assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (version 5 beginning April 1, 2018). The overall adverse event rates for grade 3 or higher adverse events will be summarized and be compared using Chi-Square or Fisher's Exact tests between treatment arms. The maximum grade for each type of treatment-related adverse event will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables for each arm will be reviewed to determine patterns. Treatment-related adverse events will be tabulated for each arm.
Time frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
Measured by the fatigue/uniscale tool. The fatigue/uniscale tool will be used as a measure of QOL. Potential differences in fatigue levels of patients treated on the two different arms will be evaluated. Changes in this measure will be evaluated over the course of treatment for both arms and will be compared using a two-sample t-test at each timepoint. Will also compute a normalized area under the curve (AUC) for the values of each patient over time and compare the mean AUCs for patients on the two arms.
Time frame: Baseline
The concordance between site-determined MGMT methylation status and central laboratory determination of MGMT status will be analyzed using the Chi-Square test of proportions and 95% confidence intervals for the proportion of tests in disagreement with the local site.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nih
A Phase II/III Randomized Trial of Veliparib or Placebo in Combination With Adjuvant Temozolomide in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma With MGMT Promoter Hypermethylation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04555577
Astrocytoma, Glioblastoma
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05095376
Astrocytoma, Glioblastoma
Fairbanks, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04528680
Astrocytoma, GBM
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02455557
Astrocytoma, Glioblastoma
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details