NCT Number: NCT02528266
Surgical Treatment of Symptomatic Neuroma "Stop Neuroma"
This study is conducted to clinically assess safety and performance of the Polyganics nerve capping device for the treatment of symptomatic neuroma. There is sufficient clinical experience with regard to the safety of the commercially available nerve guide, NEUROLAC®. This new nerve capping device is identical in material and manufacturing. The exception is in design, where NEUROLAC® has two open ends, the nerve capping device has one closed (sealed) end. This study will be conducted to obtain data on the clinical performance of the capping device's ability to isolate the nerve end, resulting in a reduction of pain of experienced from the symptomatic neuroma and prevention of the reoccurrence of a symptomatic neuroma.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
Strasbourg University Hospitals, Strasbourg, France
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Subjects will be eligible according to the following criteria:
- Subjects who are able to provide a written informed consent prior to participating in the clinical investigation.
- Subjects who are > 18 years year old.
- Subjects with a diagnosis of symptomatic primary or secondary end-neuroma.
- Symptomatic neuroma located on the upper limb between the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints to shoulder.
- Symptomatic neuroma confirmed by pain relief following a 10min ±2min nerve block with Xylocaine (Lidocaine) - Pain relief defined as any reduction in VAS questionnaire score.
- Subjects with history of pain in the area of the end-neuroma for at least 6-months.
- Subjects with a positive Tinel's sign.
Exclusion criteria
Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation:
- Inability to comply with the clinical investigation follow-up or other clinical investigation requirements.
- Subjects who are pregnant or intend to become pregnant during the duration of the clinical investigation or subjects who are not using appropriate birth control.
- Subjects who have had historical radiotherapy in the area of the end-neuroma.
- Symptomatic neuroma located proximally from the shoulder or distally from MCP joints.
- Subjects not willing to follow post-surgery protocols (e.g. avoiding pressure on the implant zone).
- Subjects is involved in another pain study.
- Subjects who have a known allergy to anesthetic agent or bioresorbable copolyester Poly(68/32[15/85 D/L] Lactide-Ԑ-Caprolactone) (PLCL).
- Subjects with a symptomatic neuroma that underwent surgical treatment for pain management on two or more occasions.
- Insufficient soft tissue at the end-neuroma site to cover the investigational device.
- Immunosuppressed patients, or patients with planned immunosuppressive therapy within 12-month following the study procedure.
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
Safety data (Serious adverse events )
Time frame: 6 weeks
Serious adverse events related to the investigation device as determine by independent expert.
-
Effectiveness (VAS score)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: VAS score (0-100 / no pain - unbearable pain) at 6-week follow-up compared to score at baseline.
-
Effectiveness (QuickDASH score)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: QuickDASH score (30 items scored 1-5) at 6-week follow-up compared to score at baseline.
-
Effectiveness (Quantity and class of pain medication used)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Quantity and class of pain medication used for the end-neuroma pain at 6-week follow-up compared to baseline
Secondary outcomes
-
Safety (Rate of serious adverse device effects)
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Rate of serious adverse device effects as determined by the physician and independent expert.
- Reduction of pain caused by symptomatic neuroma after 3 months, 6 months and 12 months following the procedure, as compared to pain before the procedure.
- Improvement of quality of life at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months follow-up, as compared to the quality of life before the procedure.
- ≤20% recurrence of symptomatic neuroma within 12 months.
- Reduction of pain medication used to treat neuroma pain at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months, as compared to the quantity pain medication used for the neuroma pain before the procedure.
-
Effectiveness (VAS score)
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: VAS score (0-100 / no pain - unbearable pain) compared to score at baseline.
-
Effectiveness (QuickDASH score)
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: QuickDASH score (30 items scored 1-5) compared to score at baseline.
-
Effectiveness (DN4 score)
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 months
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: DN4 score (10 y/n items characterising pain) compared to score at baseline.
-
Effectiveness (Elliot score)
Time frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 months
Pain caused by symptomatic end-neuroma: Elliot score (5 items rated 0 (no pain) to 4 (pain intolerable)) compared to score at baseline.
-
Effectiveness (Quantity and class of pain medication used)
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
Quantity and class of pain medication used for the neuroma pain at 3, 6 and 12 months
-
Rate of recurrence of symptomatic neuroma
Time frame: 12 months
defined as daily pain combined with increased used of pain medication compared to baseline and no improvement in QuickDASH score, but pain is relieved with Xylocaine nerve block.
Other outcomes
-
Usability (User Device Handling Questionnaire)
Time frame: Day 0
Ease of placement of the device assessed via User Device Handling Questionnaire.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Polyganics BV
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
Open Non-randomized Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Nerve Capping Device to Prevent Neuroma Formation After Traumatic Nerve Section
Important dates
- Study start
- 2016
- Primary completion
- 2018
- Study completion
- 2018
- First posted
- Aug 19, 2015
- Registry last updated
- Jun 13, 2018
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
High-Purity Type I Collagen Nerve Wrapping in Peripheral Nerve Procedures: A Prospective Registry
NCT07360730
Neoplasms, Neoplasms by Histologic Type
Mandya, Karnataka, India
View Trial DetailsTargeted Muscle Reinnervation in the Hand for the Managment of Symptomatic Neuroma Following Digit and Hand Amputations
NCT06923566
Digital Amputation, Neoplasms
Al ‘Abbāsīyah, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsA Post Market Clinical Follow-up Study on Biomet Microfixation HTR PEKK (Midface), Facial & Mandibular Plates.
NCT04931056
Acrofacial dysostosis, Nager type, Bone Diseases
Salta, Argentina
View Trial DetailsPostoperative Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Management of Post-amputation Pain
NCT03484429
Acute Pain, Amputation
Richmond, Virginia, United States
View Trial Details