Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23249, United States
NCT Number: NCT03484429
Limb loss is frequently associated with postamputation pain that can be challenging to treat and often involves opioids. Advances in the field of neuromodulation has led to development of an intentionally reversible percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) system that has had promising results when treating chronic postamputation pain. PNS may offer sustained pain relief even after the treatment period has ended. Currently, there is no convincing evidence regarding the role of PNS in the acute postoperative period, which may be a critical time to control pain as those with higher pain appear to be at higher risk for developing persistent post-procedural pain. The investigators of this study aim to evaluate the feasibility and effects of PNS in the acute postoperative period and determine the feasibility of completing a randomized controlled treatment outcome study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Richmond, Virginia, 23249, United States
16 patients with new nontraumatic transfemoral or transtibial amputation will be enrolled in the study
Having met inclusion criteria, the patients will be randomized to experimental or control groups
Patients in the experimental group undergo placement of PNS leads within 7 days of amputation surgery
Patients in both groups will be treated with standard pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic pain therapies and evaluated weekly for 8 weeks, then at 3, 6, and 12 months postamputation
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Up to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation
Medications, physical therapy, or other pain treatments
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3.
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, 5-8, and Month 3
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0"=no pain to "10"=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time frame: Preop, Hospital Discharge, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, Week 12
The number of subjects prescribed any opioid medication and any dose. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time frame: Preoperative, Hospital discharge, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Week 12
Opioid consumption (daily OME) over time was collected for all subjects.
Time frame: Preoperative, Week 4, and Week 8
FIM mobility subscores were recorded by a physical therapist to measure the ability to walk, use a wheelchair, transfer to tub/shower, transfer to toilet, and mobility in bed, chair, and wheelchair. Scores range from "1" = subject requires total assistance for the task to "7" = complete independence. A higher score is better.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate how much pain has interfered with daily activities over the past 24 hours on a scale of "0" = no interference to "10" = completely interferes with activities. A lower score is better.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Self-report measure PGIC reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment. PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change as
1 = "very much improved," 2 = "much improved," 3 = "minimally improved," 4 = "no change," 5 = "minimally worse," 6 = "much worse," or 7 = "very much worse." A lower score is better.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Pain catastrophizing is the tendency to magnify the threat value of a pain stimulus and to feel helpless in the presence of pain. This is further characterized by the inability to prevent or inhibit pain-related thoughts surrounding a painful event. Pain catastrophizing affects how individuals experience pain. The PCS is a 13-item inventory of statements in which the subject is asked to rate the degree to which they agree, on a scale of "0" = not at all to "4" = all the time. The responses for each item are added for a total PCS score (range 0-52). A lower score is better.
Time frame: Weeks 4, Week 8, and Week 12
The PDI is designed to measure the degree to which aspects of life are disrupted by chronic pain. The impact of pain on various aspects of life (e.g. family/home responsibilities, recreation, social activity, occupation, sexual behavior, self-care, and life-support activities) are recorded on a 10-point scale from "0" = no disability to "10" = worst disability. The sum of scores is recorded for a total PDI score (range 0-70). A lower score is better.
Time frame: 30 days from hospital discharge
Percent of Group that was readmitted to the hospital within 30 days following hospital discharge.
Time frame: Number of days from surgery to discharge
Hospital LOS was calculated from day of surgery to day of discharge from inpatient hospital ward to rehabilitation facility.
Hunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical Center
Fed
Effects of Postoperative Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Acute and Chronic Amputation Pain
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04060875
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01608035
Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Pain
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT03029884
Central Nervous System Diseases, Chronic Pain
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07432685
Chronic Pain, Chronic Pain Due to Injury
Lviv, Ukraine
View Trial Details