Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03709537

Supporting the Mental Health Workforce

Emotional Health Association will engage Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health providers that employ peer workers in a training and technical assistance intervention designed to support, increase, and retain an effective peer workforce. This intervention consists of a Co-Learning Collaborative, several training sessions, and the creation of Implementation Teams. Peer workers will also be encouraged to attend Recovery International, an established network of self-help support groups for mental health. Dr. Louis Brown will lead an evaluation of the efficacy of the intervention. This study will inform the use of peer workers as a component of the mental health workforce.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Mental Health Behavior Personal Satisfaction Psychological Well-Being

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

SHARE! Self-Help and Recovery Exchance

Culver City, California, 90230, United States

About this study

Evaluation of the the intervention with the peer workforce will be conducted through administration of web-based surveys of peer workers and peer supervisors at baseline and follow-up (10 months post-baseline). These two surveys will be administered to peer workers and peer supervisors at sites enrolled in the study. A letter of informational detailing the risks of participation will accompany the survey. Individuals who do not complete the web-based survey will be invited to complete a telephone interview with the same questions. Sites (where one or more peer supervisors and peer workers are located) will be randomized to either the intervention group or standard practice control group. The intervention group will engage in Co-Learning Collaborative, several training sessions, and the creation of Implementation Teams. Peer workers from the intervention group will also be encouraged to attend Recovery International, an established network of self-help support groups for mental health. Analysis of the surveys collected from both study groups will be conducted to assess the efficacy of the intervention and provide Emotional Health Association with a final report.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All service providing sites within the Los Angeles Department of Mental Health will be invited to participate in the study. Sites not affiliated with the Los Angeles Department of Mental Health will be allowed to enroll in the study if they express interest but will not be actively recruited.
  • Participants must be a peer worker or supervisor of peer workers at a site participating in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Peers who do not receive pay and volunteer for less that 15 hours per week.

Treatment and study plan

Mental Health Peer Workforce Support

Behavioral

Supervisors and peer workers will participate in trainings covering effective peer services, trauma-informed effective peer supervision, and responsibilities of peer workers in a supervising relationship. A monthly Supervisors of Peer Workers meeting will support site change efforts. Sites will create an implementation team to work within their site to implement the training received.

Peer Workers will enroll in a peer mentoring program, where they serve as peer mentors matched with fellow peer mentors. Recovery International and the Los Angeles Department of Mental Health will encourage peer workers to attend Recovery International meetings. Emotional Health Association will refer Peer Workers and their Supervisors in the intervention group to self-help support groups that reduce stress and increase resiliency.

Primary outcomes

  1. Peer-supportive organizational climate

    Time frame: 10 months

    Peer-supportive organizational climate will be assessed by a set of 6 likert-scale questions that asks about the participant about his/her organization's administrative leadership and the support they provide.

    1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about organization) 7= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about organization)

  2. Mental Health Stigma

    Time frame: 10 months

    This outcome will be assessed by asking the peer supervisor a set of 15 likert-scale questions about their feelings towards individuals with mental health issues.

    1= Strongly Disagree 5= Strongly Agree

  3. Peer Worker Recovery

    Time frame: 10 months

    This outcome will be assessed by a set of 24 likert scale questions that ask the participants how they feel about themselves and their lives.

    1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about self) 5= Strongly Agree (with positive statement about self)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recovery orientation of services

    Time frame: 10 Months

    This outcome will be measured with 4 questions that ask the peer workers to rate their level of agreement with statements about their organization's treatment of service users (or clients)

    1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about services) 7= Strongly Agree (with positive statement about services)

  2. Supervisor's peer support attitudes

    Time frame: 10 Months

    This outcome will be assessed by asking the peer supervisor a set of three likert-scale questions about the importance of peer support for mental health services.

    1=Not important at all 10 =Extremely Important

  3. Supervisor's job satisfaction

    Time frame: 10 Months

    This outcome will be measured using one likert-scale question that asks how satisfied the supervisors are with their job- from 1 (highly unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied).

  4. Supervision quality (as rated by peer workers)

    Time frame: 10 Months

    This outcome will be assessed with a set of 7 likert scale questions that ask about the peer worker's experience with their supervisor.

    1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about supervisor) 7= Strongly Agree (with positive statement about supervisor)

  5. Peer worker time spent on peer support activities

    Time frame: 10 Months

    This outcome will be measured by asking the peer workers to rate how much time they spend on 9 different support activities on a typical week-- from "None" to "40 hours plus".

  6. Peer worker discrimination experience

    Time frame: 10 Months

    This will be measured with a set of 5 likert scale questions that asks the peer worker about their experience with discrimination due to their mental health.

    1= Strongly Disagree (with statement about negative experience) 5= Strongly Agree (with statement about negative experience)

  7. Supervisor/peer worker relationship (as rated by supervisor)

    Time frame: 10 Months

    This outcome will be measured by a set of 12 likert scale questions from the Supervisory Relationship Measure developed by Pearce et al. 2012.

    1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about peer worker) 5= Strongly Agree (with positive statement about peer worker)

  8. Peer worker contributions (as rated by supervisor)

    Time frame: 10 Months

    This outcome will be measured by a set of 12 likert scale questions.

    1= Strongly Disagree 7= Strongly Agree

  9. Peer worker job satisfaction

    Time frame: 10 Months

    This outcome will be measured using one likert-scale question that asks how satisfied the peer workers are with their job- from 1 ("highly unsatisfied") to 5 ("very satisfied").

  10. Peer worker sick leave and disability days

    Time frame: 10 Months

    This outcome will be measured with the following question from the Stapelfeldt et al 2012 instrument:

    "How many sick leave or disability days has _____ had within the last 6 months?"

  11. Peer worker work-related burnout

    Time frame: 10 Months

    This will assesses with a set of 7 likert scale questions that ask the peer worker for the frequency of certain experiences at their job.

    1= Always 5= Never/Almost Never

  12. Peer worker mental health problems

    Time frame: 10 Months

    This outcome will be assessed by a set of 27 likert-scale questions that asks the participant how frequent they have experienced feelings of distress in the past 30 days.

    1= Not all (pertaining to negative statement) 5= Extremely (pertaining to negative statement)

  13. Peer worker social support

    Time frame: 10 Months

    This outcome will be assessed by having the peer workers answer some questions about the people in their environment who provide them with help or support.

    1= Very satisfied (with specific person's support) 6= Very dissatisfied (with specific person's support)

  14. Peer worker stress

    Time frame: 10 Months

    This outcome will be measured by a set of 6 likert scale questions that ask the peer worker to rate the frequency that they have had stressful experiences in the past 30 days.

    1= Never (pertaining to negative statement) 5= Very Often (pertaining to negative statement)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Other

Collaborators

  • California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development
  • Emotional Health Association

Registry information

Official study title

Local Organizational Support and Development Networks for Public Mental Health System Workforce With Lived Experience

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Oct 17, 2018
Registry last updated
Apr 10, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.