Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06360328

Success Rates of Video- vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation in Anesthesiology Residents: A Randomized Controlled Trial" (The JuniorDoc-VL-Trial)

Securing the airway through endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a fundamental skill for anaesthetists. It is used during surgery, in the intensive care unit, during periprocedural anaesthesia and in emergency medicine. The clinical relevance of airway management is demonstrated in particular by the fact that the main cause of serious anaesthesia-related complications lies in the area of airway management. increasing technological developments in recent years (e.g. video laryngoscopy [VL]) aim to reduce the complication rate in the area of airway management. however, there are currently a large number of VLs available, which differ massively in their application. Therefore, it is essential to systematically collect data and develop structured training in airway management, taking into account current technological developments.While endotracheal intubation is traditionally performed with a direct laryngoscope, indirect video laryngoscopy, with chip-based camera technology at its tip, has been introduced across the board in recent years and is now part of standard clinical and preclinical equipment. Doctors in advanced training are trained with a focus on direct laryngoscopy; the use of and training in indirect video laryngoscopy does not follow any standards; in addition, the decision as to which method of securing the airway is chosen has so far been the responsibility of the individual doctor in anaesthesiology, although there is a tendency for the VL to be associated with a higher success rate in the first intubation attempt, the so-called "first-pass success".The main aim of this clinical prospective, randomised controlled trial is to train anaesthetists in advanced training in conventional direct laryngoscopy on the one hand and indirect video laryngoscopy (VL) on the other, with a focus on tracking the progress of their skills after 200 intubations with regard to first-pass success.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Securing the airway is a core competence of anaesthetists, intensive care physicians and emergency physicians, as oxygenation of the human organism is not possible without an open or secured airway. The introduction of new techniques and the implementation of guidelines and strategies for the care of the difficult airway have contributed significantly to a reduction in morbidity and mortality. Of particular importance are problems that can occur during airway management, which are referred to in anaesthesiology as the "difficult airway". The term "difficult airway" refers to problems that can occur during airway management. Despite technological advances in the field of airway management, such as the use of video laryngoscopes, the definition of a difficult airway is still based on the traditional methods of mask ventilation and intubation using direct laryngoscopy. In recent years, several airway management studies suggest that the primary use of video laryngoscopes in adult patients undergoing endotracheal intubation is associated with a reduction in failed attempts and complications such as hypoxaemia.Problems during endotracheal intubation are often subsumed under the term "difficult intubation" without differentiating between "laryngoscopy" and "endotracheal intubation". However, if indirect laryngoscopy techniques are used, such as videolaryngoscopic intubation, a clear distinction must be made between the two procedures, as the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy is always lower than that of difficult or impossible intubation. The incidence of difficult direct laryngoscopy is 1.5% to 8.0%, while the incidence of difficult intubation is slightly lower. A potentially life threatening unexpected "cannot intubate, cannot ventilate" situation has a probability of0.008% (1:13,000) to 0.004% (1:25,000). In a randomised study design, we would like to record resident anaesthesiologists (first-year) learning the skill of endotracheal intubation with direct and indirect laryngoscopy in order to derive and analyse anaesthesiological quality parameters, such as first-pass success and possible complications. The individual learning curves of those entering the profession will also be taken into account in order to gain insights for the improvement of training programmes and training methods in anaesthesiology.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • First Year Anesthesiology Residents

Exclusion criteria

  • Physicians' refusal to participate in the study
  • Participants in another study

Treatment and study plan

Video Laryngoscopy

Device

The residents used video laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt (First-Pass-Success).

    Time frame: Directly during intubation

    Rate of Successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt (First-Pass-Success).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of complications such as desaturation below 90% Oxygen saturation level (SpO2), regurgitation, dental or soft tissue trauma.

    Time frame: Directly during intubation

    Number of complications such as desaturation below 90% Oxygen saturation level (SpO2), regurgitation, dental or soft tissue trauma.

  2. Specify the number of attempts made during laryngoscopy.

    Time frame: Directly during intubation

    Specify the number of attempts made during laryngoscopy.

  3. Compare the level of training with intubation success.

    Time frame: During the analysis

    Compare the level of training with intubation success.

  4. Mention any failures or transitions to other rescue techniques.

    Time frame: Directly during intubation

    Mention any failures or transitions to other rescue techniques.

  5. Specify the use of Optimal External Laryngeal Manipulation (OELM) techniques such as backward, upward and rightward pressure (BURP) Cricoid Pressure (CP) or adjustment of the participant's head and neck position.

    Time frame: Directly during intubation

    Specify the use of Optimal External Laryngeal Manipulation (OELM) techniques such as backward, upward and rightward pressure (BURP) Cricoid Pressure (CP) or adjustment of the participant's head and neck position.

  6. When using VL, record the occurrence of fogging.

    Time frame: Directly during intubation

    When using VL, record the occurrence of fogging.

  7. Assess the glottic view using the Cormack-Lehane-Score (I - IV). (I = good view)

    Time frame: Directly during intubation

    Assess the glottic view using the Cormack-Lehane-Score (I - IV).(I = good view)

  8. assess the glottic view using the Percentage of Glottic Opening Score (POGO) (0%-100%). (0%= no view, 100% best view)

    Time frame: Directly during intubation

    assess the glottic view using the Percentage of Glottic Opening Score (POGO) (0%-100%)(0%= no view, 100% best view)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Davut Deniz Uzun, Dr. / MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

004962215639349

Felix Schmitt, Ass. Prof.

CONTACT

[email protected]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Heidelberg

Other

Registry information

Acronym: JuniorDoc-VL

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Apr 11, 2024
Registry last updated
Jan 22, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.