Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03592498

Study to Evaluate the Use of Tilapia Skin (Oreochromis Niloticus), in the Treatment of Burn Wounds

Randomised Clinical Study to evaluate the efficacy of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) skin as an occlusive biological dressing, in the treatment of humans burn wounds.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–50 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

About this study

This was a randomized, monocentric; open-label pilot clinical study conducted at the Dr. José Frota Institute's Burn Treatment Center, located in Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, from October 2016 to September 2017.

The study participants were recruited from the population of patients attending the Burning Treatment Center of the Dr. José Frota Institute. Were included female and male participants, age range greater than or equal to 18 and greater than or equal to 50 years old and who met the following criteria: presence of a dermatological wound caused by superficial second-degree burn with up to 20% of the body surface or deep second degree with area of 5 to 15% of the body surface; absence of previous treatment for the current burn and without other significant diseases that could impact their participation in the study. No study participants were known to have hypersensitivity to materials used in the study or to related compounds; history of serious adverse reactions; addiction to drugs, including alcohol; pregnancy and labor or miscarriage in the 12 weeks prior to the scheduled start of treatment.

The study was divided according to the depth and burned body surface area of the research participant:

Study A: Burning of 2nd Surface Degree with <10% of body surface area - Patients in outpatient care, within this group, the research participants were randomly assigned to the following treatment groups: active comparator (sulfadiazine, Silver) or experimental (skin of Nile tilapia).

Study B: 2nd Degree Burn with 10 to 20% body surface area - Inpatient, within this group, the research participants were randomly assigned to the following treatment groups: active comparator (sulfadiazine, Silver) or experimental (skin of Nile tilapia).

Study C: Deep 2nd Degree Burn with 5 to 15% body surface area - Inpatient, within this group, the research participants were randomly assigned to the following treatment groups: active comparator (sulfadiazine, Silver) or experimental (skin of Nile tilapia).

Interventions:

Participants were randomly assigned to the following treatments:

  • Experimental intervention: use of the skin of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), as a biological occlusive dressing;
  • Active comparator intervention: Conventional treatment with silver sulfadiazine.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of a dermatological wound caused by superficial second-degree burn with up to 20% of the body surface or deep second degree with area of 5 to 15% of the body surface;
  • Absence of previous treatment for the current burn
  • Without other significant diseases that could impact their participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Hypersensitivity to materials used in the study or to related compounds;
  • History of serious adverse reactions;
  • Addiction to drugs, including alcohol;
  • Pregnancy
  • Labor or miscarriage in the 12 weeks prior to the scheduled start of treatment.

Treatment and study plan

Sulfadiazine, Silver

Drug

Application of silver sulfadiazine ointment, bandage covered with gauze and bandage.

Skin of Nile tilapia

Device

Application of skin of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), as a biological occlusive dressing.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of days for complete re-epithelization in study A and B

    Time frame: Day 11

    Number of days until complete re-epithelialization observed by the evaluator

  2. Number of days for complete re-epithelization in study C

    Time frame: Day 21

    Number of days until complete re-epithelialization observed by the evaluator

  3. The number of dressings performed as needed in study A and B

    Time frame: Day 11

    Relation to the number of dressings performed in patients treated with Silver Sulfadiazine and Tilapia Skin throughout the treatment.

  4. The number of dressings performed as needed in study C

    Time frame: Day 21

    Relation to the number of dressings performed in patients treated with Silver Sulfadiazine and Tilapia Skin throughout the treatment.

  5. Amount of anesthetics or analgesics used throughout the treatment in study A and B

    Time frame: Day 11

    Use of anesthetics or analgesics required for the change of dressings performed throughout the treatment.

  6. Amount of anesthetics or analgesics used throughout the treatment in study C

    Time frame: Day 21

    Use of anesthetics or analgesics required for the change of dressings performed throughout the treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in scale of pain by the Visual Analogue Scale

    Time frame: Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15 and 30 (group A and B) and day 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 25 and 40 (group C).

    The visual Analogue scale consists of assisting in the assessment of pain intensity in the patient, being an important instrument to verify the evolution of the patient during the treatment. In each visit, the patient was instructed to respond as he rated his pain through scores ranging 0 to 10, where 0 to 2 meant mild pain, 3 to 7 meant moderate pain and 8 to 10 meant severe pain.

  2. Change in Global Clinical Impression Scale - Disease Severity (CGI-S) scores

    Time frame: Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15 and 30 (group A and B) and day 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 25 and 40 (group C).

    The evaluation of change in the scores of burn severity was performed by the physician during the study, using the global clinical impression scale - disease severity, which consistes of answering the following question - Considering your experience with this type of problem, what is the degree of severity of this patient's illness at the moment?? - Where, 0 means not evaluated, 1 - Much better, 2 - moderately better, 3 - Slightly better, 4 - unchanged, 5 - Slightly worse, 6 - Moderately worse and 7 - Much worse.

  3. Change in Global Clinical Impression Scale - Disease Improvement (CGI-I) scores

    Time frame: Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15 and 30 (group A and B) and day 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 25 and 40 (group C).

    The evaluation of change in the scores of burn improvement was performed by the physician during the study, using the global clinical impression scale - disease improvement, which consists of answering the following question - Compared to the initial state, how is the patient at this time? - Where, 0 means Not evaluated, 1 - Much better, 2 - moderately better, 3 - Slightly better, 4 - unchanged, 5 - Slightly worse, 6 - Moderately worse and 7 - Much worse.

  4. Change in patient global assessment scores

    Time frame: Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15 and 30 (group A and B) and day 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 25 and 40 (group C).

    The change in the patient burn-related symptoms was realized by answering the following question: Compared to the initial state, how is your disease-related symptoms at this time? - Where, 0 means much better, 1 - moderately better, 2 - Slightly better, 3 - unchanged, 4 - Slightly worse, 5 - Moderately worse and 6 - Much worse.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nucleo De Pesquisa E Desenvolvimento De Medicamentos Da Universidade Federal Do Ceara

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Randomised Clinical Study to Evaluate the Use of Tilapia Skin (Oreochromis Niloticus), as an Occlusive Biological Dressing, in the Treatment of Burn Wounds

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Jul 19, 2018
Registry last updated
Jul 19, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.