Burn Treatment Center, Dr. José Frota Institute
Fortaleza, Ceará, 60025-061, Brazil
NCT Number: NCT04391582
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Nile tilapia skin as a xenograft for the treatment of partial-thickness burn wounds in children.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me2 year–12 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Fortaleza, Ceará, 60025-061, Brazil
This is an open-label, monocentric, randomized phase II pilot study conducted in Fortaleza, Brazil. The study population consisted of 30 children between the ages of 2 and 12 years with superficial "partial-thickness" burns admitted less than 72 hours from the thermal injury. In the test group, the tilapia skin was applied. In the control group, a thin layer of silver sulfadiazine cream 1% was applied.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
After cleaning the lesion with tap water and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, the tilapia skin was applied and covered with gauze and bandage. These dressings were changed only if the tilapia skin did not adhere properly to the wound bed
After cleaning the lesion with tap water and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, a thin layer of silver sulfadiazine cream 1% was applied and covered with gauze and bandage. In these patients, the dressings were changed daily
Time frame: Day 11
The number of days to complete burn wound healing (≥95% reepithelialization), calculated via clinical judgment from the consultant.
Time frame: Day 11
The pain evaluation via the FPS-R was performed by the patient himself or herself if aged 5 years or more, or by their caregiver in patients under 5 years of age. The scale consists of six faces, presented horizontally, that depict different degrees of pain, from "no pain" to "most pain possible". A numerical value from 0 to 10 is assigned to each face.
Time frame: Day 11
The pain evaluation via CONFORT-B Scale was performed by the physician responsible and assessed the pain based in a behavioral that consisted in six factors: alertness, calmness/agitation, respiratory response (or crying), physical movement, muscle tone, and facial tension.Each factor was scored with values ranging between 1 and 5, generating scores between 6 and 30 points.
Time frame: Day 11
The pain evaluation via FLACCr scale was performed by the physician responsible and answered five evaluation categories based on behavioral parameters with combined scores ranging from zero to ten (classified the scores as follows: zero to three (mild pain); four to six (moderate pain) and seven to ten (severe pain).
Time frame: Day 11
In the test group, a dressing change was defined as the act of replacing the tilapia skin that did not adhere properly and/or replacing gauze and bandage that is full of exudate, after an evaluation of the dressing (performed every 48 hours). In the control group, a dressing change was defined as the daily act of cleaning the wound and reapplying the silver sulfadiazine cream 1%, which is then covered with new gauze and bandage.
Time frame: Day 11
To audit anesthetics and analgesics intake, nurses were trained to register on the patient's clinical record all analgesic and anesthetic medications used
Time frame: Day 3, day 5, day 7, day 9 and day 11
The CGI-I was evaluated by the physician responsible and answers the following question: "Compared to the patient's condition at admission to the project, this patient's condition is: 1 - very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2 - much improved; 3 - minimally improved; 4 - no change from baseline; 5 - minimally worse; 6 - much worse; 7 - very much worse since the initiation of treatment"
Time frame: Day 1, day 3, day 5, day 7, day 9 and day 11
The CGI-I was evaluated by the physician responsible and answers the following question: "Compared to the patient's condition at admission to the project, this patient's condition is: 1=very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse since the initiation of treatment."
Nucleo De Pesquisa E Desenvolvimento De Medicamentos Da Universidade Federal Do Ceara
Other
Pediatric Burn Treatment Using Tilapia Skin as a Xenograft for Superficial-Partial Thickness Wounds: a Randomized Controlled Phase II Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06131203
Burns, Wound Heal
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03113253
Burns, Surgery
Ars-Laquenexy, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02323165
Burns, Wounds
Gainesville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01169155
Burns, Burns, Inhalation
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details