Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06996574

Study to Compare the Clinical Effectiveness and Cost Utility of an All-in-one Procedure With an At-home Screening Trial

In 2019, the Dutch Healthcare Institute published a consensus report outlining when spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic pain qualifies for reimbursement under Dutch health insurance. It mandates that adult patients with significant pain (VAS ≥50mm or NRS ≥5) undergo an at-home screening trial, which must show at least 50% pain reduction to proceed with permanent implantation. Screening trials give patients early access to the therapy, but they are expensive, often redundant, and pose risks such as infection. A recent UK study (TRIAL-STIM) found no significant difference in outcomes between patients who had screening trials and those who received an all-in-one SCS procedure, but the trial strategy incurred greater costs. Given these findings, and the fact that all-in-one procedures are already used in certain Dutch cases, it is reasonable to evaluate this approach more broadly. Therefore, a pragmatic, multi-centre, randomized non-inferiority trial will compare the effectiveness of the all-in-one procedure, no trial group (NTG) to the standard two-step approach, trial group (TG) in Dutch patients with chronic neuropathic pain.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Amsterdam UMC

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Location status: Recruiting

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with chronic, neuropathic pain with an approved aetiology in the Netherlands PSPS (persistent spinal pain syndrome) PDN (painful diabetic neuropathy) CRPS (complex regional pain syndrome) SFN (small fibre neuropathy)
  • Suitable candidate according to the inclusion criteria of the Dutch "Standpoint on Neuromodulation in Chronic Pain" Adult patients ≥18 years Chronic pain ≥6 months Pain intensity of ≥50mm or ≥5 on VAS- or NRS-score respectively
  • Routinely selected for CL-SCS
  • Be willing to complete additional trial related questionnaires
  • Be willing and capable of giving informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • General exclusion criteria according to the Dutch "Standpoint on Neuromodulation in Chronic Pain":

Drug abuse Pregnancy Coagulation disorder / Use of anticoagulation therapy which cannot be stopped temporarily Active infection Life expectation ≤12 months Intake questionnaires "PROMS neuromodulatie" not completed by the patient

  • Have an existing drug pump and/or SCS system or another active implantable device such as a pacemaker, deep brain stimulator (DBS), or sacral nerve stimulator (SNS)
  • Current or previous treatment with an implanted pain reduction device
  • Participation in another clinical trial that may confound the results of this trial

Treatment and study plan

Randomization

Other

The all-in-one (NTG) procedure versus the established two-phase closed-loop SCS procedure with at-home screening trials (TG) under everyday clinical practice, that can be used for clinical decision-making and to inform health policy decisions.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 6 Months

    Time frame: up to 6 months post lead implant

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The primary outcome is the change in NRS score from baseline to 6 months.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Carin Wensing drs, Master of Science

CONTACT

[email protected]

+31 (0)20 - 5662533

E de Klerk S drs., Master of Science

CONTACT

[email protected]

+31 (0)20 - 5662533

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Pragmatic Randomised Prospective Multi-centre Non-inferiority Trial in Chronic Pain Patients With Closed-loop Spinal Cord Stimulation (CL-SCS) to Compare the Clinical Effectiveness and Cost Utility of an All-in-one Procedure With an At-home Screening Trial

Acronym: All-in-one

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
May 30, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 10, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.