Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02054325

Study Protocol Comparing Polidocanol Versus Hypertonic Glucose for Treatment of Reticular Veins

It will be done a randomized triple-blind study comparing 0,2% polidocanol versus 75% hypertonic glucose of sclerotherapy in lower limbs´ reticular veins. It will be included only adult women with reticular veins on the side of the thighs and mild venous insufficiency (CEAP 1). The primary endpoint will be efficacy, and secondary will be safety.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–69 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

School of Medicine at Botucatu- Paulista State University- UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil

Botucatu, São Paulo, 18607030, Brazil

About this study

Background. The prevalence of chronic venous disease is high in the general population, mainly in young women, and in milder cases the usual complaint is aesthetic. Various techniques are used for treatment of mild varicose disease, including surgical treatment, laser ablation and sclerotherapy. Reticular veins are those with less than 3mm diameter, bluish and important contribution to the aesthetic damage, and sometimes they are related to local pain and recurrence after treatment of telangiectasias. There is no consensus in the literature about the effectiveness of treatment with sclerotherapy, despite of being an usual procedure with different chemicals.

Methods and design. One hundred lower limbs of healthy women between 18 and 69 years will be triple blind randomized to receive treatment with polidocanol 0.2% diluted in 70% hypertonic glucose versus 75% hypertonic glucose for sclerotherapy treatment of reticular veins. The patients will be examined and clinically classified. It will be included patients with reticular veins sited at out's thigh/leg, measuring at least 10cm long, and only one extremity will be included per patient. The patients with varicose disease CEAP 2 or more will not be included. The treatment will be carried out in only one session and the medication volume not exceeding 5 ml. Clinical follow-up protocols will be filled on regular visits on days 0 - 7 - 60 concomitantly with photograph documentation. Supplementary examination for venous mapping with ultrasound pretreatment is performed for all patients.

Discussion. This prospective controlled double-blind randomized trial aims to verify and compare the efficacy and safety for sclerotherapy treatment of reticular veins of the lower limbs. The results may help physicians to choose the best sclerotherapy treatment for reticular veins.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • females
  • with at least 10 cm from the lateral reticular veins of the leg or thigh of the leg
  • clinical classification of chronic venous disease C1(mild venous disease),
  • minimum age of 18 year-old and maximum age 69 year-old
  • agreement with the study
  • signing the free and informed consent ( IC)
  • not use anticoagulant drugs .

Exclusion criteria

  • male
  • varicose disease in any quantity or location with clinical classification of chronic venous disease different of C1(mild venous disease)
  • restrict mobility
  • arterial insufficiency
  • be allergic to any substance that may be related to the study drugs
  • any cause of dermatitis on application site
  • free of comorbidities clinically serious as diabetes mellitus, heart failure, respiratory failure, uncontrolled hypertension with medication, and uncontrolled hypothyroidism
  • pregnancy
  • previous deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
  • family history of DVT
  • thrombophilia
  • do not agree with the search terms

Treatment and study plan

Polidocanol with Glucose

Drug

An application session 0.2% Polidocanol + 70% Glucose to treat reticular veins of the lower limb selected, with a maximum volume of 5 ml. Return to a week to investigate the adverse effects and 2 months for proof of efficacy and adverse effects

Other names: Dodecylpolyethyleneglycolether, Aethoxysklerol, Varithena

Glucose

Drug

An application session 75% Glucose to treat reticular veins of the lower limb selected, with a maximum volume of 5 ml. Return to a week to investigate the adverse effects and 2 months for proof of efficacy and adverse effects

Other names: Dextrose

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy in Treating Reticular Veins by Photographs: Mean Percent Reticular Vein Disappearance Two Months After Treatment.

    Time frame: Mean Percent of reticular vein disappearance two months after treatment

    Photographs were performed pretreatment and two months after the treatment, these were analyzed for efficacy in treat reticular veins by two blind analyzers objectively with measurement through the use of free software ImageJ.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Safety of the Treatment: Mean Percent of Skin Hyperpigmentation Two Months After Treatment

    Time frame: Two months after treatment.

    Skin hyperpigmentation was defined as a brownish hue stain superimposing the previous treated vein site (by visual photographic analyses). Skin hyperpigmentation was firstly evaluated according to its occurence and labeled as "Yes" or "No". Afterwards, when there was stain in the previous treated area, a line was drawn on the stain with Image J software , and the Mean Percent of Skin Hyperpigmentation was proportionaly compared with length of vein treated, previuos mesuread (mean and SD).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

UPECLIN HC FM Botucatu Unesp

Other

Collaborators

  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Triple-blind Study Protocol Comparing Polidocanol Versus Hypertonic Glucose for Sclerotherapy in Treatment of Reticular Veins at the Lower Limbs.

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Feb 4, 2014
Registry last updated
Jan 27, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.