University of Catania
Catania, CT, 95124, Italy
NCT Number: NCT04718311
The primary objective of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of Tacrolimus gel versus an anti-inflammatory mouthwash in an oral solution for the management of patients suffering from symptomatic OLP. The secondary objective was to analyze which one of the two treatments induced a greater risk of developing side effects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me25 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Catania, CT, 95124, Italy
Thirty nine patients were assigned, through a randomized design, to receive tacrolimus ointment 0.1% or a mouthwash composed of calcium hydroxide 10%, hyaluronic acid 0,3%, umbelliferone and oligomeric proanthocyanidins, or an anti-inflammatory mouthwash (mouthwash which contains calcium hydroxide, hyaluronic acid, Umbelliferone and Oligomeric Proanthocyanidins) for 3-months. At baseline (T0) and after 3 months (T1), patients were subjected to clinical and oral assessments and were evaluated for the symptoms (Numerical Pain Scale, NRS score) and signs (Thongprasom's score) of OLP. Data were calculated using T-test for the dependent variable, Wilcoxon test and Mann-Witney u test.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Treatments were topically applied for 5 days
Other names: Topical drug tacrolimus or mouthwash application
Time frame: 180 days
Patients clinically were evaluated using the scale used by Thongprasom et al. as reference. This gives a score that varies from 0 to 5, using a millimetre reference: 0, in the absence of lesions; 1, in the presence of hyperkeratosis streaks; 2, in the presence of an atrophic area less than 1 mm2; 3, in the presence of an atrophic area greater than
1 mm2; 4, in the presence of an erosive area less than 1 mm2; 5, in the presence of an erosive area greater than 1 mm2. In the presence of multiple injuries, the value has been calculated by summing the values of each injury.
University of Catania
Other
Analysis of Two Treatment Protocols for Patients With Oral Lichen Planus
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02276573
Lichen Planus, Lichen Planus, Oral
Nice, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06362005
Lichen Planus, Lichen Planus, Oral
Asyut, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04976673
Lichen Planus, Lichen Planus, Oral
Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT04673916
Lichen Planus, Lichen Planus, Oral
Messina, Italy
View Trial Details