An Ostomy Seal
DeviceAn absorptive ostomy seal
NCT Number: NCT07460323
This study will evaluate two Ostomy Seals/Rings in a group of post-operative patients.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
North Tees University Hospital, Stockton-on-Tees, County Durham, United Kingdom
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
An absorptive ostomy seal
The Ostomy Ring contains Aloe
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 9 weeks
The three PSC-related questions on the Ostomy Complication Severity Index (OCSI) are related to peristomal irritant dermatitis, peristomal bleeding, and hyperplasia. Each of these three items is rated on a scale of 0-3, with 0 indicating absence of the condition, and 3 indicating the condition is severe.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 9 weeks
Each of the OCSI items are scored on a scale of 0-3, with 0 indicating absence of the condition and 3 indicating the condition is severe.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 9 weeks
The leakage item on the OCSI has a scale of 0 (no leakage) to 3 (leakage approximately 1-2 times per day)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 9 weeks
Assessed only if leakage is reported in the OCSI tool (conditional). Responses: Great amount / Slight amount / None (ordinal categorical).
Time frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 9 weeks
Participant response to whether the study seal absorbed moisture/effluent from around the stoma/peristomal skin under the seal. Responses: Yes / Somewhat / No, not at all (ordinal categorical).
Time frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 9 weeks
Checklist of skin conditions present: burning, itching, maceration, fungal rash, folliculitis, granuloma, mechanical trauma, product sensitivity/allergy, pyoderma gangrenosum, other, none.
Time frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 9 weeks
Rated on a numeric scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst burning imaginable). Assessed only if burning is reported (conditional logic from Q25). Higher scores indicate worse burning.
Time frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 9 weeks
Rated on a numeric scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Assessed only if itching is reported (conditional logic from Q25). Higher scores indicate worse itching.
Time frame: From first PSC onset to resolution through end of treatment at 9 weeks
Unit of Measure: days
Time frame: From PSC resolution to first recurrence through end of treatment at 9 weeks
Unit of Measure: days
Time frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 9 weeks
Unit of Measure: percent (%)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 9 weeks
Rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (Very Satisfied) to 5 (Very dissatisfied)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 9 weeks
Rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (Very Satisfied) to 5 (Very dissatisfied)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 9 weeks
Single study-specific question assessing whether instructional resources (e.g., IFU, online guides) enabled correct use of the seal/ring; responses: Yes / No / Did not use instructional resources. Results will be reported as the proportion of participants in each response category.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 9 weeks
Participant response comparing seal size at application versus at barrier change. Responses: No, seal did not swell/expand / Yes, seal swelled/expanded.
Time frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 9 weeks
Participant response regarding whether swelling/expansion provided a better, more secure fit against leakage. Responses: No, not at all / Yes, somewhat / Yes, definitely (ordinal categorical).
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 9 weeks
Single study-specific question assessing perceived moisture-wicking away from peristomal skin. Responses: No, not at all / Yes, somewhat / Yes, definitely.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 9 weeks
Rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (Strongly agree) to 5 (Strongly disagree)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 9 weeks
Unit of measure: mean/median number used per participant (counts)
Time frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 9 weeks
Unit of measure: hours or days of wear time per application (time)
Time frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 9 weeks
Unit of measure: number of visits per participant; optionally proportion with ≥1 visit (counts/%)
Time frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 9 weeks
Unit of measure: currency (e.g., dollars)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Hollister Incorporated
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06583577
Ileal Conduit, Ostomy
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06213441
Ostomy
Aksaray, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06524401
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Fistula
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06310070
3D Printing, Leakage
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
View Trial Details