Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01925742

Study of the Efficacy of New Non-invasive Prenatal Tests for Screening for Fetal Trisomies Using Maternal Blood

Each year, 450,000 Canadian women become pregnant and, as a result of their participation in prenatal screening for Down syndrome, approximately 10,000 of them will have an amniocentesis (i.e. sampling of liquid surrounding the fetus) and of those, 315 will be found to carry a baby with Down syndrome and 70 normal pregnancies will be lost from complications of the procedure. It has been discovered recently that, during pregnancy, there is fetal DNA in maternal blood in sufficient quantities to be analysed and methods have been proposed to detect the presence or not of a fetus with Down syndrome using maternal blood. The introduction of genomic blood testing as proposed in the context of this project could lead to increased detection of Down syndrome, less invasive screening with 9700 amniocentesis avoided each year in Canada, improving the peace of mind of pregnant women, and preventing the accidental loss of 70 normal fetuses, at a lower overall cost than current practice. However, these methods still need to be validated before being appropriately introduced in routine care.

The study hypothesis is that new genomics-based non-invasive methods using fetal-DNA in maternal blood during pregnancy can be more effective than current prenatal screening methods for fetal aneuploidy.

This project will carry out an independent study that will validate the performance and utility of different new genomic technologies for screening in pregnant women using maternal blood. The team of researchers will compare the real-life performance of different non-invasive assays and strategies to screen for fetal aneuploidy, and identify an evidence-based cost-effective approach for implementation of this new technology in the Canadian health care system. The deliverables of this project will enable decision makers, pregnant women and their partner to make informed choices pertaining to prenatal genetic screening and diagnosis, such as screening for Down syndrome, and reduce the risk to pregnancies associated with amniocentesis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

The present study is a real life comparative effectiveness study that will compare the performances and costs of several prenatal screening modalities for fetal aneuploidy (see interventions).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

(High risk arm):

  • women 19 years or older between 10 weeks and 23 weeks 6 days gestation undergoing amniocentesis or CVS for:
  • positive prenatal screen;
  • abnormal ultrasound
  • previous pregnancy with trisomy
  • patient or partner carrier of Robertsonian translocation involving chr 21
  • positive NIPT result
  • Maternal age 40 or more

Inclusion criteria

(Low risk arm):

  • women 19 years and older who are 10 and 13 weeks 6 days gestation based on dating ultrasound (CRL) and are undergoing screening for Down syndrome (first trimester combined, SIPS or IPS)

Exclusion criteria

  • women with multiple gestations
  • women with twin demise (spontaneous or elective) at any gestational age
  • women with active or history of malignancy

Treatment and study plan

Integrated prenatal screening for Down's syndrome

Other

Analysis of several serum biochemical markers, and fetal nuchal translucency by ultrasound, with computation of an individual risk of fetal aneuploidy.

Other names: IPS, Prenatal serum screening, Aneuploidy screening, Down's syndrome screening, Downs' syndrome screening

Serum QUAD Assay for aneuploidy screening

Other

Series of biochemical markers with results integrated into a computational estimate of risk of fetal aneuploidy

Other names: First trimester QUAD prenatal screening assay

Semiconductor MPSS NIPT assay using ccfDNA in maternal blood

Other

Analysis by next-generation sequencing of ccfDNA (circulating cell-free DNA) from maternal blood, using a targeted NIPT assay.

Other names: NIPD, MPSS, Non-invasive prenatal testing, Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis

Optical-based MPSS NIPT assay using ccfDNA in maternal blood

Other

Analysis by next-generation sequencing of ccfDNA (circulating cell-free DNA) from maternal blood, using an un-targeted NIPT assay.

Other names: NIPD, MPSS, Un-Targeted NIPD, Non-invasive prenatal testing, Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis

Harmony™ Test (Ariosa Diagnostics)

Other

Test that is commercially available (Ariosa Diagnostics). (will be used for benchmarking purposes in a subset of each arm)

Other names: DANSR Assay

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of cases with Fetal trisomy 21, 18 or 13

    Time frame: 6 weeks after the delivery date

    Only pregnant women will be recruited, fetal outcome will be assessed by fetal karyotype or at or after delivery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of women with assay failure

    Time frame: At end of pregnancy.

Other outcomes

  1. Overall costs of screening algorithm

    Time frame: 6 weeks after delivery

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

Other

Collaborators

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  • Genome British Columbia
  • Genome Canada
  • Genome Quebec
  • Laval University

Registry information

Official study title

PEGASUS: PErsonalized Genomics for Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening USing Maternal Blood

Acronym: PEGASUS

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Aug 20, 2013
Registry last updated
Feb 22, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.