Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04425564

Study of Metronomic Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin Versus XELOX in Egyptian Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

Colorectal cancer (CRC) in Egypt is advanced tumors at diagnosis. Although, the dramatic increase in efficacy, reduction of mortality, and improvements in survival by the use of standard doses of chemotherapy, some CRC patients suffer from severe toxicities besides disease progression. Use of chemotherapy less than the maximum tolerated dose, with no prolonged drug free breaks incapacitates the cells to engage in progression mechanisms, suggesting that it could be a better alternative to standard dose therapy with better toxicity profile

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

This is a randomized phase II prospective study that included 70 (35 in each arm) metastatic Egyptian CRC cancer patients diagnosed at the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University between January 2016 and June 2018). Patients were randomly treated with either classic XELOX (arm A) or with capecitabine (2000 mg daily x 8 weeks) and oxaliplatin (30 mg/m2 weekly X 8 weeks) then 2 weeks rest (arm B). Toxicities and the survival analysis after two years for both regimens were recorded. Blood samples are taken from both groups to assess pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its relation to dosing.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient age 18-70 years of both sexes.
  • PS 0-2 and histologically proven mCRC with unresectable metastases (rectal cancer is included to left side cancers).
  • They should have measurable lesions (that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension using calipers or ruler and measurement must be at least 20 mm using conventional techniques or 10 mm using spiral CT scan).
  • No previous treatment for metastatic disease and had ended adjuvant treatment > 6 months.
  • peripheral neuritis less than grade 2.
  • Normal organ functions:(Creatinine ≤1.2, Bilirubin ≤1.2, SGOT/SGPT< 2N, HB >9gm/dl, WBC>3.5/dl with ANC >1.5/dl, Plat ≥100/dl).
  • For patients with liver metastases, Bilirubin should not be >2.5N and transaminases not >5N. (All patients were screened for HCV and HBS Ag by PCR).
  • Adequate cardiac functions (EF>55%)

Exclusion criteria

  • patients with only ascites or bone metastasis

Treatment and study plan

metronomic XELOX

Drug

Other names: Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin

Classic XELOX

Drug

Other names: Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin

Blood samples for pharmacological studies

Other

Other names: No other names

Primary outcomes

  1. response rates

    Time frame: two years

    Calculated with 95% confidence interval

  2. Rate of toxicities and grades

    Time frame: two years

    Categorical data summarized by pecentages

  3. Peak and trough levels of capecitabine and relation to dosing

    Time frame: Two years

    Numerical data summarized by means and standard deviation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression free survival

    Time frame: two years

    Cox proportional hazard model

  2. Overall survival

    Time frame: Two years

    Kaplan and Meier test

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute, Egypt

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Clinico-pharmacological Study of Metronomic Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin Versus Classic XELOX in Egyptian Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2019
First posted
Jun 11, 2020
Registry last updated
Jun 11, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.