Burosumab
Biologicalsolution for SC injection
Other names: KRN23, Crysvita®, UX023
NCT Number: NCT02163577
The objectives of the study are to:
* Identify a dose and dosing regimen of burosumab, based on safety and pharmacodynamic (PD) effect, in pediatric XLH participants * Establish the safety profile of burosumab for the treatment of children with XLH including ectopic mineralization risk, cardiovascular effects, and immunogenicity profile * Characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK)/PD profile of the KRN23 doses tested in the monthly (Q4) and biweekly (Q2) dose regimens in pediatric XLH patients * Determine the PD effects of burosumab treatment on markers of bone health in pediatric XLH patients * Obtain a preliminary assessment of the clinical effects of burosumab on bone health and deformity, muscle strength, and motor function * Obtain a preliminary assessment of the effects of burosumab on participant-reported outcomes, including pain, disability, and quality of life in pediatric XLH patients * Evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of burosumab
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me5 year–12 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Bicetre Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion
Exclusion
solution for SC injection
Other names: KRN23, Crysvita®, UX023
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
The RSS system is a 10-point radiographic scoring method that was developed to assess the severity of nutritional rickets in the wrists and knees based on the degree of metaphyseal fraying, cupping, and the proportion of the growth plate affected. Scores are assigned for the unilateral wrist and knee X-rays deemed by the rater to be the more severe of the bilateral images. The maximum total score on the RSS is 10 points and the minimum score is 0, with a total possible score of 4 points for the wrists and 6 points for the knees. Higher scores indicate greater rickets severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Data for urinary phosphorus and TRP were used in calculation TmP/GFR.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
The RSS system is a 10-point radiographic scoring method that was developed to assess the severity of nutritional rickets in the wrists and knees based on the degree of metaphyseal fraying, cupping, and the proportion of the growth plate affected. Scores are assigned for the unilateral wrist and knee X-rays deemed by the rater to be the more severe of the bilateral images. The maximum total score on the RSS is 10 points and the minimum score is 0, with a total possible score of 4 points for the wrists and 6 points for the knees. Higher scores indicate greater rickets severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
The RSS system is a 10-point radiographic scoring method that was developed to assess the severity of nutritional rickets in the wrists and knees based on the degree of metaphyseal fraying, cupping, and the proportion of the growth plate affected. Scores are assigned for the unilateral wrist and knee X-rays deemed by the rater to be the more severe of the bilateral images. The maximum total score on the RSS is 10 points and the minimum score is 0, with a total possible score of 4 points for the wrists and 6 points for the knees. Higher scores indicate greater rickets severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Changes in the severity of rickets and bowing were assessed centrally by three independent pediatric radiologists contracted by a central imaging facility using a disease specific qualitative RGI-C scoring system. The RGI-C is a seven point ordinal scale with possible values: +3 = very much better (complete or near complete healing of rickets), +2 = much better (substantial healing of rickets), +1 = minimally better (i.e., minimal healing of rickets), 0 = unchanged, -1 = minimally worse (minimal worsening of rickets), -2 = much worse (moderate worsening of rickets), -3 = very much worse (severe worsening of rickets).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Changes in the severity of rickets and bowing were assessed centrally by three independent pediatric radiologists contracted by a central imaging facility using a disease specific qualitative RGI-C scoring system. The RGI-C is a seven point ordinal scale with possible values: +3 = very much better (complete or near complete healing of rickets), +2 = much better (substantial healing of rickets), +1 = minimally better (i.e., minimal healing of rickets), 0 = unchanged, -1 = minimally worse (minimal worsening of rickets), -2 = much worse (moderate worsening of rickets), -3 = very much worse (severe worsening of rickets).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Changes in the severity of rickets and bowing were assessed centrally by three independent pediatric radiologists contracted by a central imaging facility using a disease specific qualitative RGI-C scoring system. The RGI-C is a seven point ordinal scale with possible values: +3 = very much better (complete or near complete healing of rickets), +2 = much better (substantial healing of rickets), +1 = minimally better (i.e., minimal healing of rickets), 0 = unchanged, -1 = minimally worse (minimal worsening of rickets), -2 = much worse (moderate worsening of rickets), -3 = very much worse (severe worsening of rickets).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Standing height Z scores are measures of height adjusted for a child's age and sex. The Z score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population (from the CDC growth charts) in the same age range and with the same sex. A Z score of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. Higher Z scores indicate a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
The total distance walked (meters) in a 6-minute period was measured. The percent of predicted values were calculated using published normative data based on age, gender, and height (Geiger et al. 2007).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
The POSNA-PODCI yields 4 functional assessment scores: Upper Extremity Function,Transfers and Basic Mobility, Sports and Physical Function, and Comfort/Pain. In addition, a Global Function score, which is an average of the 4 functional assessments, and a Happiness score are calculated. Raw, mean, standardized, and normative scores are calculated for each scale. Normative scores are calculated so that higher scores indicate better functioning. All scores are referenced to the general, healthy population with a normative mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
The POSNA-PODCI yields 4 functional assessment scores: Upper Extremity Function,Transfers and Basic Mobility, Sports and Physical Function, and Comfort/Pain. In addition, a Global Function score, which is an average of the 4 functional assessments, and a Happiness score are calculated. Raw, mean, standardized, and normative scores are calculated for each scale. Normative scores are calculated so that higher scores indicate better functioning. All scores are referenced to the general, healthy population with a normative mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
The POSNA-PODCI yields 4 functional assessment scores: Upper Extremity Function,Transfers and Basic Mobility, Sports and Physical Function, and Comfort/Pain. In addition, a Global Function score, which is an average of the 4 functional assessments, and a Happiness score are calculated. Raw, mean, standardized, and normative scores are calculated for each scale. Normative scores are calculated so that higher scores indicate better functioning. All scores are referenced to the general, healthy population with a normative mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
The POSNA-PODCI yields 4 functional assessment scores: Upper Extremity Function,Transfers and Basic Mobility, Sports and Physical Function, and Comfort/Pain. In addition, a Global Function score, which is an average of the 4 functional assessments, and a Happiness score are calculated. Raw, mean, standardized, and normative scores are calculated for each scale. Normative scores are calculated so that higher scores indicate better functioning. All scores are referenced to the general, healthy population with a normative mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
The POSNA-PODCI yields 4 functional assessment scores: Upper Extremity Function,Transfers and Basic Mobility, Sports and Physical Function, and Comfort/Pain. In addition, a Global Function score, which is an average of the 4 functional assessments, and a Happiness score are calculated. Raw, mean, standardized, and normative scores are calculated for each scale. Normative scores are calculated so that higher scores indicate better functioning. All scores are referenced to the general, healthy population with a normative mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
The POSNA-PODCI yields 4 functional assessment scores: Upper Extremity Function,Transfers and Basic Mobility, Sports and Physical Function, and Comfort/Pain. In addition, a Global Function score, which is an average of the 4 functional assessments, and a Happiness score are calculated. Raw, mean, standardized, and normative scores are calculated for each scale. Normative scores are calculated so that higher scores indicate better functioning. All scores are referenced to the general, healthy population with a normative mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
FEP is defined as 100% × (urine phosphorus × serum creatinine)/(urine creatinine × serum phosphorus), where the 2-hour urine sample was used for urine phosphorus and urine creatinine.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Time frame: Baseline, Week 40, 64, 160
Time frame: Week 40, 64, 160
Time frame: Up to 216 weeks
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. An SAE is defined as an AE or suspected adverse reaction that at any dose results in any of the following outcomes: death; life-threatening AE; inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions; a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Severity was graded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (life-threatening), 5 (death). TEAEs are defined as AEs with onset on or after the time of initiation of study drug administration.
Kyowa Kirin, Inc.
Industry
A Randomized, Open-Label, Dose Finding, Phase 2 Study to Assess the Pharmacodynamics and Safety of the Anti-FGF23 Antibody, KRN23, in Pediatric Patients With X-linked Hypophosphatemia (XLH)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05181839
Avitaminosis, Bone Diseases
Lille, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03748966
Avitaminosis, Bone Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02915705
Avitaminosis, Bone Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01571596
Avitaminosis, Bone Diseases
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial Details