GSK1358820
Drugbotulinum toxin type A
NCT Number: NCT00460564
This is a study to confirm the superior efficacy of a single treatment of GSK1358820 over placebo in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity of both the wrist and finger flexors using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) wrist score.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
GSK Investigational Site, Fukuoka, Japan
This is a study to confirm the superior efficacy of a single treatment of GSK1358820 over placebo in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity of both the wrist and finger flexors using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) wrist score.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Subjects eligible for enrollment in the study must meet all of the following criteria:
Exclusion criteria
botulinum toxin type A
Placebo
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change from baseline in MAS wrist score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension) to each time point in the DB phase was calculated. In the graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis and changes from baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS wrist score change curve and the horizontal axis was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS wrist score. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, and the AUC has a negative sign.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change from baseline in MAS wrist score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension) to each time point in the DB phase was calculated. In the graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis (HA) and changes from baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS wrist score change curve and the HA was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS wrist score. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, and the area under the AUC has a negative sign.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
The investigator assessed MAS wrist score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point in the double-blind phase. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
The investigator assessed MAS finger score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point in the double-blind phase. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
DAS scores of Hygiene, Pain, Dressing, and Limb posture were assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability). Prior to the first injection, the investigator, in consultation with the participant, selected one functional disability item and assessed it as a principal measure at each time point in the double-blind phase.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
DAS score of Hygiene was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point in double-blind phase.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
DAS score of pain was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
DAS score of Dressing was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
DAS score of Limb Posture was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
The investigator assessed the MAS wrist score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone to 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to week 48. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder ([less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
The investigator assessed the MAS finger score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to week 48. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
DAS scores of Hygiene, Pain, Dressing, and Limb posture were assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability). Prior to the first injection, the investigator, in consultation with the participant, selected one functional disability item and assessed it as a principal measure at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
The DAS score of Hygiene was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability; 3=Severe disability) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. BTX was injected in participants up to 3 times from Week 12 to Week 36 when participants met re-injection criteria. Measurements were taken at each point until Week 48 and summarized by the number of weeks after the re-injection in individuals (4, 8, and 12 weeks after each injection) in open-label phase; thus, measurements could have been taken up to Week 48 (12 weeks after the Week 36 injection).
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
The DAS score of Pain was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. BTX was injected in participants up to 3 times from Week 12 to Week 36 when participants met re-injection criteria. Measurements were taken at each point until Week 48 and summarized by the number of weeks after the re-injection in individuals (4, 8, and 12 weeks after each injection) in open-label phase; thus, measurements could have been taken up to Week 48 (12 weeks after the Week 36 injection).
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
The DAS score of Dressing was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. BTX was injected in participants up to 3 times from Week 12 to Week 36 when participants met re-injection criteria. Measurements were taken at each point until Week 48 and summarized by the number of weeks after the re-injection in individuals (4, 8, and 12 weeks after each injection) in open-label phase; thus, measurements could have been taken up to Week 48 (12 weeks after the Week 36 injection).
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
The DAS score of Limb Posture was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. BTX was injected in participants up to 3 times from Weeks 12 to 36 when participants met re-injection criteria. Measurements were taken at each point until Week 48 and summarized by the number of weeks after the re-injection in individuals (4, 8, and 12 weeks after each injection) in open-label phase; thus, measurements could have been taken up to Week 48 (12 weeks after the Week 36 injection).
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity Receiving a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled GSK1358820 Treatment Followed by an Open-Label GSK1358820 Treatment
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00460655
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Fukuoka, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT03251521
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT07704840
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT07695038
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Denizli, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details