GSK1358820
Drugbotulinum toxin type A
NCT Number: NCT00460655
This is a study to confirm the superior efficacy of GSK1358820 over placebo in patients with equinus deformity associated with post-stroke lower limb spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
GSK Investigational Site, Fukuoka, Japan
This is a study to confirm the superior efficacy of GSK1358820 over placebo in patients with equinus deformity associated with post-stroke lower limb spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
botulinum toxin type A
Placebo
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change from baseline in MAS ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension) to each time point in the DB phase was calculated. In the graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis and changes from baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS ankle score change curve and the horizontal axis was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS ankle score. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, and the AUC has a negative sign.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
The investigator assessed Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point in the double-blind phase. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
The investigator assessed the PRS of gait pattern consisting of 3 parameters. Affected limb was scored on a scale of -1 (worst) to 9 (best) based on 3 parameters (initial foot contact, foot contact at midstance, gait assistive devices) at each time point in double-blind phase.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
The time (seconds) required to walk 10 meters was measured at each time point in the double-blind phase.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
The investigator assessed Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
The investigator assessed the PRS of gait pattern consisting of 3 parameters. Affected limb was scored on a scale of -1 (worst) to 9 (best) based on 3 parameters (initial foot contact, foot contact at midstance, gait assistive devices) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
The time (seconds) required to walk 10 meters was measured at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Post-Stroke Lower Limb Spasticity Receiving a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled GSK1358820 Treatment Followed by an Open-Label GSK1358820 Treatment
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00460564
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Fukuoka, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT03251521
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT07704840
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT07695038
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Denizli, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details