-
LGG Cohort: ORR by Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years
Percentage of participants in the LGG cohort with a best overall confirmed CR or PR as assessed per RANO criteria by investigator assessment. The 95% CIs were computed using two-sided exact binomial method.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
-
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years
Time from first documented response (PR or CR) until disease progression or death as per RANO criteria. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy, were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
-
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years
Time from first documented response (PR or CR) until disease progression or death as per RANO criteria. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy, were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
-
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years
Time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression as per central independent review assessment using RANO criteria or death due to any cause. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.
-
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3 years and up to approx 4.2 years
Time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression as per investigator assessment using RANO criteria or death due to any cause. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.
-
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Response (TTR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.2 years
Time from randomization to first documented response of CR or PR as per central independent assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients without an event were censored either at the maximum follow-up time (if they experienced disease progression or death), or at their last tumor assessment date.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
-
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Response (TTR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.2 years
Time from randomization to first documented response of CR or PR as per investigator assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients without an event were censored either at the maximum follow-up time (if they experienced disease progression or death), or at their last tumor assessment date.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
-
LGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.2 years
Percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) which lasts for 24 weeks or longer.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
SD: Partient did not qualify for CR, PR, or progressive disease and has stable nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions on same or lower doses of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan and clinically stable status.
-
LGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.2 years
Percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) which lasts for 24 weeks or longer.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
SD: Partient did not qualify for CR, PR, or progressive disease and has stable nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions on same or lower doses of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan and clinically stable status.
-
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to 4.6 years
Time from first dose to death due to any cause in the LGG cohort. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. If a patient was not known to have died at the time of analysis cut-off, OS was censored at the date of last contact.
-
LGG Cohort: 2-year OS Estimate
Time frame: 2 years from first dose
OS was defined as the time from the first dose to death due to any cause in the LGG cohort. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier OS estimate represented the estimated percentage of participants remaining free from OS events for up to 2 years. If a patient was not known to have died at the time of analysis cut-off, OS was censored at the date of last contact
-
HGG Cohort: ORR by Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3.2 years and up to approx. 4.8 years
ORR in the HGG cohort defined as the percentage of participants in the HGG cohort with a best overall confirmed CR or PR as assessed per RANO criteria by investigator assessment. The 95% CIs were computed using two-sided exact binomial method.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
-
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3.2 years and up to approx. 4.8 years
Time from first documented response (PR or CR) until disease progression or death as per central independent assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
-
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 3.2 years and up to approx. 4.8 years
Time from first documented response (PR or CR) until disease progression or death as per investigator assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
-
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.8 years
Time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented disease progression as per central independent review assessment using RANO criteria or death due to any cause. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.
-
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Investigatort Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.8 years
Time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented disease progression as per investigator assessment using RANO criteria or death due to any cause. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients who had not progressed or died or had received further anticancer therapy were censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation.
-
HGG Cohort: Time to Response (TTR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.8 years
Time from start of treatment to first documented response of CR or PR as per independent assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients without an event were censored either at the maximum follow-up time (if they experienced disease progression or death), or at their last tumor assessment date.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
-
HGG Cohort: Time to Response (TTR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.8 years
Time from start of treatment to first documented response of CR or PR as per investigator assessment using RANO criteria. CIs were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. Patients without an event were censored either at the maximum follow-up time (if they experienced disease progression or death), or at their last tumor assessment date.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
-
HGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.8 years
Percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) which lasts for 24 weeks or longer.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
SD: Partient did not qualify for CR, PR, or progressive disease and has stable nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions on same or lower doses of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan and clinically stable status.
-
HGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
Time frame: Up to approx. 4.8 years
Percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) which lasts for 24 weeks or longer.
CR: Complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable and nonmeasurable disease sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions; and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be off steroids or only on physiologic replacement doses.
PR: ≥ 50% reduction, compared to baseline, in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters for all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks, no progression of nonmeasureable disease, no new lesions, and stable or improved nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions. Patient must be on a corticosteroid dose not greater than the dose at the time of baseline scan and be stable or improving clinically.
SD: Partient did not qualify for CR, PR, or progressive disease and has stable nonenhancing (T2/FLAIR) lesions on same or lower doses of corticosteroids compared with baseline scan and clinically stable status.
-
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to 5.1 years
Time from first dose to death due to any cause in the LGG cohort. Confidence Intervals were estimated using the Brookmeyer Crowley method. If a patient was not known to have died at the time of analysis cut-off, OS was censored at the date of last contact.
-
AUClast for Trametinib
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. AUClast is the area under the curve (AUC) from time zero to the last measurable concentration sampling time (tlast).
-
Cmax for Trametinib
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Cmax is the maximum plasma drug concentration after single dose administration
-
AUCtau for Trametinib
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. AUCtau is the AUC calculated to the end of a dosing interval (tau) at steady-state
-
Tmax for Trametinib
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Tmax is the time to reach maximum plasma concentration. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.
-
T1/2 for Trametinib
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. T1/2 is the elimination half-life
-
Ctrough for Trametinib
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Ctrough is the pre-dose plasma concentration
-
AUClast for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. AUClast is the area under the curve (AUC) from time zero to the last measurable concentration sampling time (tlast).
-
Cmax for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Cmax is the maximum plasma drug concentration after single dose administration
-
AUCtau for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. AUCtau is the AUC calculated to the end of a dosing interval (tau) at steady-state
-
Tmax for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Tmax is the time to reach maximum plasma concentration. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.
-
T1/2 for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. T1/2 is the elimination half-life
-
Ctrough for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
Time frame: Week 3 Day 1 pre-dose
PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. Ctrough is the pre-dose plasma concentration
-
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Taste of the Medication Before Rinsing the Mouth
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 5
Participants who received the dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on how it tasted before rinsing with water, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.
-
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Taste of the Medication Before Rinsing the Mouth
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 5
Participants who received the trametinib oral solution completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on how it tasted before rinsing with water, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.
-
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Assessment: After- Taste Once the Medication Was Swallowed
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 5
Participants who received the dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the after-taste of the medication after the medication was swallowed, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.
-
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Assessment: After- Taste Once the Medication Was Swallowed
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 5
Participants who received the trametinib oral solution completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the after-taste of the medication after the medication was swallowed, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.
-
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Immediate Reaction Once the Medication Was Placed Into the Mouth
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 5
Participants who received the dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the immediate reaction once the medication was placed into their mouth, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.
-
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Assessment: Immediate Reaction Once the Medication Was Placed Into the Mouth
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 5
Participants who received the trametinib oral solution completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the immediate reaction once the medication was placed into their mouth, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.
-
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Remaining After-taste Once Rinsing the Mouth With Water
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 5
Participants who received the dabrafenib dispersible tablets for oral suspension completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the after-taste of the medication after rinsing with water, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.
-
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Assessment: Remaining After-taste Once Rinsing the Mouth With Water
Time frame: Week 1 and Week 5
Participants who received the trametinib oral solution completed a questionnaire to evaluate the palatability of the pediatric formulation. After taking the medication, participants provided feedback on the after-taste of the medication after rinsing with water, rating their experience as very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad or very bad. The ratings of very good, good, and neither good nor bad were grouped together for reporting purposes.
-
LGG Cohort: PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 Scores- Global Health Score
Time frame: Baseline, and Day 1 of Week 5, 8, 16, 24, 32, 49, 48 and 56, and thereafter every 16 weeks until end of treatment (EOT), EOT, and every 16 weeks in the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase until disease progression (assessed up to 4.6 years)
The PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 was used to evaluate the quality of life of participants. The questionnaire included 7 items measuring the global health of the patient. 4 items used a 5-level Likert scale with 1=poor and 5=excellent; 1 item used a 5-level Likert scale with 1=never and 5=always; and 2 items used a 5-level Likert scale with 1=never and 5=almost always. The total raw global health score, ranging from 7 to 35, was computed by summing item values, with higher scores indicating better overall well-being. Raw scores were then transformed into T-scores, standardized with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores reflected better global health status.
Participants who discontinued treatment for reasons other than disease progression entered the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase, where the questionnaire was performed every 16 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent by patient or a parental/legal guardian, or lost to follow-up.
-
LGG Cohort: PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 Scores- Pain Score
Time frame: Baseline, and Day 1 of Week 5, 8, 16, 24, 32, 49, 48 and 56, and thereafter every 16 weeks until end of treatment (EOT), EOT, and every 16 weeks in the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase until disease progression (assessed up to 4.6 years)
The PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 was used to evaluate the quality of life of participants. The questionnaire included 1 item measuring the pain of the participants. Pain item used a 5-level Likert scale with 1= never and 5= almost always, higher scores indicate worsening pain. Raw scores were then converted into T-scores, standardized with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores indicated more severe pain experiences.
Participants who discontinued treatment for reasons other than disease progression entered the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase, where the PROMIS Parent Proxy Global 7+2 Health questionnaire was performed every 16 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent by patient or a parental/legal guardian, or lost to follow-up.
-
LGG Cohort: PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 Scores- Fatigue Score
Time frame: Baseline, and Day 1 of Week 5, 8, 16, 24, 32, 49, 48 and 56, and thereafter every 16 weeks until end of treatment (EOT), EOT, and every 16 weeks in the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase until disease progression (assessed up to 4.6 years)
The PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 was used to evaluate the quality of life of participants. The questionnaire included 1 item measuring the fatigue interference of the participants. Fatigue item used a 5-level Likert scale with 1= never and 5= almost always, higher scores indicate worsening fatigue. Raw scores were then converted into T-scores, standardized with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores indicated a greater level of reported fatigue.
Participants who discontinued treatment for reasons other than disease progression entered the post-treatment efficacy follow-up phase, where the PROMIS Parent Proxy Global 7+2 Health questionnaire was performed every 16 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent by patient or a parental/legal guardian, or lost to follow-up.