Biospecimen Collection
ProcedureUndergo collection of blood samples
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection
NCT Number: NCT03180502
This randomized phase II clinical trial studies the side effects and how well proton beam or intensity-modulated radiation therapy works in preserving brain function in patients with IDH mutant grade II or III glioma. Proton beam radiation therapy uses tiny charged particles to deliver radiation directly to the tumor and may cause less damage to normal tissue. Intensity-modulated or photon beam radiation therapy uses high-energy x-ray beams shaped to treat the tumor and may also cause less damage to normal tissue. It is not yet known if proton beam radiation therapy is more effective than photon-based beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy in treating patients with glioma.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine whether proton therapy, compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), preserves cognitive outcomes over time as measured by the Clinical Trial Battery Composite (CTB COMP) score (calculated from the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised [HVLT-R]) Total Recall, HVLT-R Delayed Recall, HVLT-R Delayed Recognition, Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) test, Trail Making Test (TMT) part A and part B.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess whether treatment with proton therapy preserves neurocognitive function as measured separately by each test, HVLT-R, TMT parts A & B, and COWA.
II. To document and compare treatment related symptoms, overall symptom impact, and disease related factor groupings, utilizing the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT), for both treatment arms.
III. To assess whether treatment with proton therapy, compared to IMRT, results in superior quality of life as measured by the Linear Analog Scale Assessment (LASA) scale.
IV. To compare local control patterns of failure and overall and progression-free survival between the two treatment arms.
V. To assess adverse events. VI. To compare Illumnia MethylationEPIC beadchip array-derived IDH and 1p19q status determined centrally to that submitted by enrolling sites.
TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess the impact of chemotherapy use on cognitive outcomes, symptom outcomes and quality of life.
II. To assess dose-response relationships between neuro-anatomic dosimetry and cognitive outcomes within and between treatment arms.
III. To evaluate the association between tumor molecular status and cognition at baseline and within and between treatment arms over time.
IV. To assess patterns of failure and pseudo progression as a function of radiation delivery type and dose received.
V. To assess local control, overall survival and, progression free survival in IDH mutant grade II and III tumors.
VI. To collect blood samples for future studies seeking to correlate changes in peripheral blood biomarkers (genes, micro ribonucleic acid [RNA], proteins, lymphocyte count, melatonin, etc) and the study endpoints.
VII. To document and compare the impact of low to intermediate gliomas and therapy on patients' work and activity participation (The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI:GH] Questionnaire: General Health version 2.0) as well as the relationship between changes in patients' work and activity participation and neurocognitive function and patient reported symptoms and interference.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients undergo photon-based IMRT once daily (QD), 5 days a week for 6 weeks for a total of 30 fractions. Beginning 28 days after completion of radiation therapy, patients receive standard of care temozolomide for 5 days. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of disease progression of unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and collection of blood samples throughout the trial.
ARM II: Patients undergo proton beam radiation therapy QD, 5 days a week for 6 weeks for a total of 30 fractions. Beginning 28 days after completion of radiation therapy, patients receive standard of care temozolomide for 5 days. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of disease progression of unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo MRI and collection of blood samples throughout the trial.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 6 and 12 months and then yearly for 10 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo collection of blood samples
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection
Undergo IMRT
Other names: IMRT, Intensity modulated radiation therapy (procedure), Intensity Modulated RT, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Radiation, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Correlative studies
Undergo MRI
Other names: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, MRIs, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, sMRI, Structural MRI
Undergo proton beam radiation therapy
Other names: External beam radiation therapy protons (procedure), External Beam Radiotherapy (protons), PBRT, Proton, Proton EBRT, Proton External Beam Radiotherapy, Proton Radiation Therapy, PROTON Therapy, Radiation, Proton Beam
Ancillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Drug
Other names: CCRG-81045, Gliotem, Imidazo[5,1-d]-1,2,3,5-tetrazine-8-carboxamide, 3, 4-dihydro-3-methyl-4-oxo-, M & B 39831, M and B 39831, Methazolastone, RP-46161, SCH 52365, Temcad, Temizole, Temodal, Temodar, Temomedac, TMZ
Time frame: Baseline to up to 10 years
Assessed with a general linear model with maximum likelihood estimation. Three models will be conducted. Baseline CTB COMP score, treatment arm, time, treatment by time interaction (if significant) and stratification factors will be included in the model for the primary endpoint. A second model will be built with these same variables and relevant covariates, such as total volume of intracranial disease, gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical tumor volume (CTV) size, histology, anti-epileptic use, and disease response to therapy (as measured by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology [RANO] criteria). Other than baseline score CTB COMP, treatment arm, and time, only covariates with a p-value < 0.10 will be retained in the model. A third model will be conducted at 10 years using the additional time points of neurocognitive assessments.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
The HVLT-R, TMT parts A & B, and COWA will be analyzed independently using a general linear model with maximum likelihood estimation. Standardized scores will be used.
Time frame: Baseline to up to 10 years
The change from baseline to each follow-up time point (calculated as baseline score subtracted from follow-up score) will be compared between treatment arms using a t-test, or Wilcoxon test if the data is not normally distributed. A reduced one-sided significance level will be used for the multiple comparisons in the MDASI-BT using the Bonferroni adjustment (alpha=0.017 for disease related factors and alpha=0.025 for treatment related symptoms and overall impact). A general linear model with maximum likelihood estimation will be used to assess symptom trends across time. Baseline score, treatment arm, time, treatment by time interaction (if significant), stratification factors, and relevant covariates, such as total volume of, GTV and CTV size, histology, anti-epileptic use, and disease response to therapy (as measured by RANO criteria) will be included as covariates in each model.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
The change from baseline to each follow-up time point (calculated as baseline score subtracted from follow-up score) will be compared between treatment arms using a t-test, or Wilcoxon test if the data is not normally distributed. A one-sided alpha=0.05 will be used for the LASA. A general linear model with maximum likelihood estimation will be used to assess symptom and QOL trends across time. Baseline score, treatment arm, time, treatment by time interaction (if significant), stratification factors, and relevant covariates, such as total volume of, GTV and CTV size, histology, anti-epileptic use, and disease response to therapy (as measured by RANO criteria) will be included as covariates in each model. Other than baseline score, treatment arm, and time, only covariates with a p-value < 0.10 will be retained in the model.
Time frame: From randomization to the date of death, assessed up to 10 years
OS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between arms using the log rank test. Cox proportional hazards models will be used for OS adjusting for treatment arm and stratification factors.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Local control will be estimated using cumulative incidence, treating death prior to an event as a competing risk. Gray's test will be used to compare local control rates between arms. Cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models will be used for local control, adjusting for treatment arm and stratification factors. A two-sided significance level of 0.05 will be used for comparisons between arms.
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of progression or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 10 years
A confidence interval will be used to determine if the PFS rate in the proton arm is greater than that in the photon at 1 year. PFS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between arms using the log rank test. Cox proportional hazards models will be used for PFS adjusting for treatment arm and stratification factors.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Counts of all AEs by grade will be provided by treatment arm. Counts and frequencies will be provided for the worst grade AE experienced by the patient by treatment arm. Grade 3+ treatment related AEs will be compared between arms using a chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test if cell frequencies are < 5, at the one-sided 0.05 significance level.
Time frame: Baseline
A single test will be done for both IDH and 1p19q testing centrally while sites will perform a separate test for IDH and 1p19q. The results from the central and site testing will be compared using the kappa statistic. The asymptotic test of H0: k=0 will be performed using the Z-statistic to determine the strength of agreement. Concordance and discordance rates will be tabulated.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Cognition will be compared between patients who have completed chemotherapy per protocol and those who have not.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
The dose-response relationship between cognition, using the CTB COMP and each individual test score, and neuro-anatomic dosimetry, including the hippocampus and whole brain, will be assessed. The decline, as calculated using the Reliable Change Index, will be used to determine neurocognitive impairment. The dose-response curve will be modeled using a non-linear model.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Cognition, using the CTB COMP and each individual test score, will be compared by 1p19q status. A general linear model using maximum likelihood estimation will be built for CTB COMP and each individual test score over time including baseline test score, 1p19q status, treatment arm, and stratification factors.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Cox models will also be built to assess the effect of radiation delivery type on patterns of failure while adjusting for stratification factors. Patterns of failure refer to local failure (within high dose), marginal failure (at edge of treatment field) or distant failure (outside radiation volume). The association of pseudoprogression, a yes/no variable, and radiation delivery type at each follow-up time point will be assessed using a Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test if the cell size is < 5. Pseudoprogression by treatment arm at each follow-up time point will also be assessed using a Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test if the cell size is < 5.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
The distributions of each item and outcome measure of the WPAI will be tabulated at each time point. The association between each of the four WPAI outcomes and NCF, as measured by the CTB COMP score and each NCF test separately, and symptoms, as measured by the MDASI-BT total symptom burden score and total interference score, will be assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients at each time point.
NRG Oncology
Other
A Phase II Randomized Trial of Proton Vs. Photon Therapy (IMRT) for Cognitive Preservation in Patients With IDH Mutant, Low to Intermediate Grade Gliomas
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04541082
Anaplastic Astrocytoma, Anaplastic Meningioma
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03072134
Adenoviridae Infections, Anaplastic Astrocytoma
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03975829
Anaplastic Astrocytoma, Anaplastic Ganglioglioma
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03434262
Anaplastic Astrocytoma, Anaplastic Ependymoma
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
View Trial Details