CINRYZE 500 U
DrugIV infusion administered twice weekly
NCT Number: NCT02865720
The purpose of this study is to determine if an investigational treatment is safe and well tolerated when administered by intravenous (IV) infusion in Japanese subjects with HAE.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me2 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Toyohashi, Aiti, Japan
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
OR If a child or minor (<20 years of age), have a parent/legal guardian who is informed of the nature of the study provide written informed consent (ie, permission) for the child to participate in the study before any study-specific procedures are performed. Assent will be obtained from children ≥14 years of age.
Exclusion criteria
IV infusion administered twice weekly
IV infusion administered twice weekly
Time frame: From start of study drug administration up to Week 12
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered an investigational product and that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as all AEs that started during the treatment period and up to 7 days after the last dose of investigational product, or AEs that were seen at baseline but worsened in frequency and/or severity during the treatment period and up to 7 days after the last dose of investigational product.
Time frame: From start of study drug administration up to Week 12
Physical examinations included measurement of body weight and height. Clinically significant abnormalities related to physical examination as determined by investigator were recorded and reported as AE.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Vital sign assessments included systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and pulse rate. Investigator used both absolute values and change from baseline values to determine if the vital sign was potentially clinically important. Criteria for the potential clinical importance of both absolute and change from baseline values were pre-specified as: SBP (less than [<] 90 millimeter of mercury [mmHg]; greater than or equal to [>=] 140 mmHg), DBP (< 60 mmHg; >=90 mmHg) and pulse (less than or equal to [<=] 50 beats per minute [bpm]; >= 100 bpm. A participant's vital sign had to meet both the absolute and change from baseline criteria to be considered as potentially clinically important.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Number of participants with potentially clinically important (PCI) clinical laboratory assessments reported as adverse events were reported.
Time frame: Week 1: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours (h) post-dose
C1 INH antigen concentration in plasma was determined using an automated nephelometric assay.
Time frame: Week 12: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h post-dose
C1 INH antigen concentration in plasma was determined using an automated nephelometric assay.
Time frame: Week 1: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h post-dose
Concentration of plasma complement C4 was reported.
Time frame: Week 12: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h post-dose
Concentration of plasma complement C4 was reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 1)
Concentration of plasma complement C1q was reported.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Angioedema attack was defined as any participant-reported (or caregiver-reported) indication of swelling or pain at any location following a report of no swelling or pain on the previous day (that is, there must have been a full symptom-free calendar day preceding the onset of symptoms for an attack to be considered a new attack). NNA was calculated as the overall number of angioedema attacks recorded during the period divided by the number of days in the period and multiplied by 30.4.Number of attacks was normalized for the number of days participants participated in a given period and expressed as the monthly frequency as compared to the historical data where, NNA was the number of angioedema attacks during 3 months prior to study drug administration. Historical data was obtained from medical or angioedema history electronic case report forms (eCRF).
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Anatomic locations where there was a presence of pain or swelling of any level of severity; mild, moderate or severe at any day during the attack were reported. Mild: the attack symptoms were noticeable but were easily tolerated by the participant and did not interfere with the participant's daily activities. Moderate: the attack symptoms interfered with the participant's ability to attend work/school or participate in family life and social/recreational activities and severe: the attack symptoms significantly limited the participant's ability to attend work/school or participate in family life and social/recreational activities. Number of participants with angioedema attacks in different anatomic locations in treatment period was compared to NNA for historical data. Historical data was based on the typical location of angioedema attacks in the 3 months prior to study drug administration. Here, H refers to historical and T refers to treatment.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
All attacks in each therapy period were assigned a value of 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe). Attack severity was considered the highest value assigned by the participant to any swelling location on any day during the attack. The average severity was derived by dividing the cumulative severity score by the total number of attacks. Average severity was set to 0 if there was no attack in a period. Average severity of angioedema attacks in treatment period compared to the NNA of angioedema attacks for historical data was reported. Historical data was based on the typical severity of angioedema attacks in the 3 months prior to study drug administration. Historical data was obtained from medical or angioedema history electronic case report forms (eCRF).
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Average duration of attacks was calculated by dividing the cumulative duration of attacks by the total number of attacks during the treatment period. Historical data was based on the typical severity of angioedema attacks in the 3 months prior to study drug administration. Average duration of angioedema attacks in treatment period was compared to the NNA for historical data. Historical data was obtained from medical or angioedema history eCRF.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
The normalized number of angioedema attacks was calculated as the overall number of angioedema attacks recorded during the period divided by the number of days in the period and multiplied by 30.4. NNA treated with rescue medications were reported for CINRYZE, non-CINRYZE C1-INH or not treated with C1-INH (including attacks treated with any medications other than C1-INH or untreated attacks). CINRYZE was only considered as a rescue medication when treated for breakthrough attack treatment. For historical data, only medications taken prior to the start of drug study drug administration and had an indication of "hereditary angioedema (HAE) management - acute treatment" selected on the prior and concomitant medications and therapy were considered as rescue medications. Historical data was obtained from medical or angioedema history eCRF.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Number of participants achieving at least 50 percent (%), 70% or 90% reduction in NNA relative to NNA for historical data was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Angioedema quality of life (AE-QoL) questionnaire was a self-administered validated angioedema disease-specific quality of life instrument. It consisted of 17 specific questions that were associated with work, physical activity, free time, social relations, and diet. Each of the 17 items had a 5-point response scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (Very Often). The questionnaire was scored according to the developers' guidelines to produce a total score and 4 domain scores (functioning, fatigue/mood, fear/shame, nutrition). Raw domain scores (mean of the item scores within each scale) and the raw total score (mean of all item scores) were rescaled using linear transformations into final percentage scores ranging 0 to 100, based on the maximum possible score, where the higher the score the greater the QoL impairment.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
A breakthrough attack was defined as an angioedema attack that occurs during long-term prevention therapy with CINRYZE (that is, between first study drug and last study drug dose). Number of participants with 1, 2, 3 or more angioedema attacks and who achieved initial improvement and complete resolution were also reported. Breakthrough angioedema attacks assessed by CINRYZE treatment, non-CINRYZE C1 INH treatment and untreated with C1-INH were reported. Here BAA refers to breakthrough angioedema attacks.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Time to initial improvement (TII) was calculated from the time of study drug administration to initial symptom improvement. Time to complete resolution was defined as the time from the onset of attack to complete resolution of all symptoms. Time to initial improvement and time to complete resolution as assessed by CINRYZE, non-CINRYZE and untreated were reported.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
The median time from onset of attack to time treated with CINRYZE was reported.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Time to initial improvement was calculated from the time of study drug administration to initial symptom improvement. Median time from treatment with CINRYZE to initial improvement was reported.
Shire
Industry
A Phase 3, Open-label, Single-period Study to Evaluate the Safety and Treatment Effect of Intravenous Administration of C1 Inhibitor (Human) for the Prevention of Angioedema Attacks and Treatment of Breakthrough Attacks in Japanese Subjects With Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07251933
Angioedema, Angioedemas, Hereditary
La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
View Trial DetailsNCT05509569
Angioedema, Angioedemas, Hereditary
Tokyo, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT05819775
Angioedema, Angioedemas, Hereditary
Litchfield Park, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06806618
Angioedema, Angioedemas, Hereditary
Grenoble, France
View Trial Details