Steve Hicks School of Social Work, the University of Texas at Austin
Austin, Texas, 78712, United States
NCT Number: NCT03407742
The proposed specific aims of this K01 pilot study were:
1. Develop a culturally adapted and web-enhanced version of the Parent Management Training-the Oregon model (GenerationPMTO) intervention for first generation Hispanic families with youth. 2. Implement a small randomized controlled trial (RCT) with the culturally adapted and web-enhanced version of the GenerationPMTO intervention. 3. Systematically examine the implementation feasibility (i.e., rates of engagement, retention, and cultural acceptability) and initial efficacy of the adapted intervention (i.e., reduced parental stress and depression, increased quality of parenting skills, reduced levels of internalizing and externalizing behaviors in youth, and reduced adolescent substance use likelihood).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me12 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Austin, Texas, 78712, United States
Recruitment. Participants were recruited according to eligibility criteria, in close collaboration with community partners. Specifically, health and mental health care centers, as well as community organizations and churches were targeted for recruitment activities. Recruitment also consisted of snowball recruitment from participants exposed to the intervention.
General Description of the Intervention. The Parent Management Training-Oregon model (GenerationPMTO) intervention is delivered primarily to parents in order to strengthen parenting skills in a safe learning environment that empower parents to implement these skills at home. The development of the original GenerationPMTO Spanish manual was conducted by Dr. Domenech-Rodriguez according to a comprehensive model of cultural adaptation research.
The intervention consisted of GenerationPMTO and culturally-focused sessions. The GenerationPMTO-focused sessions are detailed in the core treatment manual and have been translated into Spanish utilizing a rigorous process of translation and consultation with Hispanic scholars. Culturally-focused sessions integrated content from three sources. First, we informed sessions according to relevant literature focused on biculturalism. We also informed the intervention by addressing specific cultural themes that were identified as salient in our qualitative studies, which correspond to existing literature on risk and protective factors associated with Hispanic youth. Finally, parents were invited to reflect on additional cultural values and experiences that they consider relevant to their parenting efforts.
With regard to content of individual sessions, module 1 addressed issues associated with immigration, Hispanic culture, and bicultural frameworks. Module 2 addressed issues associated with parenting and biculturalism. Modules 3-6 covered the GenerationPMTO core components as they apply to adolescent populations. Module 7 consists of an in-person session to refine and troubleshoot parenting skills that parents may consider particularly challenging. To enhance the cultural relevance of GenerationPMTO components, we will present all GenerationPMTO parenting skills according to bicultural frameworks, a strategy highly effective the R34 study.
Modules 8-9 reinforced issues of biculturalism having exposed parents to all PMTO core components. A strong focus on biculturalism is particularly relevant as empirical research has demonstrated that the promotion of biculturalism constitutes an effective protective factor for Hispanic youth in first generation Hispanic families.
Randomization. The individual family was the unit of computer-derived randomization, with PTMO-control balance sought for (a) gender of target youth, and (b) time of recruitment. Assessments. Data collection was completed after recruitment (T1) and upon intervention completion (T2).
Intervention Delivery. The intervention was delivered in a major faith-based organization as this site was the preferred site selected by Latino/a parents. In addition to the parenting intervention, a strong advocacy approach was implemented to address various needs of parents (e.g., referral to job training programs or immigration services).
Analyses. Tests of the primary hypothesis will involve fitting of the more assumption-laden subject-specific multivariate response model to Likelihood of Youth Substance Use (LYUS) sub-scale values, followed by fitting of the somewhat more conservative Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) marginal model with the advantage of fewer assumptions.Our papers will report crude and covariate-adjusted efficacy estimates from both models, allowing readers to draw inferences based on either or both approaches. These same models are used to test the secondary efficacy hypotheses about program impact on parenting skill levels, youth internalizing/externalizing behaviors, and parent stress levels.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Parent Inclusion Criteria:
Youth inclusion criteria:
Parent Exclusion Criteria:
Focal Youth exclusion criteria:
9-week parenting intervention
Time frame: Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements
Measures quality of parenting practices aimed at improving parent-youth relationship. Scale 0-4, with lower scores indicating worse outcome.
Time frame: Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements
Measures quality of parenting practices aimed at motivating children's self-sufficient behaviors. Scale 0-4 with lower scores indicating worse outcomes.
Time frame: Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements
Measures quality of parental limit setting skills. Scale 0-4 with lower score indicating worse outcome.
Time frame: Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements
Measures quality of parenting practices focused on monitoring and supervision. Scale 0-4 with lower score indicating worse outcome.
Time frame: Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements
Measures quality of parenting practices aimed at helping youth develop problem solving skills. Scale 0-4 with lower score indicating worse outcome.
Time frame: Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements
Measures changes in youth's perception of drug use. Scale 0-4 with higher score indicating best outcome.
Time frame: Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements
Measures likelihood of youth engaging in drug use. Scale 0-5 with higher score indicating best outcome. Scale 1-5 with higher score indicating worse outcome.
Time frame: Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements
Measures youth's internalizing and externalizing problematic behaviors. Scale 0-2 with lower scores indicating worse outcomes.
Time frame: Measured 4-5 months after T1 measurements
Measures level of acculturation in parents and youth. Scale 1-5. Lower scores indicate US oriented identity and high score indicate Latino-oriented identity.
Time frame: Measure 4-5 months after T1 measurements
Measurements parental stress characteristic of Hispanic immigrant populations. Score 0-5 with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
University of Texas at Austin
Other
Strengthening Hispanic Families Via NIDA Prevention Science
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05930535
Adolescent - Emotional Problem, Adolescent Behavior
Chisinau, Moldova
View Trial DetailsNCT06366438
Adolescent Behavior, Adolescent Development
Bromma, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT03496155
Adolescent Behavior, Behavior
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03379090
Adolescent Behavior, Behavior
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
View Trial Details