The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
NCT Number: NCT03496155
The purpose of this study is to test a strengths-based intervention to be delivered in a primary care setting with adolescents and a parent. Investigators want to find out if the intervention can help parents and teens communicate. Specifically Investigators want to see if they can help parents and teens identify and build teen's strengths. Half the dyads will receive the educational materials in conjunction with their teen's well-child visit, while the other half will receive usual care at the well-child visit and receive the educational materials at the end of the study. Additionally, Investigators expect that a strengths-based intervention may also impact adherence to treatment in youth with a chronic illness. As such, Investigators will include a subgroup of teenagers diagnosed with asthma in this study, to assess whether the strengths-based intervention that the Investigators developed has an impact on adherence.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me13 year–15 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Recent research suggests that parents and adolescents report an interest in doctors facilitating increased parent-teen communication about teen strengths. However, little research focuses on how to address this need in a primary care setting. Content from subject matter experts along with data gathered from parents and teens were used to develop a novel strengths-based intervention to be tested in primary care.
The study intervention being examined is called the Strengths Intervention Project and includes a written pamphlet, a guided discussion activity, in-person/phone health coaching, and in-person or mailed health care provider endorsement and key messaging. Measures will be collected at baseline pre-intervention (T1), in clinic or over the phone at the time of the intervention (T2), approximately two weeks post-intervention (T3), and approximately 2 months post-intervention (T4). Daily diaries will also be utilized twice to gather data pre- and post- intervention. We will measure feasibility of clinic implementation of intervention, as well as influence of intervention on parent-teen communication and adolescent outcomes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Adolescent Criteria:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Parent Criteria:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This is a clinic based psychoeducational intervention for adolescent patients and their parents to improve parent-teen communication about teen strengths. The intervention is designed, if possible, to coincide with the adolescent patients' well-child visits and consists of the following components: (1) In-person or over the phone orientation session with a trained health coach and parent, (2) Distribution of psychoeducational materials to the parent, (3) Endorsement and delivery of key messages from the health care provider, and (4) "Booster" phone call placed by the health coach.
Time frame: Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4)
26 items (parents only); Likert scale (1= very unlikely; 7= very, very likely)
Time frame: Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4)
20 items (parent and teens); Likert scale (1= strongly disagree; 5= strongly agree)
Time frame: Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4)
15 items (parents and teens); Likert scale (1=strongly disagree; 5= strongly agree)
Time frame: 9 months
Feasibility will be demonstrated by consent rates ≥60%
Time frame: 1 month
Completion of core intervention components ≥ 70%.
Time frame: 2-weeks post intervention (T3)
Adolescent and parent acceptability ratings ≥80%. Investigators will also elicit open-ended feedback.
Time frame: 2-months post intervention (T4)
2 items (parents and teens); Yes/No/Not sure and Likert scale (1=very likely; 5 very unlikely)
Time frame: 9 months
Provider acceptability ratings ≥80%. Investigators will also elicit open-ended feedback.
Time frame: Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4)
Measure of psychological well-being. 8 items (parents and teens). (Likert scale 1= Strongly disagree; 2= Disagree; 3= Slightly disagree; 4= Mixed or neither agree nor disagree; 5= Slightly agree; 6= Agree; 7= Strongly agree). Score will be summed for range of 8 (Strong Disagreement with all items) to 56 (Strong Agreement with items). High scores signify that respondents view themselves in positive terms in important areas of functioning.
Time frame: Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4)
2-items about adherence to inhaled controller medication use (parent and teen) will be assessed using the Visual analog scale (0-10).
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Other
Acronym: SIP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03436628
Adolescent Behavior, Autoimmune Diseases
East Lansing, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06408818
Behavior, Communication
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04342871
Behavior, Cancer
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05377749
Behavior, Cancer
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details