YR Gaitonde Center for AIDS Research and Education
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600010, India
NCT Number: NCT02969915
This clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of integrated care centers vs. integrated care centers plus HIV patient treatment incentives for achieving HIV treatment targets among people who inject drugs and men who have sex with men in India. The investigators will also assess cost-effectiveness and barriers and facilitators to implementation through targeted mixed-methods approaches. This study is a model for improving HIV treatment outcomes in key populations in low to middle-income countries.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600010, India
The trajectory of the HIV epidemic in coming decades will be determined by the degree to which we can identify infected persons and engage them in care - a point implicit in the ambitious UNAIDS "90-90-90" target, which sets 90% goals for HIV diagnosis, linkage of infected persons to sustained antiretroviral therapy (ART), and viral suppression in those treated. Meeting this target requires successful engagement of difficult to reach populations, such as people who inject drugs (PWID) and men who have sex with men (MSM), who bear a disproportionate share of the epidemic, particularly in low to middle income countries. Our team is nearing completion of a multi-site cluster-randomized trial in India to assess the effectiveness of integrated care centers (ICCs) for PWID and MSM compared to usual care. ICC process measures from the first year show robust uptake of HIV counseling and testing, the primary outcome for that trial, but slower than anticipated ART uptake. Demand-side interventions in public health (such as treatment incentives) can be particularly effective when paired with optimized treatment accessibility (i.e., supply). Consequently, the investigators propose to examine whether provision of HIV care and treatment incentives to ICC clients will improve overall utilization of the clinics and downstream HIV care continuum outcomes.
The investigators propose a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design. This will include a 16-site, pair-matched cluster randomized trial to compare the effectiveness of adding of HIV care incentives to ICCs (ICC+) versus standard ICCs on HIV care continuum outcomes, including ART initiation, adherence and viral suppression. Effectiveness will be compared at the ICC level (from a cohort of HIV-infected ART-eligible clients followed in each ICC and process measures deriving from all ICC clients) and at the community-level through a cross-sectional sample accrued via respondent-driven sampling (RDS) 2 years after initiation of the intervention. Because PWID and MSM will be sampled independently from the ICCs in the RDS, it provides an opportunity to characterize outcomes like community viral load and HIV incidence, reflecting impact within the broader PWID/MSM communities. As an exploratory sub-aim, we will use a rigorous scientific design to assess the effects of withdrawing (vs. continuing) incentives beyond the initial intervention phase. Additionally, the investigators will determine the cost-effectiveness of the ICC+ intervention.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Treatment incentives are offered to HIV-positive participants for reaching treatment targets, including retention to medical follow-up, initiating antiretroviral therapy, and maintaining high adherence with antiretroviral therapy.
Other names: ICC+
ICCs offer key-population-oriented, vertically-integrated harm reduction, HIV testing, and HIV treatment services
Other names: ICC
Time frame: 12 months
Viral Suppression defined as HIV RNA <150 copies/mL
Time frame: 6 months
Viral suppression defined as HIV RNA <150 copies/mL
Time frame: 18 months
Viral suppression defined as HIV RNA <150 copies/mL
Time frame: 24 months
Viral suppression defined as HIV RNA <150 copies/mL
Time frame: 24 months
Proportion with viral suppression (HIV RNA <150 copies/mL) at one or more follow-up visits
Time frame: 12 months
Rate of ART initiation among those naive to ART at baseline. This is reported as the proportion of participants who initiated ART.
Time frame: 12 months
Proportion of participants who attended one or more visits to a government ART clinic in both the 0 to 6 month period and the 6 to 12 month period.
Time frame: 12 months
Proportion of participants who had a medication possession ratio of 0.9 or higher after starting ART
Time frame: 12 months
All-cause mortality
Johns Hopkins University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05805306
Behavior, Blood-Borne Infections
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05732675
Behavior, Bisexuality
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
View Trial DetailsNCT03577301
Behavior, Blood-Borne Infections
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03763942
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Behavior
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial Details