Stepped care
OtherPatients meeting a non-response criterion will be stepped up to the next step
NCT Number: NCT05562037
This feasibility trial will focus on older adults 60+ who are candidates for cardiac or pulmonary rehabilitation and who are vulnerable, mildly or moderately frail. The investigators will randomize older frail adults living in rural regions of the county to Treatment as usual (TAU) or Stepped care (SC). TAU refers to center-based rehabilitation (CBR). Patients randomized to SC will be enrolled in traditional CBR and based on prespecified non-response criteria, will step up to three services: 1) Transportation-subsidized CBR, 2) Home-based telerehabilitation (TR), and 3) Community health worker-(CHW) supported home-based TR.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me60 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Berkshire Medical Center, Inc, Pittsfield, Massachusetts, United States
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) decreases mortality and both CR and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improve function, quality of life, and decrease readmission rates. Despite their proven efficacy, both programs are grossly underutilized, with fewer than 20% of eligible persons participating. Patients with heart and lung disease living in rural communities have even lower rates of participation.
The objective of this proposal is to test the feasibility of performing a full-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness and value of a stepped care (SC) model versus treatment as usual (TAU) in older frail adults living rural counties. TAU refers to center-based rehabilitation (CBR). The SC model includes initial enrollment into CBR followed by possible step up to three interventions based on prespecified non-response criteria: 1) Transportation-subsidized CBR, 2) Home-based telerehabilitation (TR), and 3) Community health worker-(CHW) supported home-based TR. Unlike traditional SC models, the initial treatment in this model, i.e. CBR, is not the least resource intensive. CBR was chosen as the initial option because it is currently considered the standard of care.
The investigators will conduct a parallel, 2-arm, randomized controlled feasibility trial. Eligible participants will be randomized to TAU (CBR) or SC. Because of the urgent need to address underuse of both CR and PR in rural regions, the proposed feasibility trial will enroll patients referred to either CR or PR. Both arms include an in-person intake evaluation conducted by a certified rehabilitation nurse in the rehabilitation center to determine exercise tolerance and design a tailored 8-week rehabilitation program. Patients randomized to TAU participate in two weekly sessions at the center and are encouraged to exercise at home in between sessions. Patients randomized to the SC arm will also be enrolled in the CBR program. Those who meet prespecified non-response criteria will be stepped up to transportation-subsidized CBR. Providing transportation may not be sufficient for frail older adults who are reluctant to leave their homes in the winter, unfamiliar with exercising, or do not want to exercise in a group setting. Thus, non-responders, will be stepped up to home-based TR. Home-based rehabilitation will be supported by Chanl Health, a virtual platform that supports education and self-management, remote monitoring, and coaching by rehabilitation specialists. Non-responders will be stepped up to CHW-supported home-based TR. The CHW will be help participants use the mobile app, access educational materials, clarify educational content, and exercise during biweekly in-person visits.
Purpose: Heart and lung disease are the first and third leading causes of mortality in the US, respectively. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) decreases mortality and both CR and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improve function, quality of life, and decrease readmission rates. Despite their proven efficacy, both programs are grossly underutilized, with fewer than 20% of eligible persons participating. Patients living in rural communities have even lower rates of participation. Home-based CR and PR has been developed with the goal of improving uptake, and low to moderate strength evidence indicates that these programs are as effective as center-based programs. Further work is needed, however, to examine how best to increase utilization of CR and PR in rural communities. While several studies have examined approaches to improve referral and enrollment, there is little evidence on how to optimize adherence to CR, and no evidence how to optimize adherence to PR.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Attended pulmonary or cardiac rehabilitation within the previous two years
Patients meeting a non-response criterion will be stepped up to the next step
Time frame: 3 years
Average number of eligible patients randomized per month
Time frame: 8 weeks
Proportion of older frail adults randomized to SC attending prescribed rehabilitation sessions
Time frame: 8 weeks
Average number of sessions attended in SC arm
Time frame: 8 weeks
Proportion in SC arm completing outcome measures
Time frame: 8 weeks
Baseline Measurement Completion- The investigators need to reach >80% of baseline data to move forward with this study
Time frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
NIH PROMIS computer adaptive test (CAT) to assess dyspnea severity.
Time frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
NIH PROMIS CAT to assess dyspnea functional limitation.
Time frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
NIH PROMIS ACT to assess physical function.
Time frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
NIH PROMIS CAT to assess social isolation.
Time frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of Rehabilitation
NIH PROMIS CAT to assess anxiety.
Time frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
NIH PROMIS CAT to assess Depression/Sadness.
Time frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
Physical Activity Scale for the elderly. The PASE is a brief, 12-item, reliable, validated questionnaire used to measure physical activity in older adults. Activities are scored using frequency, duration and intensity parameters over the previous week.
Time frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
Health-related quality of life will be measured using the EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated and widely used generic health status questionnaire that measures amount of difficulty with mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Time frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
Smoking will be quantified by self-report (number of cigarettes smoked per day)
Time frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
The 6-MWT is a widely used and well-validated measure of functional exercise capacity. The 6-MWT measures the distance that a patient can walk quickly on a flat, hard surface over six minutes. It is self-paced and assesses sub-maximal aerobic capacity and endurance.
Time frame: 1 week prior to start and 1 week after completion of rehabilitation
Physical Function and Mobility will be measured using SPPB which includes a walking speed test, a hierarchal balance test (feet side by side, semi tandem stance, tandem stance), and a 5-times sit to stand test, each scored on a 0-4 scale.
Time frame: 3 years
The investigators will look at data already obtained in the research project to determine the number of non-response criteria and average number of days on each step to develop a new protocol for a randomized clinical trial.
Time frame: 14 months from the time of first patient enrollment
Semi-structured telephone interviews of randomly selected 15 participants to evaluate feasibility of study interventions. Interviews will elicit participants' views and experiences with all aspects of the intervention including personnel, components of the rehabilitation program, data collection procedures, their likes and dislikes about the SC program, and when relevant, reasons for non-adherence. The research staff will also interview the CHW and feedback from RNs to determine the factors that facilitated or impeded the delivery of the intervention and to identify procedures in the protocol which could be improved upon for the full-scale trial.
Peter Lindenauer, MD
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06583395
Adnexal Diseases, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Palm Desert, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03193294
Angina Pectoris, Angina, Stable
Clydebank, Dunbartonshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT04163484
Acute Kidney Injury, Angina Pectoris
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT02776657
Angina Pectoris, Angina, Stable
View Trial Details