Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT02664740

Standard Treatment Associated With Phage Therapy Versus Placebo for Diabetic Foot Ulcers Infected by S. Aureus

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of standard treatment associated with a topical anti-staphylococcal bacteriophage cocktail versus standard treatment plus placebo for diabetic foot ulcers monoinfected by methicillin-resistant or susceptible S. aureus (MRSA or MSSA) as measured by the relative reduction in wound surface area (%) at 12 weeks.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1 / Phase 2

Primary location

CHU de Bordeaux - Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The secondary objectives of this study are:

A. To compare the two study arms in terms of treatment safety and tolerance throughout the study.

B. To compare the two study arms in terms of further changes in wound healing at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12.

C. To describe the changes in the resistance and virulence of S. aureus (if present in the wound) from baseline to week 4, at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any) and at week 12 if the wound is still not healed.

D. To describe in the two study arms the antibiotic resistance status of other bacteria isolated from wounds at week 4, at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any) and at week 12 if the wound is still not healed.

E. To describe in the two study arms changes in wound microbiota from baseline to week 4, at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any) and at week 12 if the wound is still not healed.

F. To describe the production of anti-phage antibodies during the topical treatment: baseline and week 4, at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any), and at week 12.

G. Creation of a biobank for future ancillary studies (including, but not limited to, cytokine levels and cellular immune responses): days 0 and week 4, as well as week 12.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Participant pre-inclusion criteria:

  • The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • The patient is at least 18 years old
  • The patient has type 1 or type 2 diabetes
  • The patient is hospitalized/consulting in a participating centre
  • The patient has a wound below the ankle that has be evolving for >2 weeks
  • The patient has a neuropathic foot wound, classified S (0 or 1), I (0 or 1), N (1), B (1), A (0 or1) and D (1) according to the SINBAD classification,
  • without ischaemia or with non-critical ischaemia defined by: ankle arterial pressure > 50 mm Hg or toe systolic arterial pressure > 30 mm Hg or TcpO2 > 30 mm Hg )
  • with a surface area ≥ 0,5 cm2
  • With IWGDF/IDSA grade 2 or 3 infection without osteomyelitis (normal radiography*)
  • Females of childbearing potential or Sexually active males with partner of childbearing potential: commitment to consistently and correctly use an acceptable method of birth control (oral, transdermal, systemic or implant contraception birth control, intrauterine devices) for 1 month after the last study drug administration
  • Negative pregnancy test must be obtained before starting any experimental drug
  • Females of non-childbearing potential: either surgically sterilized or at least 1 year postmenopausal (amenorrhea duration at least 12 months)

Participant final inclusion criteria:

  • The patient has a neuropathic foot wound:
  • Classified S (0 or 1), I (0 or 1), N (1), B (1), A (0 or1) and D (1) according to the SINBAD classification,
  • without ischaemia or with non-critical ischaemia defined by: ankle arterial pressure > 50 mm Hg or toe systolic arterial pressure > 30 mm Hg or TcpO2 > 30 mm Hg )
  • with a surface area ≥ 0,5 cm2
  • With IWGDF/IDSA grade 2 or 3 infection without osteomyelitis
  • The patient's wound is monoinfected by methicillin-resistant or susceptible S. aureus (MSSA or MRSA ), or infected by MSSA or MRSA and other bacteria (a total of 3 bacteria when accounting for MSSA or MRSA)
  • The Phagogram of the patient demonstrated that the strains are susceptible to at least one phage(PP1493 and/or PP1815).

Participant pre-exclusion criteria:

  • The patient is participating in, or has participated in over the past three months, another trial
  • The patient is participating in, or has participated in over the past three months, another study that may interfere with the results or conclusions of this study
  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • The patient is under judicial protection, or is an adult under guardianship
  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
  • The patient refuses to sign the consent
  • The patient is pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding. Patients should not be enrolled if they plan to become pregnant during the treatment period and 1 month after the last administration of study drug
  • Women/Men refusing to use an effective contraception during and1 month after the last administration of study drug

Participant final exclusion criteria:

  • The patient refuses to participate to the study
  • The patient is pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding. Patients should not be enrolled if they plan to become pregnant during the treatment period and 1 month after the last administration of study drug
  • Women/Men refusing to use an effective contraception during and1 month after the last administration of study drug
  • Patients with diabetic foot wounds associated with clinical or radiographic signs of arthritis or osteomyelitis*
  • Patient is not infected by S. aureus or infected by more than 3 bacteria even if the culture isolates a S. aureus.

Treatment and study plan

Topical anti-Staphylococcus bacteriophage therapy

Drug

Patients randomized to the experimental arm will receive sterile compress dressings impregnated with a phage solution of 10^7 PFU/ml on days 0, 7 and 14 (unless the wound is already healed, i.e. phage solutions are not applied to healed wounds).

Topical placebo corresponding to anti-Staphylococcus bacteriophage therapy

Drug

Patients randomized to the placebo arm will receive sterile compress dressings impregnated with a placebo solution on days 0, 7 and 14 (unless the wound is already healed, i.e. placebo solutions are not applied to healed wounds).

Primary outcomes

  1. The relative reduction in wound surface area (%)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Immediate Safety

    Time frame: Day 0, 1 hour after application of experimental dressing

    The presence/absence of the following symptoms during each 1 hour observation periods following the application of each experimental wound dressing: local side effects (local rash onset or worsening of local inflammatory signs) and general symptoms (vital signs, fever, rash, arthralgia, gastro-intestinal symptoms...) will be performed.

  2. Immediate Safety

    Time frame: Day 7, 1 hour after application of experimental dressing

    The presence/absence of the following symptoms during each 1 hour observation periods following the application of each experimental wound dressing: local side effects (local rash onset or worsening of local inflammatory signs) and general symptoms (vital signs, fever, rash, arthralgia, gastro-intestinal symptoms...) will be performed.

  3. Immediate Safety

    Time frame: Day 14, 1 hour after application of experimental dressing

    The presence/absence of the following symptoms during each 1 hour observation periods following the application of each experimental wound dressing: local side effects (local rash onset or worsening of local inflammatory signs) and general symptoms (vital signs, fever, rash, arthralgia, gastro-intestinal symptoms...) will be performed.

  4. The number of MedDRA coded Adverse Events per patient

    Time frame: throughout the study; 12 weeks

  5. The presence/absence of abnormal laboratory results

    Time frame: throughout the study; 12 weeks

  6. Wound surface area

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  7. Wound surface area

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  8. Wound surface area

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  9. Wound surface area

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  10. Wound surface area

    Time frame: 10 weeks

  11. Wound surface area

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  12. Wound depth

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  13. Wound depth

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  14. Wound depth

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  15. Wound depth

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  16. Wound depth

    Time frame: 10 weeks

  17. Wound depth

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  18. Time to healing

    Time frame: censored at 12 weeks

  19. The % of completely healed wounds

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  20. Classification of Staphylococcus isolates as MSSA or MRSA resistant

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    MSSA: Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus MRSA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

    What is reported is a binary result: isolates are classified as either "MSSA" or "MRSA"

  21. Classification of Staphylococcus isolates as MSSA or MRSA resistant

    Time frame: at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)

    MSSA: Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus MRSA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

    What is reported is a binary result: isolates are classified as either "MSSA" or "MRSA"

  22. Classification of Staphylococcus isolates as MSSA or MRSA resistant

    Time frame: at week 12 if the wound is still not healed

    MSSA: Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus MRSA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

    What is reported is a binary result: isolates are classified as either "MSSA" or "MRSA"

  23. Classification of Staphylococcus isolates according to clonal complexes (virulence classification)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  24. Classification of Staphylococcus isolates according to clonal complexes (virulence classification)

    Time frame: at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)

  25. Classification of Staphylococcus isolates according to clonal complexes (virulence classification)

    Time frame: at week 12 if the wound is still not healed

  26. Presence/absence of non-Staphylococcus aureus bacteria that are antibiotic-resistant

    Time frame: week 0

  27. Presence/absence of non-Staphylococcus aureus bacteria that are antibiotic-resistant

    Time frame: week 4

  28. Presence/absence of non-Staphylococcus aureus bacteria that are antibiotic-resistant

    Time frame: at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)

  29. Presence/absence of non-Staphylococcus aureus bacteria that are antibiotic-resistant

    Time frame: at week 12 if the wound is still not healed

  30. Wound microbiota: OTU richness

    Time frame: week 0

    OTU: Operational Taxonomic Unit

  31. Wound microbiota: OTU richness

    Time frame: week 4

    OTU: Operational Taxonomic Unit

  32. Wound microbiota: OTU richness

    Time frame: at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)

    OTU: Operational Taxonomic Unit

  33. Wound microbiota: OTU richness

    Time frame: at week 12 if the wound is still not healed

    OTU: Operational Taxonomic Unit

  34. Wound microbiota: Shannon's Diversity

    Time frame: week 0

  35. Wound microbiota: Shannon's Diversity

    Time frame: week 4

  36. Wound microbiota: Shannon's Diversity

    Time frame: at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)

  37. Wound microbiota: Shannon's Diversity

    Time frame: at week 12 if the wound is still not healed

  38. Wound microbiota: Functional richness

    Time frame: week 0

  39. Wound microbiota: Functional richness

    Time frame: week 4

  40. Wound microbiota: Functional richness

    Time frame: at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)

  41. Wound microbiota: Functional richness

    Time frame: at week 12 if the wound is still not healed

  42. Wound microbiota: Functional diversity

    Time frame: week 0

  43. Wound microbiota: Functional diversity

    Time frame: week 4

  44. Wound microbiota: Functional diversity

    Time frame: at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)

  45. Wound microbiota: Functional diversity

    Time frame: at week 12 if the wound is still not healed

  46. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus relative to other bacteria in the wound

    Time frame: week 0

  47. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus relative to other bacteria in the wound

    Time frame: week 4

  48. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus relative to other bacteria in the wound

    Time frame: at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)

  49. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus relative to other bacteria in the wound

    Time frame: at week 12 if the wound is still not healed

  50. Wound microbiota: the number of Staphylococcus strains in a wound

    Time frame: week 0

  51. Wound microbiota: the number of Staphylococcus strains in a wound

    Time frame: week 4

  52. Wound microbiota: the number of Staphylococcus strains in a wound

    Time frame: at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)

  53. Wound microbiota: the number of Staphylococcus strains in a wound

    Time frame: at week 12 if the wound is still not healed

  54. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus relative to other bacteria in the wound

    Time frame: week 0

  55. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus relative to other bacteria in the wound

    Time frame: week 4

  56. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus relative to other bacteria in the wound

    Time frame: at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)

  57. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus relative to other bacteria in the wound

    Time frame: at week 12 if the wound is still not healed

  58. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus relative to other Staphylococcus in the wound

    Time frame: week 0

  59. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus relative to other Staphylococcus in the wound

    Time frame: week 4

  60. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus relative to other Staphylococcus in the wound

    Time frame: at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)

  61. Wound microbiota: the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus relative to other Staphylococcus in the wound

    Time frame: at week 12 if the wound is still not healed

  62. Wound microbiota: ordination scores on each of two principal components extracted from UniFrac distances between all bacterial samples taken during the study

    Time frame: week 0

  63. Wound microbiota: ordination scores on each of two principal components extracted from UniFrac distances between all bacterial samples taken during the study

    Time frame: week 4

  64. Wound microbiota: ordination scores on each of two principal components extracted from UniFrac distances between all bacterial samples taken during the study

    Time frame: at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)

  65. Wound microbiota: ordination scores on each of two principal components extracted from UniFrac distances between all bacterial samples taken during the study

    Time frame: at week 12 if the wound is still not healed

  66. The presence/absence of anti-phage antibodies in plasma samples

    Time frame: week 0

  67. The presence/absence of anti-phage antibodies in plasma samples

    Time frame: week 4

  68. The presence/absence of anti-phage antibodies in plasma samples

    Time frame: at modification of the first-line treatment or new antibiotic prescription (if any; most likey at 14 days and before 12 weeks)

  69. The presence/absence of anti-phage antibodies in plasma samples

    Time frame: at week 12 if the wound is still not healed

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Albert Sotto, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+33.(0)6.09.56.66.55

Christophe Masseguin, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+33.(0)4.66.68.68.36

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Other

Collaborators

  • Phagenix

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of the Efficacy of Standard Treatment Associated With Phage Therapy Versus Standard Treatment Plus Placebo for Diabetic Foot Ulcers Monoinfected by Staphylococcus Aureus: a Randomized, Multi-centre, Controlled, 2-parallel-group, Double-blind, Superiority Trial

Acronym: PhagoPied

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jan 27, 2016
Registry last updated
Mar 20, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.