Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04095299

Standard Dose Versus High Dose of Radiotherapy in Rectal Preservation With Chemo-radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients

In recent years, an increasing number of retrospective and prospective observational studies have indicated that a subset of rectal cancer patients may avoid surgery if they can achieve a complete response to chemoradiotherapy. Prospective trials, including the previous Danish Watchful Waiting trials (NCT00952926, NCT02438839) in early rectal cancer have demonstrated high levels of organ preservation with dose-escalation, but it is unclear whether this was primarily due to tumor stage or dose level.

The aim of the present study is to investigate if a higher dose of radiotherapy is superior compared to a standard dose in patients with early rectal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy with curative intent.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The main curative treatment modality for rectal cancer is surgery, potentially combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy to lower the risk of local recurrence. In recent years, an increasing number of retrospective and prospective observational studies have indicated that a subset of patients may avoid surgery altogether if they can achieve a complete response to chemoradiotherapy. These studies have mainly focused on locally advanced tumors with a high risk of local recurrence. Smaller, less advanced tumors appear to respond better to chemoradiotherapy, but the optimal treatment for non-surgical management has not been established. Prospective trials, including the previous Danish Watchful Waiting trials (NCT00952926, NCT02438839) in early rectal cancer have demonstrated high levels of organ preservation with dose-escalation, but it is unclear whether this was primarily due to tumor stage or dose level. High-level evidence is currently absent for the question of radiotherapy dose, especially in early stage cancers.

The aim of the present study is to investigate if a higher dose of radiotherapy is superior compared to a standard dose in patients with early rectal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy with curative intent.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histopathologically verified adenocarcinoma of the rectum
  • MDT conference finds patient a candidate for rectal resection
  • Clinical tumor category cT1-3
  • MRI findings
  • Maximal cross-sectional size of 4.5 cm (axial plane relative to the rectum)
  • Lowest edge of tumor located at or below the peritoneal reflection on MRI
  • Performance status 0-2
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Eligible for radiotherapy and capecitabine according to investigator, including
  • Adequate function of bone marrow (neutrophils ≥ 1.5 x 10^9/l and thrombocytes ≥ 100 x 10^9/l)
  • Adequate function of liver (ALAT < 2.5 x upper limit of normal, bilirubin < 2.5 x upper limit of normal)
  • Adequate kidney function (Serum creatinine < 1.5 x upper limit of normal or measured GFR > 30 ml/min)
  • Fertile women must present a negative pregnancy test and use secure contraceptives during and three months after treatment
  • Written and orally informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous surgical treatment of the present cancer, including transanal excision of tumor
  • Other malignant disease within the past five years except non-melanoma skin cancer and premalignant lesions such as carcinoma in situ
  • Distant metastases verified by imaging or biopsy, i.e. cM1
  • Previous radiation treatment of the pelvis
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Existing colostomy or ileostomy

Treatment and study plan

50.4 Gy to the tumor and elective volume

Radiation

Standard radiotherapy

62 Gy to the clinical tumor volume and 50.4 Gy to the elective volume

Radiation

Experimental radiotherapy

Capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily on weekdays

Drug

Standard chemotherapy

Primary outcomes

  1. Rectal preservation at two years

    Time frame: 2 years after start of treatment

    • Presence of a full-length rectum, i.e. no rectal resection.
    • Absence of rectal tumor, malignant lymph nodes or any other tumor deposit or recurrence within the pelvis based on clinical examination, CT and MR
    • No stoma because of side effects to treatment or rectal dysfunction

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of complete response within four months from start of radiotherapy

    Time frame: 4 months

  2. Locoregional recurrence (within the pelvis)

    Time frame: At least yearly up to 5 years

  3. Relapse free survival

    Time frame: At least yearly up to 5 years

  4. Overall survival

    Time frame: At least yearly up to 5 years

  5. Colostomy-free survival

    Time frame: At least yearly up to 5 years

  6. Quality of life as assessed ny the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) CR29+C30

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

    QLQ is a 30-question assessment of quality of life. Twenty-eight questions are assessed on a scale of 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much); 2 questions are assessed on a scale of 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). Score range 0- 100. In the function scales, score 100 is best (more function). In the symptom scales, score 100 is worst, (more symptoms). The colorectal cancer module QLQ-CR29 should always be complemented by QLQ-C30. It contains four functional scales and 18 symptom scales. Some scales are dependent on gender and some are for patients with or without a stoma. There are 19 individual items assessed on a scale of 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). Scores are totaled from each item to form the scales, and then normalized to 0-100.

  7. Frequency of grade 3-4 toxicity according to CTCAE v4

    Time frame: Up to 5 years

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Lars H Jensen, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+45 7940 6802

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Vejle Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Trial of Standard Dose Versus High Dose of Radiotherapy in Rectal Preservation With Chemo-radiotherapy to Patients With Early Low and Mid Rectal Cancer: The Watchful Waiting 3 Trial (WW3)

Acronym: WW3

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2033
First posted
Sep 19, 2019
Registry last updated
Jan 8, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.