NCT Number: NCT00655213
Spontaneous Atrio Ventricular Conduction Preservation
In case of sinus node dysfunction, it is often necessary to choose the safer option provided by a DDD pacemaker even though the most appropriate mode of pacing is AAI mode.
In addition to saving energy, the latter mode allows spontaneous ventricular activation, the haemodynamic consequences of which are, in most cases, better than those obtained with dual chamber pacing.
Recent studies as the MOST study suggest also that ventricular desynchronization imposed by right ventricular apical pacing even when AV synchrony is preserved increases the risk of atrial fibrillation in patients with SND. Similar results were already given by anterior studies (PIPAF) which, taking into account the percentage of ventricular pacing, suggested that AF prevention algorithm in combination with a preserved native conduction are efficient in reducing AF burden.
However, current practice is to implant a dual chamber pacemaker to prevent the risk of atrioventricular block (AVB) even if DDDR pacing with a fixed long AV delay was found inefficient in reducing ventricular pacing and was associated with a high risk of arrhythmias.
The Symphony 2550 cardiac pacemaker offers pacing modes that automatically switch from AAI(R) mode to DDD(R) or DDI(R) in event of severe atrioventricular conduction disorder, irrespective of whether or not these are accompanied by an atrial arrhythmia, returning spontaneously to AAI(R) mode as soon as the spontaneous AV conduction has resumed. These 2 particular modes are called the AAI SafeR and DDD/AMC (R) mode.
The main differences between both modes are that (i) AAI SafeR does not trigger any AV Delay after a sensed or paced atrial event which allows long PR intervals or even limited ventricular pauses with no switch to DDD(R), while (ii) DDD/AMC (R) is able to optimize AV Delay after switching to DDD(R) according to measured spontaneous conduction times and to provide an acceleration in case of vaso-vagal syndrome. This pacing mode has previously been assessed in clinical studies.
This study intends to demonstrate that the automatic modes switching significantly reduce the percentage of ventricular pacing in patients implanted with a spontaneous AV conduction and reduce the occurrence of atrial arrhythmias, on a mid-term follow-up period, in comparison to standard DDD pacing with long AVDelay.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary location
Onze lieve Vrouw ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Patient has been primo-implanted with a Symphony™ 2550 or 2450 devices for less than 3 months
- Patient with a normal spontaneous AV conduction at rest (PR < 250 ms)
- Patient implanted for Sinus Node Dysfunction, Braycardia-Tachycardia Syndrome, carotid sinus syndrome/ vaso vagal syndrome or paroxistic AV Block
- Patient implanted with a bipolar right-atrial lead and ventricular lead available in the local market
- Patient has signed a consent form after having received the appropriate information
Exclusion criteria
- Permanent 1st, 2nd or 3rd AV block
- Patient having a medical status complying with one of the following cases
- patient suffering from sustained ventricular arrhythmias
- patient having sustained a myocardial infarction within the last month
- patient having undergone cardiac surgery within the last month
- patient suffering from severe aortic stenosis
- patient suffering from unstable angina pectoris
- patient presents with permanent atrial arrhythmias
- Patient is not able to understand the study objectives and protocol or refuses to co-operate
- Patient is not available for scheduled follow-up
- Patient has a life expectancy less than one year
- Patient is included into another clinical study
- Patient is minor or a pregnant woman
Treatment and study plan
Symphony DR 2550
DevicePrimary outcomes
-
mean percentage of ventricular pacing between the randomized branches on a two-months period (M3 visit)
Time frame: 2 months
-
mean percentage of ventricular pacing between the studied groups during the whole study (up to 1 year).
Time frame: 12 months
Secondary outcomes
-
percentage of ventricular pacing two month after randomization versus the percentage reported at the end of the first month follow-up in AAIsafeR mode.
Time frame: 12 months
-
AF burden relatively to the branch of the protocol
Time frame: 12 months
-
evolution of conduction disturbances by documentings nature, number and duration of ario-ventricular blocks.
Time frame: 12 months
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
LivaNova
Industry
Registry information
Acronym: SAVER
Important dates
- Study start
- 2003
- Primary completion
- 2006
- Study completion
- 2006
- First posted
- Apr 9, 2008
- Registry last updated
- Apr 9, 2008
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
BIOTRONIK Conduction System Pacing With the Solia Lead - Solia CSP S
NCT06540079
Arrhythmia, Sinus, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsThe Fluoroless-CSP Trial Using Electroanatomic Mapping
NCT03903107
Arrhythmia, Sinus, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsAllometric-Pace Study
NCT05766462
Arrhythmia, Sinus, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
View Trial DetailsLBBAP Data Collection Registry
NCT05887323
Arrhythmia, Sinus, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
View Trial Details