China-Japan Friendship Hospital
Beijing, China
NCT Number: NCT07744659
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective in treating post-stroke spasticity in adults. It will also evaluate the safety of the implanted SCS system. The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. Does active SCS reduce limb spasticity compared with sham stimulation? 2. What device-related problems do participants experience during the study?
All participants receive the same implantation and programming procedures,but no therapeutic stimulation(0 mA) for sham SCS group duringthe first 6 weeks after randomization.
Participants will:
1. Have an SCS system surgically implanted 2. Be randomly assigned to receive active SCS or sham SCS for 6 weeks 3. After completion of the 6-week randomized comparison period, active stimulation will be initiated for all participants. 4. Attend a post-operative visit within 3 to 7 days after surgery for device activation or sham activation, programming, safety checks, and study assessments 5. Attend follow-up visits for study assessments at approximately 6, 12, 24 weeks, 1 year and 2 years after randomization 6. Complete assessments of muscle spasticity, joint range of motion, motor function, walking ability, daily functioning, pain, and quality of life 7. Report any medical problems or device-related problems during the study
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Beijing, China
Post-stroke spasticity is a common disabling complication of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. It can lead to abnormal muscle tone, restricted joint movement, impaired motor function, pain, and reduced independence in daily activities. Current treatments include rehabilitation therapy, oral antispastic medications, and botulinum toxin injections, but some patients continue to have clinically significant spasticity despite these treatments. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a neuromodulation technique that delivers electrical stimulation to the spinal cord and may help regulate abnormal spinal motor circuits and reduce spasticity.
Previous exploratory studies have suggested that SCS may reduce limb spasticity and improve muscle strength, motor coordination, and functional movement after stroke. However, the available evidence is mainly based on small or exploratory studies, and the safety and efficacy of SCS for post-stroke spasticity have not yet been confirmed in a large, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial. Therefore, a well-designed controlled study is needed to determine whether the observed improvements are caused by active SCS and to further evaluate device-related safety.
The Spinal Cord Stimulation for Post-Stroke Spasticity study (SCS-PSS study) is a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an implanted SCS system for adults with post-stroke spasticity. The study will enroll 92 participants with stable unilateral upper- or lower-limb spasticity after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke who have not achieved their treatment goals with previous treatments. All participants will undergo implantation of an SCS system and will then be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either active SCS or sham SCS during the first 6 weeks after randomization. Participants will attend a postoperative visit within 3 to 7 days for active or sham device activation, programming, safety assessment, and study evaluations. At 6 weeks after randomization, all participants will receive active stimulation and will continue follow-up through 24 weeks. In addition, they will undergo long-term follow-up for up to 2 years to further evaluate the durability of treatment effects and the long-term safety of the implanted SCS system. The primary outcome is the change from baseline to 6 weeks after randomization in the mean Modified Ashworth Scale score of primary target muscle groups. Additional outcomes include joint range of motion, motor function, walking ability, functional independence, pain, quality of life, adverse events, serious adverse events, and device deficiencies.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will receive therapeutic electrical stimulation through the implanted spinal cord stimulation system beginning on Day 0, defined as the day of active or sham activation within 3-7 days after surgery. An individualized SCS programming strategy will be used. Initial stimulation parameters will include a frequency of 40-60 Hz, a pulse width of 200-300 μs, and a low starting amplitude that will be gradually increased according to participant tolerance. For participants with concomitant conditions such as pain, the stimulation frequency may be increased as clinically appropriate. Intermittent stimulation will be preferred, and electrode contact combinations will be individually selected. Active stimulation will continue through the 24-week follow-up
Participants will undergo the same implantation and programming procedures. On Day 0, the implanted system will be turned on, but the stimulation amplitude will be set to 0 mA so that no effective electrical stimulation is delivered during the 6-week randomized comparison period. After completion of the Week 6 assessment, participants will receive active SCS using the same individualized programming principles as the Active SCS Group. Active stimulation will continue through the 24-week follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 6 after randomization
The primary outcome is the change in the mean Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of the Primary Target Muscle Groups from baseline to Week 6. The Primary Target Muscle Groups are selected from a upper or lower limb before treatment and must include at least two muscle groups.
For the upper limb, eligible muscle groups include the shoulder adductors, shoulder internal rotators, elbow flexors, elbow extensors, forearm pronators, wrist flexors, and finger flexors.
For the lower limb, eligible muscle groups include the hip flexors, hip adductors, hip internal rotators, knee flexors, knee extensors, and ankle plantar flexors.
For analysis, the original MAS grades are converted to a 0-5 numerical scale, with grade 1+ converted to 2 and grades 2, 3, and 4 converted to 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The mean MAS score is calculated across the selected Primary Target Muscle Groups. Change is calculated as the Week 6 mean MAS score minus the baseline mean MAS score.
Time frame: Day 0, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Year 1, and Year 2 after randomization
Change in MAS of the primary target muscle groups from baseline to day 0, week 6, week 12, week 24, 1 year and 2 years after randomization
Time frame: Day 0, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Year 1, and Year 2 after randomization
A participant is defined as a responder when the mean MAS score of the Primary Target Muscle Groups decreases by at least 1 point compared with baseline. The outcome is reported as the proportion of responders at each assessment.
Time frame: Day 0, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Year 1, and Year 2 after randomization
Active and passive range of motion are measured in degrees for movements corresponding to the assessed muscle groups. Upper-limb measurements include shoulder abduction, shoulder external rotation, elbow extension, elbow flexion, forearm supination, wrist extension, and metacarpophalangeal joint extension. Lower-limb measurements include hip extension, hip abduction, hip external rotation, knee extension, knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion. A greater range generally indicates better joint mobility.
Time frame: Day 0, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Year 1, and Year 2 after randomization
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is used to assess motor and sensory function. The upper-limb motor score ranges from 0 to 66, and the lower-limb motor score ranges from 0 to 34. Light touch sensation is assessed at the upper arm, palm, thigh, and sole, with each site scored from 0 to 2, giving a total score of 0 to 8. Proprioception is assessed at the shoulder, elbow, wrist, thumb, hip, knee, ankle, and toe joints, with each site scored from 0 to 2, giving a total score of 0 to 16. Higher scores indicate better motor and sensory function.
Time frame: Day 0, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Year 1, and Year 2 after randomization
The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is used to assess functional independence. The change in total FIM score from baseline is calculated at each post-baseline assessment. A higher score indicates greater functional independence
Time frame: Day 0, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Year 1, and Year 2 after randomization
The Physician Global Assessment (PGA) is completed by the investigator to assess overall spasticity severity and treatment response. The change in PGA score from baseline is calculated at each post-baseline assessment.
Time frame: Day 0, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Year 1, and Year 2 after randomization
The 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) is used to assess comfortable and fast walking speed. The change in walking time and walking speed from baseline is calculated at each post-baseline assessment. A shorter walking time or higher walking speed indicates better walking performance.
Time frame: Day 0, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Year 1, and Year 2 after randomization
The EQ-5D-5L is used to assess health-related quality of life. The change in the EQ-5D-5L health utility index and EQ-VAS score from baseline is calculated at each post-baseline assessment. Higher scores indicate better health status.
Time frame: Day 0, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24, Year 1, and Year 2 after randomization
Spasticity-related pain is assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10. The change in VAS score from baseline is calculated at each post-baseline assessment. A lower score indicates less pain.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Jianguang Sun
CONTACT
Yifan Yang
CONTACT
Beijing Pins Medical Co., Ltd
Industry
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Poststroke Spasticity: a Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomised, Sham-controlled Trial (SCS-PSS)
Acronym: SCS-PSS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07468149
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Athens, Attica, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT06868342
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiac Conduction System Disease
Liverpool, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT05183100
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07704840
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
View Trial Details