Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03085433

Sperm Selection by Microfluidic Separation Improves Embryo Quality

This is a randomized controlled trial of couples with a history of poor embryo quality undergoing a repeat in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle for unexplained infertility. Couples will be randomized to sperm selection by the clinical standard of centrifugation and density-gradient processing compared to the microfluidic sperm sorting chip.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of California San Francisco

San Francisco, California, 94158, United States

About this study

More than 70 million couples worldwide are infertile and up to 40 million are actively seeking infertility care. In the year 2013, a total of 160,521 assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures were performed in the United States. Isolation of motile and morphologically normal sperm is an integral part of assisted reproduction. Traditional sperm processing for assisted reproduction involves centrifugation and "swim up" techniques that employ a density gradient to isolate motile sperm. This technique involves several steps of centrifugation (200-1800g) with colloidal silica particles. In this process, sperm and other material form distinct bands. It is thought that this procedure allows for elimination of abnormal/immotile sperm as well as debris, thereby isolating motile human sperm. Nevertheless, the centrifugation process has been shown to induce DNA damage and produce reactive oxygen species, thereby potentially compromising sperm quality and subsequent laboratory outcomes such as fertilization rate and embryo quality. Increased sperm DNA damage has been associated with poor outcomes in assisted reproduction, including lower fertilization rates, impaired embryo progression, and decreased pregnancy rates. The details of the density gradient centrifugation process are not regulated by the FDA.

In contrast, microfluidic-based sperm sorting has the capability of selectively isolating highly motile, morphologically normal sperm with high DNA integrity from an unprocessed semen sample. Microfluidic technology isolates healthy sperm by laminar flow, creating gradients through channels. The microfluidic chip we plan to study in our randomized clinical trial utilizes space-constrained microfluidic sorting to select highly motile and morphologically normal sperm in a flow and chemical-free design. Unlike the standard of density gradient centrifugation, no manipulation of sperm is required in this process. Raw semen is introduced into the inflow and only motile and morphologically normal sperm are able to swim through the chip to the outflow where it is collected for use.

In semen samples from healthy male volunteers split into standard processing via centrifugation and swim-up procedure compared with microfluidic sperm sorting, a significantly higher percent motility and lower rate of sperm DNA fragmentation was detected with microfluidic sperm sampling. The microfluidic sperm sorting technique has thus proven to be an efficient and reliable means of sperm preparation compared with the centrifugation and swim-up procedure. While this microfluidic chip has been used clinically in Mexico, Turkey, South Africa, Italy, Greece, and Switzerland resulting in over 5,000 live births, its use in clinical practice has not been rigorously studied. We aim to compare traditional preparation and microfluidic sperm sorting on assisted reproductive technology outcomes including oocyte fertilization and embryo quality in subjects with a history of poor embryo quality electing to undergo a repeat in vitro fertilization cycle for infertility.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The target population includes couples planning in vitro fertilization (IVF) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
  • Subjects with and without a history of prior IVF cycles will be included.
  • All eligible couples where both partners are >=18 years of age will be asked to join the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Male partner with severe oligoasthenospermia (concentration < 5 x 10^6 spermatozoa/mL; motility< 10%)
  • Female partner with anovulation (PCOS, FHA)
  • Female partner age >41
  • Female partner AFC< 7
  • Female partner with obstructed fallopian tubes (assessed in all patients prior to IVF)
  • Use of oocyte donor
  • Either Partner:
  • Cancer diagnosis in either partner
  • Any significant disease or psychiatric disorder that would interfere with consenting process
  • Treatment History:

o History of >1 prior cycle cancellation due to poor response

  • Treatment Plan:
  • Embryo co-culture
  • Use of adjunctive non-gonadotropin medications to improve embryo quality: growth hormone, sildenafil

Treatment and study plan

Microfluidic Sperm Sorting

Device

Microfluidic technology isolates healthy sperm by laminar flow, creating gradients through channels. The microfluidic chip we plan to study in our randomized clinical trial utilizes space-constrained microfluidic sorting to select highly motile and morphologically normal sperm in a flow and chemical-free design. Unlike the standard of density gradient centrifugation, no manipulation of sperm is required in this process. Raw semen is introduced into the inflow and only motile and morphologically normal sperm are able to swim through the chip to the outflow where it is collected for use.

Other names: FERTILE device

In vitro fertilization

Procedure

ivf/icsi

Primary outcomes

  1. Day 3 High Quality Embryo Percentage

    Time frame: 3 days following fertilization

    The primary outcome for intent to treat analysis. Day 3 high quality embryo percentage rate will be defined as the percentage of all viable 2PN embryos on day 3 with at least 6 cells and fragmentation/symmetry scores of 1-2. Scale: 1-6 for either fragmentation or symmetry. Lower scores are better. Calculated as ( the number of high-qualify-grade embryos yielded by a participant / the number of all viable 2PN embryos yielded by the participant x 100)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Egg Fertilization Rate

    Time frame: 1 day following fertilization

    Number of eggs successfully fertilized (2PN embryo count) per number of mature eggs (MII egg count) retrieved per participant. 2PN grade indicates a successfully fertilized embryo. MII grade indicates a metaphase II stage egg which is mature enough to undergo fertilization. (The percentage is calculated for each participant as the number of 2PN embryos obtained / the number of MII eggs obtained x100). The resulting percentages were then averaged to determine the average fertilization rate for participants in each study arm.

  2. Pregnancy Rate

    Time frame: 14 days following embryo transfer

    Pregnancy rate will be defined as achieving a clinical pregnancy ( an ultrasound demonstrating gestational sac with yolk sac) per embryo transfer procedure attempt.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco

Other

Registry information

Acronym: SPERM

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2022
First posted
Mar 21, 2017
Registry last updated
Dec 31, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.