CHU
Limoges, 87000, France
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06723262
Main objective:
Compare speech recognition in noise with tonotopic fitting (FS4T) and with conventional non-tonotopic fitting (FS4noT) in adult patients implanted for 6 months with a MED-EL cochlear implant with FS4noT strategy.
Secondary objectives:
Comparison of FS4noT and FS4T settings
* for speech recognition in quiet * for subjective auditory spatial perception
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Limoges, 87000, France
Location status: Recruiting
Introduction: Cochlear implantation allows the rehabilitation of profound bilateral deafness, restoring speech perception and verbal communication when the traditional hearing aid no longer provides satisfactory hearing gain. A cochlear implant includes an electrode array and its functioning is based on the principle of cochlear tonotopy: each electrode encodes a frequency spectrum according to its position in the cochlea (high frequencies are assigned to the basal electrodes and low frequencies to the apical electrodes). The cochlear implant thus breaks down the frequency spectrum into a number of frequency bands via bandpass filters corresponding to the number of electrodes in the implant. During the fitting these bands can be modified by the audiologist. The fitting software developed by the manufacturers proposed a default fitting with a lower limit between 100 and 250 Hz according to the brands and an upper limit of about 8500 Hz. The frequency bands assigned to each electrode follow a logarithmic scale with the high frequencies for the basal electrodes and the low frequencies for the apical electrodes. This distribution takes into account the number of active electrodes but does not take into account the anatomy and the natural cochlear tonotopy specific to each patient. Several studies have analyzed the anatomical variations of the cochlear dimensions: size of the cochlea and the ratio between the contact surfaces of the electrodes with the cochlea are variable from one patient to another. The insertion depth during surgery is also variable due to parameters related to the patients as well as to the operator, which seems to impact the understanding of speech in noise. Mathematical algorithms have recently been developed to estimate the cochlear tonotopy of each patient from a CT scan assessment. CT imaging of the implanted ear combined with 3D reconstruction software, provides cochlear length measurements. Using this approach it is possible to measure the position of each electrode relative to the cochlear apex. Recently, MED-EL (Austria) has developed a new approach based on CT-scan and tuning of the frequencies associated with each electrode using anatomical information of position of the electrodes in the cochlea: this fitting is called anatomy-based fitting (ABF).
Recently [Jiam et al. 2016, 2019] showed that a frequency fitting based on the tonotopy of the electrodes allowed to obtain a better perception of pitch after 30 minutes of acclimatization. In a prospective randomized crossover study with a wearing time of 6 weeks on new cochlear implantees, Creff et al. (2023, 2024) obtained very significantly superior results with a tonotopic setting compared to a classic setting (HDCIS) for speech recognition tests in noise and for musical perception. However, even if the tonotopic setting appears particularly promising over a period of 6 weeks, it is possible that the difference diminishes over time (Mertens et al.,2021). Brain plasticity could partially or completely compensate for the mismatch after a few months/years of CI use (Svirsky et al. 2004; Reiss et al. 2007, 2014). However, this adaptation may remain incomplete or prolong the acclimatization period even after numerous rehabilitation sessions (Sagi et al. 2010; Svirsky et al. 2015; Tan et al. 2017; Dorman et al. 2022). Further studies on the use of tonotopy-based fitting and its effects on speech understanding, also in experienced CI users, are therefore needed.
Main objective:
Compare speech recognition in noise with tonotopic fitting (FS4T) and with conventional non-tonotopic fitting (FS4noT) in adult patients implanted for 6 months with a MED-EL cochlear implant with FS4noT strategy.
Secondary objectives:
Comparison of FS4noT and FS4T settings
Plan of the study: It is a prospective open monocentric transversal study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Comparison of FS4T and FS4noT
Other names: No tonotopic cochlear implant fitting FS4noT
Time frame: 6 weeks after FS4T fitting
Framatrix test. Speech and noise in front the participant (at 1m). Noise level: 65 dB SPL. Speech level: adaptive with the answers of the participant. Result: speech-to-noise ratio (speech reception threshold, SRT50) for 50% of intelligibility in noise.
Test with FS4T and with FS4noT
Time frame: 6 weeks after FS4T fitting
Two lists of 10 disyllabic words (Fournier lists) at 65 dB SPL. The participant has to repeat the word emitted. Result: score on 20.
Test with FS4T and with FS4noT.
Time frame: At FS4T fitting and 6 weeks after FS4T fitting
Questionnaire SSQi15 (" Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of hearing scale ", SSQ). The questionnaire consists of 15 questions describing various real-world hearing situations.
The subject answers each question with a score on a visual analogue scale graduated from 0 (worse) to 10 (better) ranging from "not at all" (0) to "yes perfectly" (10).
The result obtained is composed of
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbH
Industry
Contribution to Speech Perception of a Tonotopy-based Fitting for Patients With Cochlear Implants for 6 Months With a Conventional Setting: Prospective Cross-sectional Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05402813
AUNB1, Congenital Deafness
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06354010
Deafness, Ear Diseases
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06737185
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Dijon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05572073
Auditory neuropathy, Ear Diseases
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
View Trial Details