CHU
Dijon, 21000, France
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06737185
Main objective:
Compare speech recognition in noise with tonotopic setting (FS4T) and with tonotopic fitting modified by evolutionary algorithm (EAFS4T) in adult patients implanted for 6 months or more with a MED-EL cochlear implant with FS4T.
Secondary objectives:
Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T settings
* for speech recognition in quiet * for subjective auditory spatial perception * for subjective auditory and musical perception
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dijon, 21000, France
Location status: Recruiting
Introduction: Cochlear implantation allows the rehabilitation of profound bilateral deafness, restoring speech perception and verbal communication when the traditional hearing aid no longer provides satisfactory hearing gain. A cochlear implant includes an electrode array and its functioning is based on the principle of cochlear tonotopy: each electrode encodes a frequency spectrum according to its position in the cochlea (high frequencies are assigned to the basal electrodes and low frequencies to the apical electrodes). The cochlear implant thus breaks down the frequency spectrum into a number of frequency bands via bandpass filters corresponding to the number of electrodes in the implant. During the fitting these bands can be modified by the audiologist. The fitting software developed by the manufacturers proposed a default fitting with a lower limit between 100 and 250 Hz according to the brands and an upper limit of about 8500 Hz. The frequency bands assigned to each electrode follow a logarithmic scale with the high frequencies for the basal electrodes and the low frequencies for the apical electrodes. This distribution takes into account the number of active electrodes but does not take into account the anatomy and the natural cochlear tonotopy specific to each patient. Several studies have analyzed the anatomical variations of the cochlear dimensions: size of the cochlea and the ratio between the contact surfaces of the electrodes with the cochlea are variable from one patient to another. The insertion depth during surgery is also variable due to parameters related to the patients as well as to the operator, which seems to impact the understanding of speech in noise. Mathematical algorithms have recently been developed to estimate the cochlear tonotopy of each patient from a CT scan assessment. CT imaging of the implanted ear combined with 3D reconstruction software, provides cochlear length measurements Using this approach it is possible to measure the position of each electrode relative to the cochlear apex. Recently, MED-EL (Austria) has developed a new approach based on CT-scan and tuning of the frequencies associated with each electrode using anatomical information of position of the electrodes in the cochlea: this fitting is called anatomy-based fitting.
A tonotopy-based fitting allows for better results in pitch perception or speech perception in noise or musical perception. However, there is a large variability in the results observed between patients. This variability could be due to the individual characteristics of the listeners (neuronal survival, current propagation and spread, duration of deafness, lack of cortical plasticity).
A modification of frequency allocations in the setting could take into account this individual variability and improve speech discrimination and music perception. Saadoun et al. (2022) studied on 27 subjects the effect of an adjustment of frequency allocation by an evolutionary algorithm (EA) approach and showed an improvement in speech perception in noise compared to a default setting (not based on tonotopy) for patients implanted for more than 6 months in a bimodal situation (with a contralateral prosthesis). We therefore propose to use evolutionary algorithms to modify the tonotopy-based fitting and improve the perception in noise of implanted patients.
Main objective:
Compare speech recognition in noise with tonotopic setting (FS4T) and tonotopic fitting modified by evolutionary algorithm (EAFS4T) in adult patients implanted for 6 months or more with a MED-EL cochlear implant with FS4T.
Secondary objectives:
Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T settings
Plan of the study: It is a prospective open monocentric transversal study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T
Other names: FS4T: tonotopic-based fitting
Time frame: 6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting
HINT-5 min test. Noise level: 60 dB SPL. Speech level: adaptive with the answers of the participant. Result: speech-to-noise ratio (speech reception threshold, SRT50) for 50% of intelligibility in noise.
Test with EAFS4T and with FS4T.
Time frame: 6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting
One list of 10 disyllabic words (Fournier lists) at 65 dB SPL. The participant has to repeat the word emitted.
Result: score on 10. Test with EAFS4T and with FS4T
Time frame: at EAFS4T fitting (6 months after cochlear implant activation) and 6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting
SSQi15 questionnaire (" Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of hearing scale ", SSQ). The questionnaire consists of 15 questions describing various real-world hearing situations.
The subject answers each question with a score on a visual analogue scale graduated from 0 to 10 ranging from "not at all" to "yes perfectly".
The result obtained is composed of
Questionnaire with FS4T (at EAFS4T fitting) and with EAFS4T (6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting)
Time frame: at EAFS4T fitting (6 months after cochlear implant activation) and 6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting
Assessment of sound quality in silence and in noise with 4 statements. Likert scale from 1 to 5. Score on 20.
Likert scale with FS4T (at EAFS4T fitting) and with EAFS4T (6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting)
Time frame: at EAFS4T fitting (6 months after cochlear implant activation) and 6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting
Six questions from the Munich Music Self-Questionnaire [Stark et al. 2003]. Questionnaire with FS4T (at EAFS4T fitting) and with EAFS4T (6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbH
Industry
Comparison of Speech Understanding Between Tonotopy-based Fitting and Evolutionary Algorithm-based Setting: a Prospective Cross-sectional Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05402813
AUNB1, Congenital Deafness
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06354010
Deafness, Ear Diseases
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06723262
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Limoges, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05572073
Auditory neuropathy, Ear Diseases
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
View Trial Details